VS

Honda CR-V vs Mazda CX-6e comparison

Compare performance (184 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (42,800 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Honda CR-V or Mazda CX-6e?

Honda CR-V vs Mazda CX-6e: Key differences

Honda CR-V

4.9 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • markedly lighter
  • clearly more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-6e

  • noticeably more power
  • substantially more electric range
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CR-V

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Honda CR-V is only slightly cheaper – starting at 42,800 £ , while the Mazda CX-6e costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 77 £.

As for electric range, the Mazda CX-6e offers substantially more range – reaching up to 484 km, about 406 km more than the Honda CR-V.

CX-6e

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-6e offers noticeably more power – delivering 258 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 74 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-6e is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 7.9 s, while the Honda CR-V takes 9 s. That’s about 1.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Honda CR-V delivers slightly more torque with 335 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 45 Nm more.

CR-V

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Honda CR-V is markedly lighter – 1,821 kg compared to 2,205 kg. The difference is around 384 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Honda CR-V offers clearly more boot space – 617 L compared to 468 L. That’s a difference of about 149 L.

When it comes to payload, the Honda CR-V carries moderately more – 475 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 90 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-6e stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £42,800
CX-6e

Mazda CX-6e

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 258 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 18.9 - 19.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 468 - 484 km
details

Frequently compared as well

BYD Sealion 7
Mazda CX-6e
VS
In one corner is the tech‑packed BYD Sealion 7, a gadget-rich challenger promising range and features for the money; in the other is the Mazda CX‑6e, Mazda’s sleeker, driver-focused answer with a more premium feel. We’ll pit them on comfort, performance, tech and running costs so you know which one …
ZEEKR 7X
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Today we line up the ZEEKR 7X against the Mazda CX-6e — a clash of tech-forward electric ambition and Mazda’s quietly polished refinement. Expect roomy practicality, electric punch and a few surprising details that could decide which one earns a spot in your garage.
Honda CR-V
Mazda CX-6e

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Honda CR-V

The Honda CR-V blends sensible practicality with a polished feel, offering roomy interiors and a confident ride that keeps commutes and weekend escapes equally comfortable. Its unshowy styling and reliable reputation make it a smart, low‑drama choice for buyers who want versatility without fuss — the kind of car that quietly makes everyday life a little easier.

details
42223_CR-V_2015
42220_CR-V_2015
42219_CR-V_2015
42241_CR-V_2015

Reviews Honda CR-V

4.9 (4 Reviews)
rate
Marek
19 May 2026, 07:08:56

Very comfortable, lots of space, combined fuel consumption about 6 l, reliable, simple to operate, without unnecessary gadgets, very well made, easy to drive, a car for the city and long trips.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Yvi
18 Mar 2026, 18:55:49

Good car, very comfortable. It still drinks petrol — I do a lot of driving, so the hybrid system only makes itself felt in traffic jams....

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mazda CX-6e

The Mazda CX-6e blends Mazda’s flowing coupe‑SUV silhouette with electric propulsion to deliver a surprisingly engaging and polished driving experience that feels more premium than its price suggests. Inside, the cabin is quietly refined and ergonomically smart, with modern tech and practical space that make it a stylish, sensible choice for drivers who want EV manners without the fanfare.

details
serpimg_tXFAQx

Reviews Mazda CX-6e

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Tesla Model Y
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The Tesla Model Y and Mazda CX-6e represent two distinct takes on the modern electric SUV: Tesla focuses on range, software and charging convenience, while Mazda emphasizes refinement, build quality and a more traditional driving feel. This comparison will help you weigh the Model Y’s performance …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …
Kia EV5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Kia EV5 and Mazda CX-6e pits two fresh electric crossovers from established brands against each other, each promising a mix of range, tech and everyday practicality. This quick head-to-head will help you see which suits your driving needs and lifestyle better.
XPeng G6
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The XPeng G6 and Mazda CX-6e represent two different takes on the modern electric crossover — the G6 pushes a tech-forward, range-focused EV agenda while the CX-6e brings Mazda’s driver-focused dynamics to electrification. This comparison will cut through spec sheets to show how they differ in …
Toyota bZ4X
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Toyota bZ4X and Mazda CX-6e highlights two different takes on the electric crossover: Toyota’s practical, reliability-focused approach versus Mazda’s more premium, driver-oriented take. I’ll run through range and charging, interior and tech, driving dynamics, and running costs so you …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Honda CR-V
Honda ZR-V
VS
The Honda CR-V and Honda ZR-V are close relatives but aim at different buyers: the CR-V emphasizes roomy comfort and family-friendly practicality, while the ZR-V focuses on a more compact, engaging package for urban and active drivers. This comparison will run through size, driving character, fuel …
Toyota C-HR+
Mazda CX-6e
VS
This comparison pits the Toyota C-HR+ against the Mazda CX-6e to help you choose between Toyota’s sharp, design-led compact crossover and Mazda’s more driver-focused, likely electrified alternative. We’ll focus on real-world economy, interior comfort, driving dynamics and ownership costs so you can …
Honda CR-V
Mazda CX-6e

Costs and Consumption
Price
42,800 - 52,100 £
Price
42,800 - 45,400 £
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 6.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
18.9 - 19.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
78 km
Electric Range
468 - 484 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
59 - 152 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,821 - 1,988 kg
Curb weight
2,205 kg
Trunk capacity
579 - 617 L
Trunk capacity
468 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,866 mm
Width
1,935 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
439 - 475 kg
Payload
385 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
184 HP
Power HP
258 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 9.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
335 Nm
Torque
290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
135 kW
Power kW
190 kW
Engine capacity
1,993 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Honda
Brand
Mazda
Is the Honda CR-V offered with different drivetrains?

The Honda CR-V is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.