Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Tesla Model 3 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (487 HP vs 460 HP), boot space and price (48400 £ vs 34300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Tesla Model 3?
Mustang Mach-E
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Tesla Model 3 has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34300 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14151 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Tesla Model 3: with 13.20 kWh per 100 km, it’s distinct more efficient than the Ford Mustang Mach-E with 17.70 kWh. That’s a difference of about 4.50 kWh.
As for electric range, the Tesla Model 3 performs a bit better – achieving up to 750 km, about 150 km more than the Ford Mustang Mach-E.
Model 3
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E has a hardly perceptible edge – offering 487 HP compared to 460 HP. That’s roughly 27 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Tesla Model 3 is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 3.10 s, while the Ford Mustang Mach-E takes 3.80 s. That’s about 0.70 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Mustang Mach-E pulls distinct stronger with 950 Nm compared to 660 Nm. That’s about 290 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Mustang Mach-E
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Tesla Model 3 is slightly lighter – 1822 kg compared to 2161 kg. The difference is around 339 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Tesla Model 3 offers a bit more room – 594 L compared to 519 L. That’s a difference of about 75 L.
When it comes to payload, Ford Mustang Mach-E clearly perceptible takes the win – 450 kg compared to 333 kg. That’s a difference of about 117 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Tesla Model 3 shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £34,300
Tesla Model 3
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Tesla Model 3
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Mustang Mach-E
3 (2 Reviews)
The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.
details
Tesla Model 3
2.9 (2 Reviews)
The Tesla Model 3 slices through daily commuting with a silent, confident shove that makes petrolheads reassess their life choices, while its minimalist cabin feels more like a slick gadget gallery than a traditional car interior. For buyers after a fuss-free, tech-forward electric with plenty of grin factor and low running drama, it’s hard to beat—just don't be surprised when the car updates itself overnight.
details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Tesla Model 3
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
48400 - 66900 £
|
Price
34300 - 50100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.2 - 16.7 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
|
Electric Range
550 - 750 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
64.5 - 83 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
2161 - 2351 kg
|
Curb weight
1822 - 1929 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
519 L
|
Trunk capacity
594 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4720 - 4724 mm
|
|
Width
1881 mm
|
Width
1850 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1431 - 1440 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
368 - 450 kg
|
Payload
303 - 333 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
|
Power HP
283 - 460 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.1 - 6.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
201 - 262 km/h
|
|
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 660 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
|
Power kW
208 - 338 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Tesla
|
What drive types are available for the Ford Mustang Mach-E?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.