VS

Ford Kuga vs Volvo XC90 comparison

Compare performance (243 HP vs 406 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 74,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Volvo XC90?

Ford Kuga vs Volvo XC90: Key differences

Ford Kuga

4.2 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • visibly more efficient
  • clearly lighter
details

Volvo XC90

5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • barely more electric range
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kuga

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Ford Kuga is clearly cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Volvo XC90 costs 74,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 40,063 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Kuga uses 2.8 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Volvo XC90 with 3.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.6 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo XC90 offers barely more range – reaching up to 69 km, about 1 km more than the Ford Kuga.

XC90

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC90 offers substantially more power – delivering 406 HP compared to 243 HP. That’s roughly 163 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC90 is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Ford Kuga takes 7.3 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC90 delivers significantly more torque with 669 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 429 Nm more.

Kuga

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Volvo XC90 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Kuga is clearly lighter – 1,526 kg compared to 2,080 kg. The difference is around 554 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC90 carries clearly more – 710 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 160 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo XC90 sits just ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £74,300
XC90

Volvo XC90

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 250 - 406 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.4 - 8.3 L/100km
  • Electric Range 69 km
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC90

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Kuga

The Ford Kuga is a practical and comfortable compact SUV that balances everyday usability with a composed ride and adaptable interior. It offers sensible tech and safety features, making it a solid choice for families or anyone seeking a versatile, easy-to-live-with crossover.

details

Volvo XC90

The Volvo XC90 is a serene Scandinavian SUV that mixes minimalist luxury with a composed, confidence-inspiring presence — ideal for buyers who want family practicality without sacrificing style. Inside it serves up a calm, well-crafted cabin and user-friendly tech that keeps long journeys pleasant and tantrums to a minimum, making the XC90 a smart, stylish pick for sensible drivers.

details
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC90

Costs and Consumption

Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
Price
74,300 - 84,600 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3.4 - 8.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
68 km
Electric Range
69 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
55 - 154 g/km
co2
71 - 188 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
Curb weight
2,080 - 2,350 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,882 mm
Width
1,923 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
541 - 550 kg
Payload
600 - 710 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
Power HP
250 - 406 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
240 Nm
Torque
360 - 669 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
Power kW
184 - 299 kW
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
Brand
Ford
Brand
Volvo
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.