VS

Ford Transit Courier vs Mitsubishi Outlander comparison

Compare performance (136 HP vs 306 HP), boot space and price (20,700 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Courier or Mitsubishi Outlander?

Ford Transit Courier vs Mitsubishi Outlander: Key differences

Ford Transit Courier

  • substantially cheaper
  • clearly more electric range
  • substantially lighter
details

Mitsubishi Outlander

4.7 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • clearly more efficient
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Transit Courier

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Ford Transit Courier is substantially cheaper – starting at 20,700 £ , while the Mitsubishi Outlander costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 22,193 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Outlander uses 2.6 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Ford Transit Courier with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 2.7 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Transit Courier offers clearly more range – reaching up to 325 km, about 240 km more than the Mitsubishi Outlander.

Outlander

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi Outlander offers clearly more power – delivering 306 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 170 HP more horsepower.

Transit Courier

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Transit Courier is substantially lighter – 1,378 kg compared to 2,156 kg. The difference is around 778 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Transit Courier carries noticeably more – 701 kg compared to 529 kg. That’s a difference of about 172 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Transit Courier holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £20,700
Transit Courier

Ford Transit Courier

  • Engine Type Petrol, Diesel, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 100 - 136 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.3 - 6.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 325 km
Ford Transit Courier
Mitsubishi Outlander

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Transit Courier

The Ford Transit Courier is a compact, city-friendly van that hides surprising practicality behind a neat, no-nonsense exterior. Ideal for small businesses and urban runs, it pairs easy maneuverability and clever load solutions with a colleague-friendly driving position — proof that you don't need a giant van to get big jobs done.

details

Mitsubishi Outlander

The Mitsubishi Outlander is a sensible family SUV that blends roomy practicality with a calm, assured ride—ideal for school runs and weekend getaways. It won’t set pulses racing, but its tidy interior, straightforward equipment and low-stress ownership make it a smart, unfussy pick for buyers who prefer reliability over flash.

details
Ford Transit Courier
Mitsubishi Outlander

Costs and Consumption

Price
20,700 - 31,900 £
Price
42,800 - 54,600 £
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 6.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 2.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
325 km
Electric Range
83 - 85 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 158 g/km
co2
60 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,378 - 1,549 kg
Curb weight
2,156 - 2,232 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
498 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,800 mm
Width
1,862 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
529 - 701 kg
Payload
453 - 529 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel, Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
-
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
-
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
100 - 136 HP
Power HP
306 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
74 - 100 kW
Power kW
225 kW
Engine capacity
998 - 1,499 cm3
Engine capacity
2,360 cm3

General

Model Year
2,023 - 2,026
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mitsubishi
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.