Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Mustang Coupe vs Mazda CX-60 comparison
Compare performance (453 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (51,800 £ vs 43,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Coupe or Mazda CX-60?
Ford Mustang Coupe vs Mazda CX-60: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Mustang Coupe
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mazda CX-60 is moderately cheaper – starting at 43,700 £ , while the Ford Mustang Coupe costs 51,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,100 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-60 uses 3.8 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Ford Mustang Coupe with 12 L/100km. The difference is about 8.2 L/100km.
CX-60
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Coupe offers clearly more power – delivering 453 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 126 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Coupe is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.4 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.8 s. That’s about 1.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers barely more torque with 550 Nm compared to 540 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Mazda CX-60 offers more seats – 5 vs 4.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Mustang Coupe is barely lighter – 1,808 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 82 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries significantly more – 612 kg compared to 334 kg. That’s a difference of about 278 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mazda CX-60 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £43,700
Mazda CX-60
Ford Mustang Coupe
Mazda CX-60
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Mustang Coupe
The Ford Mustang Coupe wears its muscle on its sleeve, delivering a raw, grin-inducing driving experience that turns everyday roads into a little theater of noise and swagger. Inside it's surprisingly livable for regular use, so if you want headline-grabbing looks and a proper driver's car without pretending to be a luxury cruiser, the Mustang coupe is a very entertaining choice.
details
Mazda CX-60
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
Ford Mustang Coupe
Mazda CX-60
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
51,800 - 65,600 £
|
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
12 - 12.4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
275 - 282 g/km
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Coupe
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
4
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,808 - 1,837 kg
|
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,916 - 1,917 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
327 - 334 kg
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
446 - 453 HP
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 5.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
540 Nm
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
8
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
328 - 334 kW
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
5,038 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mazda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.