VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs KGM Musso EV comparison

Compare performance (487 HP vs 414 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or KGM Musso EV?

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs KGM Musso EV: Key differences

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.8 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat more power
  • visibly more efficient
  • clearly more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter
details

KGM Musso EV

  • markedly cheaper
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

KGM Musso EV is markedly cheaper – starting at 36,000 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,437 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is visibly more efficient: consuming 17.7 kWh/100km compared to 23 kWh/100km for the KGM Musso EV. That’s a difference of about 5.3 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers clearly more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 180 km more than the KGM Musso EV.

Musso EV

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers somewhat more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 414 HP. That’s roughly 73 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the KGM Musso EV takes 8 s. That’s about 4.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers noticeably more torque with 950 Nm compared to 678 Nm. That’s about 272 Nm more.

Mustang Mach-E

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Mustang Mach-E is only slightly lighter – 2,161 kg compared to 2,165 kg. The difference is around 4 kg.

When it comes to payload, the KGM Musso EV carries significantly more – 905 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 455 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Mustang Mach-E

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 470 - 600 km
Ford Mustang Mach-E
KGM Musso EV

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Mustang Mach-E

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details

KGM Musso EV

The Musso EV blends pickup practicality with an electric drivetrain, delivering quiet performance and a roomy, well-equipped cabin that suits both work and everyday use. Its robust design and straightforward controls make it a compelling choice for buyers who want a capable utility vehicle with cleaner operation.

details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
KGM Musso EV

Costs and Consumption

Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
Price
36,000 - 45,400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
23 - 26 kWh/100km
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Electric Range
379 - 420 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Pickup
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
Curb weight
2,165 - 2,285 kg
Trunk capacity
519 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,881 mm
Width
1,920 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
368 - 450 kg
Payload
805 - 905 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Power HP
207 - 414 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Torque
339 - 678 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Power kW
152 - 304 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
KGM
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.