Compare performance (269 HP vs 156 HP), boot space and price (67,300 £ vs 22,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Jeep Avenger?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Jeep Avenger is substantially cheaper – starting at 22,500 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 44,767 £.
As for electric range, the Ford Transit Transporter offers barely more range – reaching up to 402 km, about 2 km more than the Jeep Avenger.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter offers significantly more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 113 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Transporter delivers markedly more torque with 430 Nm compared to 260 Nm. That’s about 170 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The Jeep Avenger comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe Jeep Avenger mixes rugged styling with a compact, city‑friendly footprint that makes it easy to maneuver while keeping Jeep’s adventurous character. Inside it offers a practical, modern cabin with sensible tech and comfort aimed at everyday driving and light weekend getaways.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
Price
22,500 - 36,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
400 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 129 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
1,180 - 1,520 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
325 - 380 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,776 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
490 - 502 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Jeep
|