VS

GWM ORA 07 vs BYD Atto 3 comparison

Compare performance (408 HP vs 449 HP), boot space and price (36,000 £ vs 38,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – GWM ORA 07 or BYD Atto 3?

GWM ORA 07 vs BYD Atto 3: Key differences

GWM ORA 07

  • barely cheaper
  • only slightly more electric range
details

BYD Atto 3

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • barely more power
  • only slightly more efficient
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter
  • clearly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ORA 07

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

GWM ORA 07 is barely cheaper – starting at 36,000 £ , while the BYD Atto 3 costs 38,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,571 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the BYD Atto 3 is only slightly more efficient: consuming 16.4 kWh/100km compared to 16.5 kWh/100km for the GWM ORA 07. That’s a difference of about 0.1 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the GWM ORA 07 offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 520 km, about 10 km more than the BYD Atto 3.

Atto 3

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the BYD Atto 3 offers barely more power – delivering 449 HP compared to 408 HP. That’s roughly 41 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Atto 3 is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the GWM ORA 07 takes 4.5 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the GWM ORA 07 delivers moderately more torque with 680 Nm compared to 560 Nm. That’s about 120 Nm more.

ORA 07

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, BYD Atto 3 is marginally lighter – 1,880 kg compared to 2,065 kg. The difference is around 185 kg.

Looking at boot space, the BYD Atto 3 offers clearly more boot space – 490 L compared to 333 L. That’s a difference of about 157 L.

When it comes to payload, the BYD Atto 3 carries visibly more – 530 kg compared to 350 kg. That’s a difference of about 180 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BYD Atto 3 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £38,600
Atto 3

BYD Atto 3

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 313 - 449 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.4 - 17.8 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 470 - 510 km
GWM ORA 07
BYD Atto 3

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

GWM ORA 07

The GWM ORA 07 arrives as a cheeky, fashion-forward electric crossover that blends retro-modern styling with practical everyday sense, so it’s as happy in city traffic as it is turning heads on the boulevard. Inside you get a comfy, tech-rich cabin and sensible packaging without a premium sticker, making it a smart pick for buyers who want personality and value in one neat package.

details

BYD Atto 3

The BYD Atto 3 is an electric crossover that blends a distinctive, modern design with a comfortable, well-equipped cabin suited to everyday family use. It offers a relaxed, smooth driving feel and practical running costs, making it a sensible choice if you want an uncomplicated, value-focused EV.

details
GWM ORA 07
BYD Atto 3

Costs and Consumption

Price
36,000 - 45,800 £
Price
38,600 - 43,700 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.5 - 17.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.4 - 17.8 kWh/100km
Electric Range
440 - 520 km
Electric Range
470 - 510 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,210 kg
Curb weight
1,880 - 1,990 kg
Trunk capacity
333 L
Trunk capacity
490 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,862 mm
Width
1,875 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
350 kg
Payload
530 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 408 HP
Power HP
313 - 449 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 8.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 5.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
340 - 680 Nm
Torque
380 - 560 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
150 - 300 kW
Power kW
230 - 330 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
GWM
Brand
BYD
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.