Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Volvo XC60 – Differences & prices compared
Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Volvo XC60?
Mustang Mach-E
@ mustang.fordpresskits.com
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Mustang Mach-E has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 48400 £, while the Volvo XC60 costs 49200 £. That’s a price difference of around 763 £.
As for range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E performs clearly better – achieving up to 600 km, about 518 km more than the Volvo XC60.
XC60
@ media.volvocars.com
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E has a barely noticeable edge – offering 487 HP compared to 455 HP. That’s roughly 32 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 3.80 s, while the Volvo XC60 takes 4.90 s. That’s about 1.10 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Mustang Mach-E performs minimal better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Volvo XC60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Mustang Mach-E pulls noticeable stronger with 950 Nm compared to 709 Nm. That’s about 241 Nm difference.
Mustang Mach-E
@ mustang.fordpresskits.com
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Volvo XC60 is somewhat lighter – 1900 kg compared to 2161 kg. The difference is around 261 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers minimal more room – 519 L compared to 483 L. That’s a difference of about 36 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC60 performs slight better – up to 1543 L, which is about 123 L more than the Ford Mustang Mach-E.
When it comes to payload, Volvo XC60 to a small extent takes the win – 550 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 100 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Ford Mustang Mach-E is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £48,400
@ mustang.fordpresskits.com
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Ford Mustang Mach-E
The Ford Mustang Mach-E marks a new chapter in the legacy of the iconic American brand, combining classic muscle car aesthetics with modern electric vehicle technology. Its sleek design captures the spirit of innovation while offering a spacious and tech-savvy interior for enhanced driving comfort. The Mach-E promises an exhilarating driving experience, packed with cutting-edge features that set a new standard for electric SUVs.
details
@ mustang.fordpresskits.com
@ mustang.fordpresskits.com
@ mustang.fordpresskits.com
@ mustang.fordpresskits.com
@ mustang.fordpresskits.com
Volvo XC60
The Volvo XC60 strikes a perfect balance between contemporary design and practical functionality, making it an appealing choice for those in search of a reliable and stylish SUV. Its interior showcases a blend of high-quality materials and innovative technology, ensuring a comfortable and seamless driving experience. With its emphasis on safety and environmental sustainability, the XC60 continues to stand out in the competitive SUV market.
details
@ media.volvocars.com
@ media.volvocars.com
@ media.volvocars.com
@ media.volvocars.com
@ media.volvocars.com
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Volvo XC60
|
@ mustang.fordpresskits.com
|
@ media.volvocars.com
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
48400 - 66900 £
|
Price
49200 - 75100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
|
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
73 - 91 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
64 - 169 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2161 - 2351 kg
|
Curb weight
1900 - 2150 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
519 L
|
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
|
|
Length
4713 - 4743 mm
|
Length
4708 mm
|
|
Width
1881 mm
|
Width
1902 mm
|
|
Height
1613 - 1624 mm
|
Height
1651 - 1655 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1345 - 1420 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1528 - 1543 L
|
|
Payload
368 - 450 kg
|
Payload
510 - 550 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
|
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 - 200 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
|
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
|
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Volvo
|
What drive types are available for the Ford Mustang Mach-E?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.