Compare performance (269 HP vs 130 HP), boot space and price (67,300 £ vs 25,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Renault Kangoo?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Renault Kangoo is significantly cheaper – starting at 25,700 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 41,595 £.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter offers significantly more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 139 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Transporter delivers clearly more torque with 430 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 160 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Renault Kangoo offers more seats – 7 vs 6.
The Ford Transit Transporter is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe Renault Kangoo is the pragmatic chameleon of small vans, marrying van-like practicality with carlike comfort and a cheerful, friendly face that suits both family runs and workday hauls. It's sensible, versatile and annoyingly useful — easy to live with, cheap to run and clever where it counts, so you get more space and fewer compromises than the price suggests.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
Price
25,700 - 32,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 7.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
136 - 168 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
1,489 - 1,830 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
500 - 775 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,860 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
459 - 610 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 130 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 16.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
Torque
240 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,461 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Renault
|