Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Kuga vs Volvo XC90 - Differences and prices compared
Kuga
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Kuga has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34200 £, while the Volvo XC90 costs 69800 £. That’s a price difference of around 35520 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Kuga manages with 2.80 L and is therefore clearly perceptible more efficient than the Volvo XC90 with 3.50 L. The difference is about 0.70 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Volvo XC90 performs barely noticeable better – achieving up to 71 km, about 3 km more than the Ford Kuga.
XC90
@ Volvo Cars
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC90 has a significantly edge – offering 455 HP compared to 243 HP. That’s roughly 212 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC90 is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Ford Kuga takes 7.30 s. That’s about 1.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Kuga performs minimal better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Volvo XC90 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC90 pulls significantly stronger with 709 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 469 Nm difference.
Kuga
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Volvo XC90 offers distinct more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Ford Kuga is evident lighter – 1526 kg compared to 2080 kg. The difference is around 554 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Kuga offers clearly perceptible more room – 412 L compared to 302 L. That’s a difference of about 110 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC90 performs a bit better – up to 1856 L, which is about 322 L more than the Ford Kuga.
When it comes to payload, Volvo XC90 noticeable takes the win – 710 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 160 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Volvo XC90 shows itself to be wins by a narrow margin and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £69,800
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC90
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC90
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Kuga
3.9 (3 Reviews)
The Kuga is Ford’s adaptable family SUV that blends usable space with a surprisingly lively driving character, making daily commutes and weekend escapes equally enjoyable. With smart interior packaging, an easy-to-use infotainment setup and composed road manners, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want a bit of fun without the fuss.
details
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Volvo XC90
5 (1 Reviews)
The Volvo XC90 is a serene Scandinavian SUV that mixes minimalist luxury with a composed, confidence-inspiring presence — ideal for buyers who want family practicality without sacrificing style. Inside it serves up a calm, well-crafted cabin and user-friendly tech that keeps long journeys pleasant and tantrums to a minimum, making the XC90 a smart, stylish pick for sensible drivers.
details
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC90
|
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
@ Volvo Cars
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34200 - 46300 £
|
Price
69800 - 84600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
3.5 - 8.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
68 km
|
Electric Range
71 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
1.1 - 14.4 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
|
|
co2
55 - 154 g/km
|
co2
79 - 191 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 - 54 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1526 - 1859 kg
|
Curb weight
2080 - 2297 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
412 L
|
Trunk capacity
262 - 302 L
|
|
Length
4604 - 4645 mm
|
Length
4953 mm
|
|
Width
1882 mm
|
Width
1923 mm
|
|
Height
1673 - 1681 mm
|
Height
1771 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1534 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1816 - 1856 L
|
|
Payload
541 - 550 kg
|
Payload
653 - 710 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
|
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
195 - 200 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
240 Nm
|
Torque
360 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
|
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1496 - 2488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Volvo
|
What drivetrain options does the Ford Kuga have?
The Ford Kuga is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.