VS

Ford Transit Connect vs Renault Arkana comparison

Compare performance (122 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (30,800 £ vs 28,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Connect or Renault Arkana?

Ford Transit Connect vs Renault Arkana: Key differences

Ford Transit Connect

details

Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • barely cheaper
  • slightly more power
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Transit Connect

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Renault Arkana is barely cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the Ford Transit Connect costs 30,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,347 £.

Arkana

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Arkana offers slightly more power – delivering 143 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 21 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Arkana is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 10.8 s, while the Ford Transit Connect takes 11.4 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Connect delivers visibly more torque with 320 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 115 Nm more.

Transit Connect

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Renault Arkana offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is barely lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 1,575 kg. The difference is around 65 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Transit Connect carries substantially more – 780 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 329 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Arkana holds a slight edge in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £28,500
Arkana

Renault Arkana

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 143 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.7 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
Here’s a straightforward comparison between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Symbioz to help you decide which fits your needs. The Arkana is a production compact crossover focused on practicality and hybrid efficiency, while the Symbioz is Renault’s forward-looking electric concept showcasing …
Renault Arkana
Renault Austral
VS
Choosing between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Austral comes down to whether you want a coupe‑styled compact SUV that prioritises flair and efficiency (Arkana) or a more conventional family SUV that emphasises space and refinement (Austral). This comparison will cut through the marketing to …
Ford Transit Connect
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Transit Connect

The Ford Transit Connect is the go-to compact workhorse for urban professionals who need cargo space without driving a full-size van. It balances practicality and everyday manners with clever storage ideas and a surprisingly comfortable ride, making it a sensible choice for small businesses and families who value function over flair.

details
98B296E7-C10F-4999-B4D2-428B46A9DF09
2018_FORD_TRANSIT_Kombi__18
2018_FORD_TRANSIT__12

Reviews Ford Transit Connect

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Renault Arkana

The Renault Arkana turns heads with its coupe-like roofline and SUV practicality, offering stylish presence without pretending to be a supercar. It feels composed and economical on everyday roads, making it a savvy choice for buyers who want flair and sensible running costs with a wink rather than a roar.

details
r210653p
r210654p
r210665p
r210657p
r210613p
r210616p

Reviews Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
Sonja
8 Apr 2026, 14:14:58

We've been driving the Arkana RS Line mild-hybrid for almost five years — and we're mega satisfied. At first everyone turned to stare. It's a good car to cover motorway miles, and fuel consumption of about 6.4 l/100 km is acceptable. Since our contract is ending, we're parting with the Arkana despite the lovely years together and switching to the Symbioz full-hybrid 160 Alpine Line. Hopefully we'll have a great time with it too.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Cesare
29 Jan 2026, 09:29:59

An excellent compromise between styling, practicality, space and fuel consumption. It’s not a sporty coupe, but practical for everyday use, with balanced purchase and running costs.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Hans Persson
19 Sept 2025, 16:05:49

An almost fully equipped car that's economical and stylish.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Transit Connect
VW Caddy
VS
The Ford Transit Connect and the VW Caddy are two of the most popular compact vans for small businesses and urban operators, offering a practical mix of cargo space, fuel economy and maneuverability. Choose the Transit Connect if you want slightly more load flexibility and car-like driving …
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Arkana
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Nissan Qashqai stands out with its spacious interior and advanced safety features, making it a top choice for families. Meanwhile, the Renault Arkana offers a more stylish coupe-SUV design, appealing to those looking for a distinctive aesthetic without …
Ford Tourneo Connect
Ford Transit Connect
VS
In the realm of versatile vans, the Ford Tourneo Connect and the Ford Transit Connect stand out as formidable contenders, each catering to different practical needs. The Tourneo Connect is lauded for its passenger-friendly design, offering a comfortable ride with ample seating and advanced …
Ford Transit Connect
Peugeot Partner
VS
In the bustling world of compact vans, the Ford Transit Connect and the Peugeot Partner stand out for their practicality and efficiency. The Ford Transit Connect boasts a robust engine and versatile cargo configurations, making it a favorite for business owners needing reliable load transport. On …
Renault Arkana
Toyota C-HR
VS
Renault Arkana and Toyota C-HR go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Renault Arkana or the …
Renault Arkana
Renault Rafale
VS
The Renault Arkana and Renault Rafale represent two different takes on Renault's crossover line-up: the Arkana is a compact, value-focused coupe-SUV, while the Rafale aims higher as a larger, more premium fastback crossover packed with technology. This comparison strips away the marketing to help …
Kia Sportage
Renault Arkana
VS
Kia Sportage and Renault Arkana go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Kia Sportage or the …
Nissan Juke
Renault Arkana
VS
Nissan Juke and Renault Arkana go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Nissan Juke or the …
Ford Transit Connect
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,800 - 35,300 £
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
-
co2
106 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,620 kg
Curb weight
1,510 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,855 mm
Width
1,821 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
775 - 780 kg
Payload
451 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
122 HP
Power HP
143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.4 - 11.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
320 Nm
Torque
205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
90 kW
Power kW
105 kW
Engine capacity
1,968 cm3
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
-
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Ford
Brand
Renault
What drive types are available for the Ford Transit Connect?

The Ford Transit Connect is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.