Compare performance (487 HP vs 82 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Suzuki Swift?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Suzuki Swift is substantially cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 31,286 £.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers substantially more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 82 HP. That’s roughly 405 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers considerably more torque with 950 Nm compared to 112 Nm. That’s about 838 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Swift is substantially lighter – 1,069 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 1,092 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Mustang Mach-E carries clearly more – 450 kg compared to 296 kg. That’s a difference of about 154 kg.
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.
detailsThe Suzuki Swift is a cheeky little hatch that turns city streets into its playground with lively handling and a grin-inducing drive. Practical enough for daily chores, thrifty to run and kinder on your wallet than many rivals, it's a sensible pick for buyers who want fun without drama.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
|
Price
17,100 - 21,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 4.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
98 - 110 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
|
Curb weight
1,069 - 1,145 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
519 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,881 mm
|
Width
1,735 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
368 - 450 kg
|
Payload
282 - 296 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
|
Power HP
82 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
|
Torque
112 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
|
Power kW
61 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,197 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Suzuki
|