Compare performance (269 HP vs 428 HP), boot space and price (67,300 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Volvo EX30?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Volvo EX30 is significantly cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 37,318 £.
As for electric range, the Volvo EX30 offers moderately more range – reaching up to 475 km, about 73 km more than the Ford Transit Transporter.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX30 offers markedly more power – delivering 428 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 159 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX30 delivers clearly more torque with 543 Nm compared to 430 Nm. That’s about 113 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The Volvo EX30 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe Volvo EX30 is a compact all-electric crossover that mixes Volvo's strong safety focus with clean Scandinavian design for a really city-friendly package. It feels lively and easy to live with, pairing a premium-feeling interior and modern connectivity with a practical footprint for urban driving.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
Price
30,000 - 47,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17 - 18.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
339 - 475 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
1,840 - 1,960 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
318 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,838 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
370 - 390 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 428 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
Torque
343 - 543 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 315 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Volvo
|