VS

GWM WEY 03 vs Mazda CX-60 comparison

Compare performance (442 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (41,100 £ vs 43,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – GWM WEY 03 or Mazda CX-60?

GWM WEY 03 vs Mazda CX-60: Key differences

GWM WEY 03

  • barely cheaper
  • noticeably more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • clearly more electric range
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Mazda CX-60

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly lighter
  • marginally more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

WEY 03

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

GWM WEY 03 is barely cheaper – starting at 41,100 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,614 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the GWM WEY 03 uses 0.5 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.8 L/100km. The difference is about 3.3 L/100km.

As for electric range, the GWM WEY 03 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 139 km, about 76 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

CX-60

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the GWM WEY 03 offers noticeably more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 115 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the GWM WEY 03 is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.3 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.8 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the GWM WEY 03 delivers a bit more torque with 685 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 135 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is slightly lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 2,175 kg. The difference is around 285 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers marginally more boot space – 570 L compared to 517 L. That’s a difference of about 53 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries markedly more – 612 kg compared to 375 kg. That’s a difference of about 237 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The GWM WEY 03 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £41,100
WEY 03

GWM WEY 03

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 367 - 442 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.5 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 130 - 139 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …
GWM WEY 03
Mazda CX-60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

GWM WEY 03

The WEY 03 cuts a striking figure with sharp, futuristic styling and an interior that punches above its weight for premium feel and tech. For buyers after distinctive looks, a comfy cabin and confident handling without the same badge drama, it’s a compelling alternative that also adds a dash of personality to everyday driving.

details
serpimg_a26B5d

Reviews GWM WEY 03

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres

Reviews Mazda CX-60

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
Leo
7 Mar 2026, 11:15:10

👍

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
THEO
7 Mar 2026, 07:02:13

2026 model is the new standard, great car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
andy
15 Feb 2026, 18:05:07

A car with lots of problems — more trips to the garage than anything else.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

BMW X3
Mazda CX-60
VS
The BMW X3 and Mazda CX-60 occupy the premium mid-size SUV segment but take different routes—the X3 prioritizes dynamic performance and upscale refinement, while the CX-60 leans toward refined comfort, efficiency and strong value. This comparison will help you decide which suits your priorities: …
Hyundai Tucson
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and Mazda CX-60 emerge as standout options, each offering a unique blend of style and performance. While the Tucson boasts a spacious interior and advanced technology features, the CX-60 impresses with its premium materials and engaging …
Mazda CX-60
VW Tiguan
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and VW Tiguan compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mazda CX-60
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a near‑premium Japanese SUV — taut handling, classy materials and a driver-focused personality — while the VW Tayron is the steady, sensible German: roomy, practical and unabashedly conservative. If you crave engaging dynamics and a bit of style, the CX-60 will put a …
GWM WEY 03
GWM WEY 05
VS
Choosing between the GWM WEY 03 and WEY 05 comes down to whether you want a sportier, more dynamic compact SUV or a slightly larger, more comfort- and tech-focused model. I’ll compare styling, driving character, equipment and value so you can pick the one that best fits your priorities.
Mazda CX-60
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a compact luxury tourer — beautifully detailed cabin, taut chassis and an engaging powertrain (there’s even a slick PHEV option) that rewards drivers who care about style and dynamics. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family workhorse: cavernous interior, optional …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-60
VS
In this head-to-head comparison, the Ford Kuga impresses with its sporty handling and fuel-efficient hybrid options, making it a strong contender for those seeking versatility in urban settings. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its premium interior and advanced technology features, …
Kia Sorento
Mazda CX-60
VS
Kia Sorento and Mazda CX-60 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
GWM WEY 03
Mazda CX-60

Costs and Consumption
Price
41,100 - 47,900 £
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Consumption L/100km
0.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
130 - 139 km
Electric Range
63 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
15 g/km
co2
85 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,175 - 2,295 kg
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Trunk capacity
517 L
Trunk capacity
570 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
375 kg
Payload
581 - 612 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
367 - 442 HP
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 7.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
500 - 685 Nm
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
270 - 325 kW
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
Brand
GWM
Brand
Mazda
Is the GWM WEY 03 offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.