Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Toyota Proace Transporter comparison
Compare performance (487 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 31,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Toyota Proace Transporter?
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Toyota Proace Transporter: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Mustang Mach-E
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Toyota Proace Transporter is considerably cheaper – starting at 31,600 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,793 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is visibly more efficient: consuming 17.7 kWh/100km compared to 23.8 kWh/100km for the Toyota Proace Transporter. That’s a difference of about 6.1 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers substantially more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 251 km more than the Toyota Proace Transporter.
Proace Transporter
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers considerably more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 337 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Toyota Proace Transporter takes 12.1 s. That’s about 8.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers considerably more torque with 950 Nm compared to 370 Nm. That’s about 580 Nm more.
Mustang Mach-E
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Toyota Proace Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Toyota Proace Transporter is visibly lighter – 1,656 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 505 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Toyota Proace Transporter carries clearly more – 1,323 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 873 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £48,400
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Toyota Proace Transporter
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Mustang Mach-E
The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.
details
Toyota Proace Transporter
The Toyota Proace Transporter is a no-nonsense work van that pairs Toyota’s dependable reputation with smart practicality, so you can load, drive and finish the job without unnecessary drama. It won’t win design awards, but with a comfortable cab, sensible feature set and a focus on getting things done, it quietly keeps fleets and small businesses smiling.
details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Toyota Proace Transporter
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
|
Price
31,600 - 51,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
6.4 - 6.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
23.8 - 23.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
|
Electric Range
349 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
|
Curb weight
1,656 - 2,100 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
519 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,881 mm
|
Width
1,920 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
368 - 450 kg
|
Payload
955 - 1,323 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
|
Power HP
120 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.1 - 13.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 370 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
|
Power kW
88 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,499 - 2,184 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, A, G
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Toyota
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.