Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer comparison
Compare performance (487 HP vs 196 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer?
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Mustang Mach-E
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer is clearly cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,437 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer is slightly more efficient: consuming 15.6 kWh/100km compared to 17.7 kWh/100km for the Ford Mustang Mach-E. That’s a difference of about 2.1 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers clearly more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 155 km more than the Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer.
Astra Sports Tourer
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers clearly more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 196 HP. That’s roughly 291 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer takes 7.7 s. That’s about 3.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers considerably more torque with 950 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 590 Nm more.
Mustang Mach-E
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer is clearly lighter – 1,438 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 723 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer offers somewhat more boot space – 597 L compared to 519 L. That’s a difference of about 78 L.
When it comes to payload, the Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer carries a bit more – 502 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 52 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £48,400
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Mustang Mach-E
The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.
details
Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer
The Opel Astra Sports Tourer blends family-friendly practicality with a sleek, grown-up wagon silhouette that manages to be both useful and unexpectedly stylish. It’s an easy car to live with — comfortable, well put together and clever with space — a sensible choice for buyers who want everyday versatility without fuss.
details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
|
Price
30,000 - 39,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
|
Electric Range
83 - 445 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 132 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
|
Curb weight
1,438 - 1,765 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
519 L
|
Trunk capacity
466 - 597 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,881 mm
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
368 - 450 kg
|
Payload
434 - 502 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
|
Power HP
130 - 196 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.7 - 10.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 360 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
|
Power kW
96 - 144 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B, D, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Vauxhall
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.