Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Ford Transit Transporter or Renault Kangoo?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Renault Kangoo has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23100 £, while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 39900 £. That’s a price difference of around 16876 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Kangoo manages with 5.20 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Ford Transit Transporter with 7.90 L. The difference is about 2.70 L per 100 km.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Renault Kangoo: with 20.20 kWh per 100 km, it’s minimal more efficient than the Ford Transit Transporter with 21.30 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.10 kWh.
As for range, the Ford Transit Transporter performs to a small extent better – achieving up to 317 km, about 32 km more than the Renault Kangoo.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter has a convincingly edge – offering 269 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 139 HP more horsepower.
In terms of top speed, the Renault Kangoo performs noticeable better – reaching 184 km/h, while the Ford Transit Transporter tops out at 120 km/h. The difference is around 64 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Transit Transporter pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 430 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 160 Nm difference.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Renault Kangoo offers to a small extent more seating capacity – 7 vs 6.
In curb weight, Renault Kangoo is clearly perceptible lighter – 1585 kg compared to 2074 kg. The difference is around 489 kg.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Transit Transporter performs significantly better – up to 14100 L, which is about 11050 L more than the Renault Kangoo.
When it comes to payload, Ford Transit Transporter clearly takes the win – 2607 kg compared to 609 kg. That’s a difference of about 1998 kg.
Overall, the Ford Transit Transporter shows itself to be leaves the rival little chance and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
The Ford Transit Transporter has long been a staple in the commercial vehicle sector, renowned for its reliability and versatility. It offers a comfortable cabin with a modern design that enhances the driving experience, making long journeys more enjoyable. With a focus on practicality, the Transit provides ample cargo space, meeting the demands of businesses and individual users alike.
detailsThe Renault Kangoo high-roof van delivers a practical and versatile solution for both family and commercial use, with its spacious interior and adaptable seating arrangements. Its modern design and user-friendly features provide comfort and convenience, making it an appealing option for those needing a reliable workhorse. Additionally, the efficient engine options ensure a balanced approach to performance, keeping running costs manageable for everyday driving.
details|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
39900 - 69100 £
|
Price
23100 - 36200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
7.9 - 10.3 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 7.1 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
21.3 - 32 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
20.2 - 21.5 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
247 - 317 km
|
Electric Range
278 - 285 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
68 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 270 g/km
|
co2
0 - 161 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2074 - 2765 kg
|
Curb weight
1585 - 2041 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
500 - 950 L
|
|
Length
5531 - 6704 mm
|
Length
4486 - 4911 mm
|
|
Width
2059 mm
|
Width
1860 - 1919 mm
|
|
Height
2530 - 2778 mm
|
Height
1838 - 1869 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
9300 - 14100 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1296 - 3050 L
|
|
Payload
735 - 2607 kg
|
Payload
400 - 609 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
105 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 130 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 15.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
120 km/h
|
Max Speed
130 - 184 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 - 430 Nm
|
Torque
200 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
77 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1996 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1332 - 1461 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2019 - 2024
|
Model Year
2022 - 2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Renault
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.