Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Tourneo Connect vs Skoda Karoq comparison
Compare performance (150 HP vs 190 HP), boot space and price (27,300 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Tourneo Connect or Skoda Karoq?
Ford Tourneo Connect vs Skoda Karoq: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Tourneo Connect
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Tourneo Connect is only slightly cheaper – starting at 27,300 £ , while the Skoda Karoq costs 29,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,740 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Tourneo Connect uses 0.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Skoda Karoq with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 4.4 L/100km.
Karoq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Karoq offers clearly more power – delivering 190 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 40 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Karoq is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 7 s, while the Ford Tourneo Connect takes 10.1 s. That’s about 3.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Karoq delivers marginally more torque with 360 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.
Tourneo Connect
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Karoq is a bit lighter – 1,380 kg compared to 1,542 kg. The difference is around 162 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Tourneo Connect offers substantially more boot space – 1,720 L compared to 521 L. That’s a difference of about 1,199 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Tourneo Connect carries clearly more – 818 kg compared to 549 kg. That’s a difference of about 269 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Tourneo Connect is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £27,300
Ford Tourneo Connect
Ford Tourneo Connect
Skoda Karoq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Tourneo Connect
The Ford Tourneo Connect is a practical, surprisingly polished people-mover that balances family-friendly flexibility with car-like driving manners. With clever storage, sliding doors and a bright, airy cabin it’s a smart choice for buyers who want sensible versatility without sacrificing everyday comfort — and it’s oddly enjoyable to drive for its size.
details
Skoda Karoq
Skoda Karoq is a smartly packaged compact SUV that balances practical family-friendly space with composed handling, making daily drives feel easy and assured. Its straightforward design, roomy cabin with clever storage solutions, and sensible equipment make it a strong choice for buyers seeking value and versatility without fuss.
details
Ford Tourneo Connect
Skoda Karoq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,300 - 41,900 £
|
Price
29,100 - 41,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 7.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
116 - 119 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
11 - 164 g/km
|
co2
128 - 173 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,542 - 1,781 kg
|
Curb weight
1,380 - 1,655 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
1,213 - 1,720 L
|
Trunk capacity
521 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
Width
1,841 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
563 - 818 kg
|
Payload
456 - 549 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 190 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 13.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 11.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
220 - 350 Nm
|
Torque
200 - 360 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 140 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.