Compare performance (168 HP vs 300 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 37,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Renault Rafale?
In the realm of compact SUVs, the Ford Puma and the Renault Rafale present an intriguing face-off. Both models are enveloped with innovative engineering, promising to deliver a blend of performance, efficiency, and style. Let's dissect their unique offerings and see how they stack up against each other.
Both the Ford Puma and the Renault Rafale cater to the progressive mindset of contemporary drivers. The Puma's offerings range from the petrol mild-hybrid to a purely electric drivetrain. Its engine capacities top out with a 168 HP unit, ensuring drivers have ample power with a maximum speed reaching up to 210 km/h and an impressive acceleration of 7.4 seconds from 0-100 km/h.
In contrast, Renault's Rafale brings a hybrid approach with full and plug-in hybrid options. It boasts a higher power capability with up to 300 HP, crafting a swifter drive with a 0-100 km/h acceleration in just 6.4 seconds. While the Rafale’s speed maxes out at a respectable 180 km/h, its hybrid nature makes it exceptionally efficient.
The environmental aspects are crucial here. The Puma exhibits fuel consumption between 5.4-6 L/100km, with its electric variant consuming 13.1-13.7 kWh/100km and an electric range up to 376 km. CO2 emissions span from zero (electric) to 136 g/km, depending on the variant.
In comparison, the Rafale shines in its hybrid prowess, delivering a consumption as low as 0.6 L/100km in its plug-in variant, alongside an electric range of 97 km. More eco-conscious drivers will appreciate its CO2 emissions as low as 14 g/km, placing it at the cusp of environmental stewardship.
Both SUVs standardize on front-wheel drive, effectively balancing performance and safety. The Ford Puma provides versatility with its options for manual and automatic transmissions, alongside features like dual-clutch automatic systems. Meanwhile, Renault opts for an automatic gearbox across its lineup, simplifying the experience for those inclined towards effortless driving.
Space optimization is vital in SUVs. The Puma, at a length fluctuating around 4226 mm, offers trunk space between 456-523 L, which should suffice for daily grocery hauls or brief excursions. Chiseled within dimensions of 4710 mm length, the Rafale offers a significantly larger trunk capacity of 627 L, catering to more extensive storage requirements.
Carrying capability is a pragmatic aspect. The Ford Puma presents a payload ranging from 367-469 kg, enabling a mix of passenger comfort and cargo. The Rafale, though heavier in curb weight, offers a slightly lower maximum payload of 447 kg, yet compensates with its cavernous boot space.
The Ford Puma manifests as a dynamic choice for those seeking versatility coupled with the charm of hybrid and electric performance. Its agile frame and spirited engine choices are ideal for urban jungles and the open road alike.
On the other hand, the Renault Rafale beckons with its advanced hybrid systems and capacious interior, perfect for eco-conscious drivers who relish long journeys. Its advanced CO2 profile and comprehensive utility make it a formidable contender.
In essence, your choice between the Ford Puma and Renault Rafale rests upon what you prioritize in an SUV — be it performance, efficiency, or space. Both vehicles carry the torch of innovation, ready to sculpt the future of driving.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma is considerably cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Renault Rafale costs 37,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,800 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Rafale uses 2 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 3.4 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers substantially more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 320 km more than the Renault Rafale.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Renault Rafale offers clearly more power – delivering 300 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 132 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Rafale is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 6.4 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is visibly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,734 kg. The difference is around 418 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries marginally more – 469 kg compared to 444 kg. That’s a difference of about 25 kg.
The Renault Rafale is narrowly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
The Renault Rafale dresses bold coupé-inspired lines around a practical crossover body, turning heads without trying too hard. Inside it serves up a comfortable, well-equipped cabin and engaging driving manners, making it a clever choice for buyers who want a bit of panache with their daily commute.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
37,700 - 49,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2 - 5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
97 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
43 - 109 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,734 - 2,025 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
539 - 627 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,886 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
415 - 444 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
200 - 300 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 8.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
147 - 221 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Renault
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España