Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs NIO ET5 comparison
Compare performance (487 HP vs 490 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 40,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or NIO ET5?
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs NIO ET5: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Mustang Mach-E
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
NIO ET5 is a bit cheaper – starting at 40,700 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,714 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is marginally more efficient: consuming 17.7 kWh/100km compared to 18.6 kWh/100km for the NIO ET5. That’s a difference of about 0.9 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 10 km more than the NIO ET5.
ET5
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the NIO ET5 offers marginally more power – delivering 490 HP compared to 487 HP. That’s roughly 3 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the NIO ET5 takes 4 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers markedly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 700 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm more.
Mustang Mach-E
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Mustang Mach-E is very slightly lighter – 2,161 kg compared to 2,215 kg. The difference is around 54 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers markedly more boot space – 519 L compared to 386 L. That’s a difference of about 133 L.
When it comes to payload, the NIO ET5 carries only slightly more – 475 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 25 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is clearly ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £48,400
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Ford Mustang Mach-E
NIO ET5
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Mustang Mach-E
The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.
details
NIO ET5
NIO ET5 arrives with sleek, minimalist lines and a cabin that feels more like a calm lounge than a dashboard, delivering a composed drive that keeps motorway monotony at bay. Tech is smart rather than showy, and the brand’s novel ownership options make it an appealing choice for buyers who want electric convenience without the usual headaches — plus it brings enough personality to make charging stops less boring.
details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
NIO ET5
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
|
Price
40,700 - 58,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.6 - 18.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
|
Electric Range
456 - 590 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
73.5 - 90 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
|
Curb weight
2,215 - 2,235 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
519 L
|
Trunk capacity
386 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,790 mm
|
|
Width
1,881 mm
|
Width
1,960 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,499 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,135 L
|
|
Payload
368 - 450 kg
|
Payload
455 - 475 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
|
Power HP
490 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
200 km/h
|
|
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
|
Torque
700 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
|
Power kW
360 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2023
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
NIO
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.