Compare performance (269 HP vs 130 HP), boot space and price (39,900 £ vs 25,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Renault Kangoo?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Renault Kangoo is significantly cheaper – starting at 25,700 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 39,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,219 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Kangoo uses 5.2 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Ford Transit Transporter with 7.9 L/100km. The difference is about 2.7 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Renault Kangoo is marginally more efficient: consuming 20.2 kWh/100km compared to 21.3 kWh/100km for the Ford Transit Transporter. That’s a difference of about 1.1 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Transit Transporter offers visibly more range – reaching up to 402 km, about 117 km more than the Renault Kangoo.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter offers significantly more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 139 HP more horsepower.
Looking at top speed, the Renault Kangoo is slightly faster – reaching 135 km/h, while the Ford Transit Transporter tops out at 120 km/h. The difference is around 15 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Transporter delivers clearly more torque with 430 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 160 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Renault Kangoo offers more seats – 7 vs 6.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Kangoo is noticeably lighter – 1,489 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 585 kg.
For maximum load capacity, the Ford Transit Transporter offers substantially more capacity – up to 14,100 L, about 11,050 L more than the Renault Kangoo.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Transit Transporter carries substantially more – 2,607 kg compared to 610 kg. That’s a difference of about 1,997 kg.
The Ford Transit Transporter is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe Renault Kangoo is the pragmatic chameleon of small vans, marrying van-like practicality with carlike comfort and a cheerful, friendly face that suits both family runs and workday hauls. It's sensible, versatile and annoyingly useful — easy to live with, cheap to run and clever where it counts, so you get more space and fewer compromises than the price suggests.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
39,900 - 73,000 £
|
Price
25,700 - 36,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
7.9 - 10.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 7.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
21.3 - 32 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
20.2 - 21.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
247 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
278 - 285 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
68 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 270 g/km
|
co2
0 - 168 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,765 kg
|
Curb weight
1,489 - 2,041 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
500 - 950 L
|
|
Length
5,531 - 6,704 mm
|
Length
4,486 - 4,911 mm
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,860 - 1,919 mm
|
|
Height
2,530 - 2,778 mm
|
Height
1,838 - 1,869 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
9,300 - 14,100 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2,500 - 3,050 L
|
|
Payload
735 - 2,607 kg
|
Payload
459 - 610 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
105 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 130 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 16.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
120 km/h
|
Max Speed
130 - 135 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 - 430 Nm
|
Torque
240 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
77 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,996 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,461 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,019 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, F, E
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Renault
|