VS

Ford Transit Transporter vs Citroen Jumper comparison

Compare performance (269 HP vs 279 HP), boot space and price (39,900 £ vs 55,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Citroen Jumper?

Ford Transit Transporter vs Citroen Jumper: Key differences

Ford Transit Transporter

  • visibly cheaper
  • visibly more efficient
  • clearly lighter

Citroen Jumper

  • marginally more power
  • very slightly more electric range

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Transit Transporter

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Ford Transit Transporter is visibly cheaper – starting at 39,900 £ , while the Citroen Jumper costs 55,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,147 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Transit Transporter is visibly more efficient: consuming 21.3 kWh/100km compared to 26.2 kWh/100km for the Citroen Jumper. That’s a difference of about 4.9 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Citroen Jumper offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 424 km, about 22 km more than the Ford Transit Transporter.

Jumper

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Citroen Jumper offers marginally more power – delivering 279 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 10 HP more horsepower.

Looking at top speed, the Citroen Jumper is only slightly faster – reaching 130 km/h, while the Ford Transit Transporter tops out at 120 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Transporter delivers only slightly more torque with 430 Nm compared to 410 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm more.

Transit Transporter

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 3.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Transit Transporter is clearly lighter – 2,074 kg compared to 2,865 kg. The difference is around 791 kg.

For maximum load capacity, the Citroen Jumper offers a bit more capacity – up to 17,000 L, about 2,900 L more than the Ford Transit Transporter.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Transit Transporter carries clearly more – 2,607 kg compared to 1,385 kg. That’s a difference of about 1,222 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Transit Transporter is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £39,900
Transit Transporter

Ford Transit Transporter

  • Engine Type : Diesel, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 105 - 269 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 7.9 - 10.3 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 21.3 - 32 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 247 - 402 km
Ford Transit Transporter
Citroen Jumper

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Transit Transporter

The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.

details

Citroen Jumper

The Citroen Jumper is a no-nonsense workhorse that swaps flash for sheer practicality, with a spacious load area and composed, user-friendly driving manners that make busy workdays easier. It won’t win any beauty contests, but its sensible packaging, comfortable cab and wallet-friendly running make it a compelling choice for tradespeople and small businesses.

details
Ford Transit Transporter
Citroen Jumper

Costs and Consumption

Price
39,900 - 73,000 £
Price
55,100 - 57,800 £
Consumption L/100km
7.9 - 10.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
21.3 - 32 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
26.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
247 - 402 km
Electric Range
424 km
Battery Capacity
68 kWh
Battery Capacity
97.8 kWh
co2
0 - 270 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
3 - 6
Seats
3
Doors
4
Doors
4
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,765 kg
Curb weight
2,865 - 2,940 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
5,531 - 6,704 mm
Length
5,998 - 6,363 mm
Width
2,059 mm
Width
2,050 mm
Height
2,530 - 2,778 mm
Height
2,612 - 2,850 mm
Max trunk capacity
9,300 - 14,100 L
Max trunk capacity
13,000 - 17,000 L
Payload
735 - 2,607 kg
Payload
560 - 1,385 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
105 - 269 HP
Power HP
279 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
120 km/h
Max Speed
90 - 130 km/h
Torque
310 - 430 Nm
Torque
410 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
77 - 198 kW
Power kW
205 kW
Engine capacity
1,996 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,019 - 2,024
Model Year
2,024
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Citroen
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.