VS

Ford Ranger vs Toyota RAV4 comparison

Compare performance (281 HP vs 309 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 37,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Toyota RAV4?

Ford Ranger vs Toyota RAV4: Key differences

Ford Ranger

details

Toyota RAV4

4.8 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • only slightly more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • clearly more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • significantly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ranger

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Toyota RAV4 is markedly cheaper – starting at 37,700 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,734 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota RAV4 uses 1.3 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Ford Ranger with 3.1 L/100km. The difference is about 1.8 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Toyota RAV4 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 137 km, about 95 km more than the Ford Ranger.

RAV4

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota RAV4 offers only slightly more power – delivering 309 HP compared to 281 HP. That’s roughly 28 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota RAV4 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 8.7 s. That’s about 2.9 s quicker.

Ranger

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Toyota RAV4 is significantly lighter – 1,655 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 750 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries markedly more – 989 kg compared to 610 kg. That’s a difference of about 379 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota RAV4 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,700
RAV4

Toyota RAV4

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 185 - 309 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.3 - 5.3 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 133 - 137 km
details

Frequently compared as well

BYD Seal U
Toyota RAV4
VS
BYD Seal U is a sleek, driver‑focused electric newcomer that delivers brisk, silent acceleration, cutting‑edge tech and impressive running‑cost savings — it’s the car that makes you forget what an internal‑combustion soundtrack sounded like. The Toyota RAV4 sticks to its strengths: rugged, roomy …
Toyota RAV4
Volvo XC60
VS
The Toyota RAV4 is the no-nonsense, go-anywhere compact SUV that scores on reliability, fuel economy and roomy practicality — ideal if you want low fuss, sensible running costs and maximum value. The Volvo XC60 swaps thrift for Scandinavian refinement, with a classier cabin, advanced safety tech …
Ford Ranger
Toyota RAV4

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.

details
CAF9EC78-BCC5-44DD-A6CB-AA214C4B486C
A5679221-BE7E-4493-B2BF-37FB664B42A8

Reviews Ford Ranger

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Toyota RAV4

The Toyota RAV4 is a well-rounded compact SUV that pairs everyday practicality with a comfortable, composed ride and generous cargo space, making it a sensible choice for families and active lifestyles. Its strong reputation for reliability, efficient drivetrains, and straightforward technology gives it wide appeal whether you value economy, comfort, or capability.

details
73487-rav4prexterior34front-web-lr
73488-rav4prexterior34rear-web-lr
77636-2023rav4ext001-web-lr
73489-rav4printeriordashboard-web-lr

Reviews Toyota RAV4

4.8 (8 Reviews)
rate
Mariana González
5 Jan 2026, 23:15:27

I love it — it’s super comfortable, I’ve never had any trouble with it, very reliable and stable.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Toyota RAV4
Dacia Bigster
VS
Put the ever-reliable Toyota RAV4 next to the newcomer Dacia Bigster and you get two sensible SUVs with very different appeals: the RAV4 delivers years of refinement, hybrid efficiency and a quietly premium cabin, while the Bigster trades polish for cavernous space and a wallet-friendly price. If …
Toyota Corolla Touring Sports
Toyota RAV4
VS
The Corolla Touring Sports is the pragmatic estate: lower, nimbler and generally more economical, with a clever loadbay that keeps luggage organized without the SUV tax. The RAV4, by contrast, gives you a taller driving position, more interior room and light off‑road chops — it's the tougher, more …
Skoda Kodiaq
Toyota RAV4
VS
If you need seven seats, cavernous boot space and a grown-up ride, the Škoda Kodiaq is the sensible family hero that gets the job done without drama; it’s spacious, refined and embarrasses smaller SUVs at the supermarket run. The Toyota RAV4, meanwhile, is the rugged, hybrid-savvy all-rounder — …
Suzuki Across
Toyota RAV4
VS
The Suzuki Across feels like the RAV4's cheeky twin — the same sharp plug‑in hybrid drivetrain and near-identical performance, just wearing Suzuki's badge and a slightly different face. If you want proven Toyota ubiquity and resale strength, stick with the RAV4; if you fancy the same tech with a …
Mazda CX-60
Toyota RAV4
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like the small SUV that went to design school — rear-driven poise, a near-luxury cabin and punchy petrol or PHEV options that reward drivers who crave refinement and involvement. The Toyota RAV4, by contrast, is the stubbornly sensible choice: roomier, more practical, famously …
Mercedes GLC
Toyota RAV4
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the Mercedes GLC and the Toyota RAV4, the luxurious GLC excels in offering a refined driving experience and premium interior materials that define its upscale appeal. Meanwhile, the RAV4 impresses with its practicality, reliability, and advanced safety features, …
Ford Ranger
Maxus T60 MAX
VS
Unsure whether the Ford Ranger or the Maxus T60 MAX is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Nissan Qashqai
Toyota RAV4
VS
Nissan's Qashqai is the urbane compact crossover that prioritises comfort, slick cabin tech and a city-friendly footprint, while Toyota's RAV4 leans into rugged practicality, bigger boot space and available hybrid power for long-distance economy. Choose the Qashqai if you want a refined, …
Ford Ranger
Toyota RAV4

Costs and Consumption
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
Price
37,700 - 54,200 £
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.3 - 5.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
42 km
Electric Range
133 - 137 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
70 - 265 g/km
co2
30 - 121 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Pickup
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
Curb weight
1,655 - 1,960 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
446 - 514 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,918 mm
Width
1,880 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
845 - 989 kg
Payload
515 - 610 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
Power HP
185 - 309 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
Power kW
136 - 227 kW
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
Engine capacity
2,487 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
Brand
Ford
Brand
Toyota
What drivetrain options does the Ford Ranger have?

The Ford Ranger is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.