VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Mitsubishi ASX comparison

Compare performance (487 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Mitsubishi ASX?

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Mitsubishi ASX: Key differences

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.4 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely more trunk space
details

Mitsubishi ASX

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • significantly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mitsubishi ASX is substantially cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 27,008 £.

ASX

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers considerably more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 329 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Mitsubishi ASX takes 8.9 s. That’s about 5.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers considerably more torque with 950 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 705 Nm more.

Mustang Mach-E

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi ASX is significantly lighter – 1,296 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 865 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers barely more boot space – 519 L compared to 484 L. That’s a difference of about 35 L.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Mustang Mach-E carries barely more – 450 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 5 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Mustang Mach-E

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 470 - 600 km
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Mitsubishi ASX

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Mustang Mach-E

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details

Mitsubishi ASX

The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.

details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Mitsubishi ASX

Costs and Consumption

Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
Price
21,400 - 32,500 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
99 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
Curb weight
1,296 - 1,493 kg
Trunk capacity
519 L
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,881 mm
Width
1,797 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
368 - 450 kg
Payload
397 - 445 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Torque
190 - 245 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mitsubishi
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.