VS

GWM ORA 03 vs Volvo EX30 comparison

Compare performance (171 HP vs 428 HP), boot space and price (33,400 £ vs 33,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – GWM ORA 03 or Volvo EX30?

GWM ORA 03 vs Volvo EX30: Key differences

GWM ORA 03

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly more efficient
  • slightly lighter

Volvo EX30

3.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly cheaper
  • clearly more power
  • somewhat more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ORA 03

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Volvo EX30 is very slightly cheaper – starting at 33,000 £ , while the GWM ORA 03 costs 33,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 429 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the GWM ORA 03 is only slightly more efficient: consuming 16.5 kWh/100km compared to 17 kWh/100km for the Volvo EX30. That’s a difference of about 0.5 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo EX30 offers somewhat more range – reaching up to 476 km, about 56 km more than the GWM ORA 03.

EX30

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX30 offers clearly more power – delivering 428 HP compared to 171 HP. That’s roughly 257 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX30 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.6 s, while the GWM ORA 03 takes 8.2 s. That’s about 4.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX30 delivers substantially more torque with 543 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 293 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, GWM ORA 03 is slightly lighter – 1,615 kg compared to 1,840 kg. The difference is around 225 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Volvo EX30 offers markedly more boot space – 318 L compared to 228 L. That’s a difference of about 90 L.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo EX30 carries barely more – 390 kg compared to 355 kg. That’s a difference of about 35 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX30 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £33,000
EX30

Volvo EX30

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 272 - 428 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17 - 18.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 339 - 476 km
details

Frequently compared as well

CUPRA Born
Volvo EX30
VS
In the battle of electric compacts, the CUPRA Born and Volvo EX30 each bring unique strengths to the table for eco-conscious drivers. The CUPRA Born impresses with its sporty design and dynamic handling, making it an ideal choice for those seeking a spirited drive. On the other hand, the Volvo EX30 …
Renault R5
Volvo EX30
VS
The Renault 5 brings playful retro charm and clever city-sized packaging, while the Volvo EX30 feels like a pocket rocket from the future with serious EV range and safety tech. If you want personality and urban thrift go R5, but if you crave rapid electric shove, cutting-edge gadgets and …
GWM ORA 03
Volvo EX30

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

GWM ORA 03

The ORA 03 is a cheeky, design-led electric compact that pairs bold looks with a surprisingly practical interior, giving buyers a fresh alternative to the usual sober choices. It’s easy to live with day-to-day thanks to clever packaging, modern tech and city-friendly manners, so shoppers after an affordable EV with personality should put the ORA 03 on their shortlist.

details
serpimg_viy3F5

Reviews GWM ORA 03

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Volvo EX30

The Volvo EX30 arrives as a compact electric with crisp Scandinavian design and a cheeky personality, proving you can be serious about safety and still enjoy a grin on your commute. Its cabin is cleverly packaged and delightfully easy to live with, offering smart tech and practical touches that make it feel like a grown-up's city car with a sense of fun.

details
313302_Volvo_EX30
313320_Volvo_EX30
313329_Volvo_EX30_interior
313334_Volvo_EX30_interior
313297_Volvo_EX30

Reviews Volvo EX30

3.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
Michael
10 Feb 2026, 21:18:58

...the best electric car we've driven so far. Trouble-free, safe, tidy and easy to use.

The German predecessors (the Wolfsburg group) can be completely forgotten!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Julien B.
10 Feb 2026, 15:47:03

A car that could have been brilliant, ruined by technological dogmatism. Ninety‑five percent of this car’s problems are between the windshield and the steering wheel. The positives are undone by a botched implantation of technology at all costs. Basic functions are hard to access, buried in menus, and the constant, useless warnings and alerts make the experience frustrating and wreck the overall ergonomics. Add recurring issues with the door‑locking system that the dealer can’t fix after several visits, a range far below what’s promised, and a collision‑avoidance system that randomly takes dangerous initiatives, and I can say this is the worst car I’ve ever bought. After several months, I deeply regret this purchase.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Marco
30 Dec 2025, 12:53:45

The onboard tech (tablet) takes too long to learn. It distracts from driving. Not suitable for the nearsighted — the tablet’s distance from your eyes basically forces you to wear trifocals. Letting off the gas slows the car, but it’s overly sensitive and you need time to get used to it. The buzzer for exceeding the speed limit is very annoying, and the system notices changes in road signs late. In short: driving it is stressful.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
NickoNamo
22 Dec 2025, 18:10:11

Compact, attractive and—above all—safe car with a modern interior.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Volvo EX30
Volvo EX40
VS
In the rapidly growing electric vehicle market, the Volvo EX30 and EX40 stand out with their unique blend of style and sustainability. While the EX30 offers a smaller, more urban-friendly footprint, the EX40 boasts additional space and features tailored for family-oriented drivers. Both models …
Volvo EX30
VW ID.3
VS
The Volvo EX30 arrives as a compact, sharply tuned EV with Scandinavian flair — sprightly, surprisingly premium and built to put a grin on urban commutes. The VW ID.3, by contrast, plays the sensible family card with more interior space, comfort and range options, so pick the EX30 for driving fun …
Volvo EX30
ZEEKR X
VS
Volvo EX30 and ZEEKR X go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Ford Puma
Volvo EX30
VS
The Ford Puma and the Volvo EX30 stand as distinctive options in the compact SUV market, each catering to different preferences. The Ford Puma charms with its sporty handling and youthful appeal, delivering an engaging drive with modern tech features. In contrast, the Volvo EX30 captivates with its …
Volvo EX30
Volvo EC40
VS
Volvo EX30 and Volvo EC40 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Volvo EX30
Polestar 4
VS
Unsure whether the Volvo EX30 or the Polestar 4 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
GWM ORA 03
BYD Atto 2
VS
GWM ORA 03 and BYD Atto 2 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
MINI Countryman
Volvo EX30
VS
In the clash between the MINI Countryman and the Volvo EX30, two distinct faces of modern automotive engineering come to the fore. The MINI Countryman offers a quirky charm coupled with agile handling, appealing to those who seek compact versatility and British flair in their drive. On the other …
GWM ORA 03
Volvo EX30

Costs and Consumption
Price
33,400 - 42,400 £
Price
33,000 - 49,100 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.5 - 16.8 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17 - 18.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
310 - 420 km
Electric Range
339 - 476 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
49 - 65 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,615 - 1,655 kg
Curb weight
1,840 - 1,960 kg
Trunk capacity
228 L
Trunk capacity
318 L
Length
-
Length
4,233 mm
Width
1,825 - 1,848 mm
Width
1,838 mm
Height
-
Height
1,550 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,000 L
Payload
315 - 355 kg
Payload
370 - 390 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
171 HP
Power HP
272 - 428 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 - 8.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 5.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
250 Nm
Torque
343 - 543 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
126 kW
Power kW
200 - 315 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,024
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
GWM
Brand
Volvo
What drivetrain options does the GWM ORA 03 have?

The GWM ORA 03 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.