VS

GWM ORA 07 vs Toyota C-HR comparison

Compare performance (408 HP vs 223 HP), boot space and price (36,000 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – GWM ORA 07 or Toyota C-HR?

GWM ORA 07 vs Toyota C-HR: Key differences

GWM ORA 07

  • substantially more power
  • substantially more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Toyota C-HR

4.6 (12 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • markedly lighter
  • visibly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ORA 07

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Toyota C-HR is visibly cheaper – starting at 29,100 £ , while the GWM ORA 07 costs 36,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,857 £.

As for electric range, the GWM ORA 07 offers substantially more range – reaching up to 520 km, about 454 km more than the Toyota C-HR.

C-HR

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the GWM ORA 07 offers substantially more power – delivering 408 HP compared to 223 HP. That’s roughly 185 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the GWM ORA 07 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.5 s, while the Toyota C-HR takes 7.4 s. That’s about 2.9 s quicker.

ORA 07

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Toyota C-HR is markedly lighter – 1,505 kg compared to 2,065 kg. The difference is around 560 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Toyota C-HR offers visibly more boot space – 447 L compared to 333 L. That’s a difference of about 114 L.

When it comes to payload, the Toyota C-HR carries somewhat more – 425 kg compared to 350 kg. That’s a difference of about 75 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The GWM ORA 07 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,000
ORA 07

GWM ORA 07

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 204 - 408 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.5 - 17.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 440 - 520 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Choosing between the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross comes down to whether you prefer the C-HR’s sharper styling and firmer, more engaging ride or the Yaris Cross’s roomier practicality and better efficiency. I’ll compare their driving feel, interior comfort, fuel economy, and features to …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Corolla
VS
Choosing between the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Corolla comes down to whether you want a compact crossover's higher driving position and distinctive styling or a traditional compact car's practicality and efficiency. The C-HR emphasizes bold looks and a more SUV-like feel, while the Corolla …
GWM ORA 07
Toyota C-HR

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

GWM ORA 07

The GWM ORA 07 arrives as a cheeky, fashion-forward electric crossover that blends retro-modern styling with practical everyday sense, so it’s as happy in city traffic as it is turning heads on the boulevard. Inside you get a comfy, tech-rich cabin and sensible packaging without a premium sticker, making it a smart pick for buyers who want personality and value in one neat package.

details
ORA 07
ORA 07 (1)

Reviews GWM ORA 07

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Toyota C-HR

The Toyota C-HR is a bold, coupe-styled crossover that grabs attention with angular lines and a modern interior design. It’s aimed at comfortable urban driving and sensible efficiency, offering practical features and distinctive looks rather than rugged off-road ability.

details
64380-c-hr-grey-2020-25-web-lr
64412-c-hr-grey-2020-41-web-lr
64421-c-hr-grey-2020-32-web-lr
64409-c-hr-grey-2020-37-web-lr
64403-c-hr-grey-2020-52-web-lr

Reviews Toyota C-HR

4.6 (12 Reviews)
rate
Owners generally report the Toyota C‑HR as an efficient, comfortable small crossover with a dependable feel and a modern, slightly futuristic design. Many praise its strong fuel economy, smooth ride—especially for rear passengers—good handling and reliability, while some point out the boot is a bit tight and overall practicality can feel limited for larger loads or more than two occupants. These impressions mostly come from city and commuter use, so long-distance or heavy-family needs might produce different priorities.
Marcin
7 Sept 2026, 18:03:01

I own a C‑HR 2 — great handling. Average fuel consumption as of today (8,300 km): 4 L. City driving and commutes to work outside the city on a national road — 15 km one way.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Jan
4 Sept 2026, 18:26:05

Nice car, very fuel-efficient! The 2.0 version is also quite quick.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Vicente
6 Aug 2026, 17:44:55

It's very comfortable and smooth. Rear space and the trunk are a bit tight, but for two people it's fine. Super economical, pleasant to drive and very comfortable.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Jan
16 May 2026, 20:51:01

Great driving comfort, admittedly short trips, but above all a cool impression.

Rav is for wimps.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Sam baba
25 Apr 2026, 21:54:02

Reliability and no maintenance costs, plus a futuristic design.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Lexus LBX
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Lexus LBX and Toyota C-HR are compact crossovers with similar footprints but aimed at different buyers. The LBX prioritizes premium materials, a quieter ride and upscale features, while the C-HR emphasizes bold styling, engaging handling and stronger value for money.
Lexus UX
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Lexus UX and Toyota C-HR are compact crossovers aimed at urban buyers who want agile packaging and distinctive style. The UX leans on Lexus-level refinement and a premium cabin, while the C-HR emphasizes bolder styling and strong value for money.
Ford Kuga
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Ford Kuga and the Toyota C‑HR are two popular compact crossovers that appeal to buyers who want a mix of practicality and economy but with different priorities. The Kuga emphasises family-friendly space, ride comfort and a broad choice of powertrains including plug‑in hybrid variants, whereas …
Nissan Qashqai
Toyota C-HR
VS
Choose the Nissan Qashqai if you want a sensible, roomy compact SUV that puts comfort, practicality and a grown-up cockpit ahead of flash; pick the Toyota C‑HR if you crave jaw‑dropping design, a taut chassis and the option of frugal hybrid running—at the cost of rear-seat space and a firmer ride. …
CUPRA Formentor
Toyota C-HR
VS
CUPRA Formentor and Toyota C‑HR are two compact crossovers that take very different approaches: the Formentor leans into sporty performance and bold style, while the C‑HR focuses on hybrid efficiency and everyday practicality. Below I’ll walk through the key differences to help you decide which …
Honda HR-V
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Honda HR‑V and Toyota C‑HR are two popular compact crossovers that take very different approaches: the HR‑V emphasizes space, comfort and everyday practicality, while the C‑HR prioritizes eye‑catching styling and a sportier driving feel. If you value flexible cargo space and a more conventional …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris
VS
Meet the Toyota C‑HR and the Toyota Yaris: one dresses like a crossover pop star with dramatic styling and a taller stance, while the other is the compact, sensible hatchback built for city life. Choose the C‑HR for presence, space and a firmer ride; pick the Yaris for nimble handling, lower …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Prius
VS
In this DriveDuel showdown we pit the sharp, coupe‑like Toyota C‑HR against the evergreen Toyota Prius to see whether style and urban swagger can outshine outright thriftiness. Choose the C‑HR for crossover looks, punchy handling and personality; pick the Prius for class‑leading fuel economy, …
GWM ORA 07
Toyota C-HR

Costs and Consumption
Price
36,000 - 45,800 £
Price
29,100 - 42,800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.5 - 17.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
440 - 520 km
Electric Range
66 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
52 - 116 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,210 kg
Curb weight
1,505 - 1,755 kg
Trunk capacity
333 L
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,862 mm
Width
1,832 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
350 kg
Payload
375 - 425 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plug-in Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 408 HP
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 8.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
340 - 680 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
150 - 300 kW
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,798 - 1,987 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
Brand
GWM
Brand
Toyota
What drivetrain options does the GWM ORA 07 have?

The GWM ORA 07 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.