Compare performance (171 HP vs 82 HP), boot space and price (33,400 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – GWM ORA 03 or Suzuki Swift?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the world of compact hatchbacks, two distinct models are shaking things up: the GWM ORA 03 and the Suzuki Swift. As automakers continue to push the boundaries of innovation, both models bring something unique to the table. From electric propulsion to hybrid technology, let's dive into what makes these cars stand out.
The GWM ORA 03 is an all-electric marvel powered by a motor producing 171 horsepower and 126 kW, driving the front wheels. This zero-emissions hatchback features a commendable electric range of up to 420 kilometers, depending on the battery capacity selected: 45.4 kWh or 59.3 kWh. With a low consumption rate of approximately 16.7 kWh per 100 km, it's designed for efficiency.
Conversely, the Suzuki Swift opts for a petrol mild-hybrid electric vehicle (MHEV) setup, offering a blend of traditional and hybrid tech. Its 1.2-liter engine generates 82 horsepower, with power transmitted via a manual gearbox or a continuously variable transmission (CVT). Though it offers a lower power output compared to the ORA 03, the Swift touts excellent fuel economy, consuming between 4.4 and 4.9 liters per 100 km.
Acceleration is a strong suit for the GWM ORA 03, sprinting from 0 to 100 km/h in just over 8 seconds. It provides a smooth and quiet ride typical of electric vehicles, complemented by a maximum speed of 160 km/h. On the practical side, the ORA 03 carries a curb weight of 1615 to 1655 kg and can handle a payload ranging from 315 to 355 kg.
The Suzuki Swift, being a lighter competitor with a curb weight around 1069 to 1145 kg, offers agility that is a hallmark of the model. Its maximum speed ranges between 160 and 170 km/h, ensuring a sprightly performance in a compact package. Its torque of 112 Nm, while modest, is sufficient for city driving and casual road trips.
Both hatchbacks comfortably seat five passengers, yet differ in dimensions. The GWM ORA 03 stretches a bit longer and wider, with an overall length of 4235 to 4254 mm and width of up to 1848 mm, providing a roomy feel, although its trunk capacity is slightly lower at 228 liters.
The Suzuki Swift, slightly more compact with a length of 3860 mm and a width of 1735 mm, offers a trunk capacity of 265 liters. It thus presents a better solution for drivers needing additional cargo space in a smaller frame.
ORA 03 champions sustainability with its full-electric setup, boasting a CO2 emission of 0 g/km and earning an 'A' for CO2 efficiency. This aligns with the growing demand for cleaner mobility solutions.
Meanwhile, the Suzuki Swift merges efficiency with its hybrid technology, although its CO2 emissions range from 98 to 110 g/km and hold a 'C' efficiency class. Its mild hybrid system is a nod toward environmental consciousness while maintaining the affordability of traditional engines.
The decision between the GWM ORA 03 and the Suzuki Swift primarily hinges on what you prioritize in a hatchback. The ORA 03 is ideal for those looking for a modern, fully electric ride with good range, performance, and leading-edge sustainability. On the other hand, the Suzuki Swift caters to those desiring a hybrid experience in a compact, nimble frame with excellent fuel economy and engine efficiency.
In the realm of hatchbacks, both vehicles bring innovative features and benefits, ensuring that no matter the choice, drivers will enjoy a blend of efficiency, performance, and technology.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Suzuki Swift is clearly cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the GWM ORA 03 costs 33,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,278 £.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the GWM ORA 03 offers substantially more power – delivering 171 HP compared to 82 HP. That’s roughly 89 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the GWM ORA 03 delivers considerably more torque with 250 Nm compared to 112 Nm. That’s about 138 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Swift is substantially lighter – 1,069 kg compared to 1,615 kg. The difference is around 546 kg.
When it comes to payload, the GWM ORA 03 carries moderately more – 355 kg compared to 296 kg. That’s a difference of about 59 kg.
The GWM ORA 03 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The ORA 03 is a cheeky, design-led electric compact that pairs bold looks with a surprisingly practical interior, giving buyers a fresh alternative to the usual sober choices. It’s easy to live with day-to-day thanks to clever packaging, modern tech and city-friendly manners, so shoppers after an affordable EV with personality should put the ORA 03 on their shortlist.
details
The Suzuki Swift is a cheeky little hatch that turns city streets into its playground with lively handling and a grin-inducing drive. Practical enough for daily chores, thrifty to run and kinder on your wallet than many rivals, it's a sensible pick for buyers who want fun without drama.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33,400 - 42,400 £
|
Price
17,100 - 21,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 4.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.5 - 16.8 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
310 - 420 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
98 - 110 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,615 - 1,655 kg
|
Curb weight
1,069 - 1,145 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
228 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,825 - 1,848 mm
|
Width
1,735 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
315 - 355 kg
|
Payload
282 - 296 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
171 HP
|
Power HP
82 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 - 8.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 Nm
|
Torque
112 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
126 kW
|
Power kW
61 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,197 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
GWM
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España