VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Volvo EX90 comparison

Compare performance (487 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 72,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Volvo EX90?

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Volvo EX90: Key differences

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.8 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • very slightly more efficient
  • somewhat quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly lighter
details

Volvo EX90

2.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • very slightly more electric range
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Ford Mustang Mach-E is clearly cheaper – starting at 48,400 £ , while the Volvo EX90 costs 72,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 23,734 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is very slightly more efficient: consuming 17.7 kWh/100km compared to 17.8 kWh/100km for the Volvo EX90. That’s a difference of about 0.1 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo EX90 offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 620 km, about 20 km more than the Ford Mustang Mach-E.

EX90

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX90 offers clearly more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 487 HP. That’s roughly 193 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Volvo EX90 takes 4.2 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers marginally more torque with 950 Nm compared to 870 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm more.

Mustang Mach-E

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Volvo EX90 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Mustang Mach-E is slightly lighter – 2,161 kg compared to 2,555 kg. The difference is around 394 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo EX90 carries visibly more – 605 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 155 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX90 shows a few small advantages in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £72,200
EX90

Volvo EX90

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 333 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.8 - 19.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 570 - 620 km
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Volvo EX90

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Mustang Mach-E

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details

Volvo EX90

The Volvo EX90 feels like a Scandinavian fortress on wheels, combining serene luxury with smart safety features that make everyday driving remarkably calm and confident. It dresses cutting-edge electric technology in understated elegance, so buyers who want peace of mind without shouting about it will find it hard to resist.

details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Volvo EX90

Costs and Consumption

Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
Price
72,200 - 91,700 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 19.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Electric Range
570 - 620 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
6 - 7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
Curb weight
2,555 - 2,765 kg
Trunk capacity
519 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,881 mm
Width
1,964 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
368 - 450 kg
Payload
545 - 605 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Power HP
333 - 680 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Torque
480 - 870 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Power kW
245 - 500 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Volvo
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.