VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Toyota C-HR comparison

Compare performance (487 HP vs 223 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Toyota C-HR?

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Toyota C-HR: Key differences

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.4 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • considerably more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately more trunk space
details

Toyota C-HR

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • substantially lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Toyota C-HR is clearly cheaper – starting at 29,100 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 19,294 £.

As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers considerably more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 534 km more than the Toyota C-HR.

C-HR

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers significantly more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 223 HP. That’s roughly 264 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Toyota C-HR takes 7.4 s. That’s about 3.6 s quicker.

Mustang Mach-E

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Toyota C-HR is substantially lighter – 1,505 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 656 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers moderately more boot space – 519 L compared to 447 L. That’s a difference of about 72 L.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Mustang Mach-E carries marginally more – 450 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 25 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Mustang Mach-E

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 470 - 600 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Capri
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Capri is pure 1970s charisma — a lightweight, analogue coupe that thrills with raw charm and classic looks but asks you to forgive creature comforts, modern safety tech and everyday reliability. By contrast the Ford Mustang Mach‑E slaps Mustang attitude onto an electric, family-friendly …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its …
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Toyota C-HR

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Mustang Mach-E

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_23-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_19-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_24-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_05-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_09-LOW

Reviews Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.4 (3 Reviews)
rate
Yvo Trimbos
15 Mar 2026, 19:07:15

Lovely car with sporty handling and fantastic seats.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
M
7 Dec 2025, 19:35:44

Rubbish car.

Features clearly not as polished as other EV SUVs at similar prices (e.g. Volvo EX40 / BYD Sealion 7))

Alarms about driver fatigues every 10 minutes.

Monika
6 Nov 2025, 16:28:23

Well-built car, reasonably priced — unlike the inflated costs of German cars.

Toyota C-HR

The Toyota C-HR wraps efficient hybrid drivetrains in dramatic, European‑tuned styling and a noticeably upmarket cabin, delivering composed ride quality and easy city manners that suit style‑minded commuters and company drivers. Accept a tighter, dim rear seat, a fiddly high‑lip boot and occasional CVT grumble plus persistent warning chimes, and you get a very economical, confident little crossover that prizes individuality over outright practicality.

details
64380-c-hr-grey-2020-25-web-lr
64412-c-hr-grey-2020-41-web-lr
64421-c-hr-grey-2020-32-web-lr
64409-c-hr-grey-2020-37-web-lr
64403-c-hr-grey-2020-52-web-lr

Reviews Toyota C-HR

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
Sam baba
25 Apr 2026, 21:54:02

Reliability and no maintenance costs, plus a futuristic design.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Toyota C-HR
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Toyota C-HR and the posher C-HR+ share the same eye-catching coupe‑SUV shape, but one is aimed at shoppers after clever practicality while the other courts buyers wanting a bit more kit and a touch of swagger. We line them up to see whether the C-HR+’s extra toys justify the price bump — or if …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Prius
VS
In this DriveDuel showdown we pit the sharp, coupe‑like Toyota C‑HR against the evergreen Toyota Prius to see whether style and urban swagger can outshine outright thriftiness. Choose the C‑HR for crossover looks, punchy handling and personality; pick the Prius for class‑leading fuel economy, …
Ford Explorer EV
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Explorer EV swaps the Mustang Mach‑E’s athletic poise for SUV practicality, three-row space and a taller stance — ideal if you need family duties, towing and sensible range without sacrificing slick tech. But if you crave sharper handling, a sportier silhouette and a more emotional drive, …
Lexus UX
Toyota C-HR
VS
In the compact crossover showdown, the Lexus UX and Toyota C-HR go head-to-head: one offers quiet, premium refinement while the other dazzles with bold styling and better value. We put them through real-world checks — styling, comfort, tech and running costs — so you can decide whether to pick …
Toyota C-HR
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV market, the Toyota C-HR stands out with its striking design and hybrid efficiency, appealing to eco-conscious drivers. In contrast, the VW T-Roc offers a more traditional, yet stylish approach with a focus on practicality and customizable features, catering to …
Lexus LBX
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Lexus LBX feels like the posh roommate you suddenly inherited — plush cabin, hushed hybrid powertrain and a dashboard that whispers premium — while the Toyota C‑HR plays the affordable style rebel with quirky looks and surprisingly practical packaging. Choose the LBX for serene luxury and badge …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Corolla
VS
The Toyota C‑HR is the flamboyant, coupe‑like crossover that trades rear-seat space for eye-catching design and a higher stance, while the Toyota Corolla is the dependable compact that serves up better packaging, comfort and efficient powertrains. If you want personality and city swagger, pick the …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris
VS
Meet the Toyota C‑HR and the Toyota Yaris: one dresses like a crossover pop star with dramatic styling and a taller stance, while the other is the compact, sensible hatchback built for city life. Choose the C‑HR for presence, space and a firmer ride; pick the Yaris for nimble handling, lower …
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Toyota C-HR

Costs and Consumption
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
Price
29,100 - 42,800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Electric Range
66 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
52 - 116 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
Curb weight
1,505 - 1,755 kg
Trunk capacity
519 L
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,881 mm
Width
1,832 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
368 - 450 kg
Payload
375 - 425 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,798 - 1,987 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
Brand
Ford
Brand
Toyota
What drivetrain options does the Ford Mustang Mach-E have?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.