VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Renault Clio comparison

Compare performance (487 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Renault Clio?

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Renault Clio: Key differences

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.8 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly more trunk space
details

Renault Clio

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • considerably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Renault Clio is clearly cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 31,371 £.

Clio

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers considerably more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 329 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Renault Clio takes 8.3 s. That’s about 4.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers significantly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 190 Nm. That’s about 760 Nm more.

Mustang Mach-E

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Clio is considerably lighter – 1,202 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 959 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers visibly more boot space – 519 L compared to 327 L. That’s a difference of about 192 L.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Clio carries only slightly more – 463 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 13 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Mustang Mach-E

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 470 - 600 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Capri
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Capri and the Ford Mustang Mach-E represent two very different takes on driving pleasure—one a classic sporty coupe with nostalgic charm, the other a modern all-electric crossover with high-tech performance. This comparison will help you weigh classic style and driving feel against …
Kia Picanto
Renault Clio
VS
The Kia Picanto and Renault Clio are popular choices in the small-car market, but they suit different needs: the Picanto excels as an ultra-compact, easy-to-park city car with strong value, while the Clio offers more space, refinement and equipment for everyday family use. If you prioritise low …
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Mustang Mach-E

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_23-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_19-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_24-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_05-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_09-LOW

Reviews Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.8 (4 Reviews)
rate
Roel
10 Jun 2026, 04:25:36

Incredibly beautiful SUV. The most beautiful one out there in terms of style.
The interior could be a bit more modern... but the seats feel amazing.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Yvo Trimbos
15 Mar 2026, 19:07:15

Lovely car with sporty handling and fantastic seats.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
M
7 Dec 2025, 19:35:44

Rubbish car.

Features clearly not as polished as other EV SUVs at similar prices (e.g. Volvo EX40 / BYD Sealion 7))

Alarms about driver fatigues every 10 minutes.

Monika
6 Nov 2025, 16:28:23

Well-built car, reasonably priced — unlike the inflated costs of German cars.

Renault Clio

The Renault Clio is a smartly styled and practical compact hatch that feels at home in city traffic while offering a surprisingly refined ride. It pairs user-friendly tech and a comfortable interior with a reputation for being economical and easy to live with.

details
r212202p
r212188p
r212211p

Reviews Renault Clio

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
technoman
31 Mar 2026, 08:36:27

Having owned a clio now for the last 8 years we have found the 0.9ltr engine to work well both around town and on motorways . Averaging around 45mpg on mixed driving. The 3 cylinder engine has no cambelt to worry about . Interior has worked and worn well . No defects at all during owner ship BUT the striking red paintwork (metallic) is showing deterioration and is expensive to put right and this would be the only reason for dropping a star off the rating . There are two main services on the car an A and a B service. All they do on the A service is change the cabin filter and do the usual safety checks which costa around £120 the second B service is oil and filter change around £230 but at 36000 miles need air filter and brake fluid change which can add another £120

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Juke
Renault Clio
VS
Choosing between the Juke and the Clio comes down to whether you want a compact crossover with bold styling and a higher driving position or a polished, practical hatchback focused on everyday usability. If you prioritise standout looks and a more commanding ride go for the Juke; if you want …
Citroen C3
Renault Clio
VS
City supermini buyers face a tasty dilemma: the Citroën C3 charms with cosy ride comfort, playful looks and practical flair, while the Renault Clio answers with sharper handling, a more premium cabin and smarter tech. Choose the C3 if you prioritise comfort and personality; pick the Clio if you …
Renault Clio
VW Polo
VS
The Renault Clio and VW Polo are two of Europe's best-selling superminis, each offering smart styling, efficient engines and practical interiors. This comparison focuses on real-world driving, interior space, running costs and tech to help you pick which small car suits you best.
MG MG3
Renault Clio
VS
The MG3 and Clio are both small hatchbacks aimed at buyers wanting an affordable, city-friendly car, but they take different approaches to style, equipment and driving character. This comparison looks at where the MG3’s value-focused simplicity stacks up against the Clio’s sharper handling, nicer …
Renault Captur
Renault Clio
VS
The Renault Captur and Renault Clio share Renault’s DNA but pursue different lifestyles: the Captur lifts you above traffic with compact-SUV presence, while the Clio stays low, nimble and city-savvy. In this quick duel we’ll compare space, economy and driving feel to help you choose between …
Opel Corsa
Renault Clio
VS
The Vauxhall Corsa and the Renault Clio are two of the UK’s most popular superminis, each offering a different blend of driving feel, practicality and everyday refinement. This comparison will focus on their driving dynamics, interior quality, running costs and practicality to help you decide which …
Renault Clio
Renault R5
VS
The Clio is the sensible, all-weather hatch — efficient, tech-rich and practical for families and commuters who want a solid everyday car. The R5 is a cheeky retro reboot with electric city credentials and heaps of character — pick the Clio for logic and space, the R5 for style and smile-inducing …
Ford Puma
Renault Clio
VS
The Ford Puma and Renault Clio are two popular compact choices that blend city-friendly dimensions with striking style, yet they adopt different priorities in driving character and practicality. The Puma leans toward a higher-riding, crossover feel with clever boot and storage solutions, while the …
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
92 - 118 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
Trunk capacity
519 L
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,881 mm
Width
1,768 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
368 - 450 kg
Payload
453 - 463 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Torque
190 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
Brand
Ford
Brand
Renault
What drivetrain options does the Ford Mustang Mach-E have?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.