VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Volvo ES90 comparison

Compare performance (487 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 69,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Volvo ES90?

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Volvo ES90: Key differences

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.8 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly lighter
details

Volvo ES90

4.3 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly more power
  • only slightly more efficient
  • moderately more electric range
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Ford Mustang Mach-E is clearly cheaper – starting at 48,400 £ , while the Volvo ES90 costs 69,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21,506 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Volvo ES90 is only slightly more efficient: consuming 16.6 kWh/100km compared to 17.7 kWh/100km for the Ford Mustang Mach-E. That’s a difference of about 1.1 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo ES90 offers moderately more range – reaching up to 706 km, about 106 km more than the Ford Mustang Mach-E.

ES90

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo ES90 offers visibly more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 487 HP. That’s roughly 193 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Volvo ES90 takes 4 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers marginally more torque with 950 Nm compared to 870 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm more.

Mustang Mach-E

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Mustang Mach-E is clearly lighter – 2,161 kg compared to 2,610 kg. The difference is around 449 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo ES90 carries barely more – 460 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 10 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo ES90 has only a minor advantage in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £69,900
ES90

Volvo ES90

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 456 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 706 km
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Volvo ES90

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Mustang Mach-E

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details

Volvo ES90

The Volvo ES90 stands out as a luxury sedan, embodying Scandinavian elegance combined with innovative technology. Its sleek design is complemented by a plush interior that emphasizes comfort and safety, aligning with Volvo's renowned reputation. With advanced features and a focus on sustainability, the ES90 is a testament to the brand's commitment to responsible luxury.

details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Volvo ES90

Costs and Consumption

Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
Price
69,900 - 74,600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Electric Range
706 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
Curb weight
2,610 kg
Trunk capacity
519 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,881 mm
Width
1,942 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
368 - 450 kg
Payload
460 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Power HP
456 - 680 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 - 5.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Torque
670 - 870 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Power kW
335 - 500 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Volvo
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.