VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Nissan Interstar comparison

Compare performance (487 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Nissan Interstar?

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Nissan Interstar: Key differences

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.4 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • clearly more electric range
details

Nissan Interstar

  • visibly cheaper
  • only slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Nissan Interstar is visibly cheaper – starting at 36,000 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,473 £.

As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers clearly more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 190 km more than the Nissan Interstar.

Interstar

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers significantly more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 317 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers clearly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 380 Nm. That’s about 570 Nm more.

Mustang Mach-E

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Nissan Interstar offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Interstar is only slightly lighter – 2,053 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 108 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan Interstar carries significantly more – 1,447 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 997 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Mustang Mach-E

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 470 - 600 km
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Nissan Interstar

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Mustang Mach-E

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details

Nissan Interstar

The Nissan Interstar is a sensible, no-nonsense panel van that puts practicality front and center, with a cavernous load area and a durable feel built for daily work. It drives with surprising composure for its size, keeps running costs modest, and feels like the kind of professional tool that prefers reliable service over flashy showboating.

details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Nissan Interstar

Costs and Consumption

Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
Price
36,000 - 54,600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
7.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Electric Range
410 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 - 195 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
3 - 7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
Curb weight
2,053 - 2,455 kg
Trunk capacity
519 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,881 mm
Width
2,080 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
368 - 450 kg
Payload
1,045 - 1,447 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Power HP
130 - 170 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Power kW
96 - 125 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Nissan
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.