VS

Honda CR-V vs MG HS comparison

Compare performance (184 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (42,800 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Honda CR-V or MG HS?

Honda CR-V vs MG HS: Key differences

Honda CR-V

4.8 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit more trunk space

MG HS

4.6 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • visibly more electric range
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CR-V

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

MG HS is clearly cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Honda CR-V costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,780 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MG HS uses 0.5 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Honda CR-V with 2.6 L/100km. The difference is about 2.1 L/100km.

As for electric range, the MG HS offers visibly more range – reaching up to 100 km, about 22 km more than the Honda CR-V.

HS

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the MG HS offers markedly more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 88 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG HS is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Honda CR-V takes 9 s. That’s about 2.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the MG HS delivers very slightly more torque with 350 Nm compared to 335 Nm. That’s about 15 Nm more.

CR-V

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MG HS is marginally lighter – 1,735 kg compared to 1,821 kg. The difference is around 86 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Honda CR-V offers a bit more boot space – 617 L compared to 507 L. That’s a difference of about 110 L.

When it comes to payload, the Honda CR-V carries a bit more – 475 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 75 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG HS is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £30,000
HS

MG HS

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 224 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.5 - 5.5 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 100 km
details

Frequently compared as well

BYD Seal U
MG HS
VS
Fresh from BYD’s EV revolution, the sleek Seal U brings range, tech and bold styling to spar with the MG HS/EHS — MG’s faithful family crossover offered as a petrol and a plug‑in hybrid that plays the safe, sensible card. Which one gives you the best mix of space, running costs and grin‑per‑mile?
Kia Sportage
MG HS
VS
Two likeable compact crossovers go head-to-head: the well-rounded Kia Sportage versus the value-packed MG HS and its electrified twin, the EHS. Which wins on everyday practicality, kit and style — and which one is the clever buy for your driveway and wallet?
Honda CR-V
MG HS

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Honda CR-V

The Honda CR-V blends sensible practicality with a polished feel, offering roomy interiors and a confident ride that keeps commutes and weekend escapes equally comfortable. Its unshowy styling and reliable reputation make it a smart, low‑drama choice for buyers who want versatility without fuss — the kind of car that quietly makes everyday life a little easier.

details
42223_CR-V_2015
42220_CR-V_2015
42219_CR-V_2015
42241_CR-V_2015

Reviews Honda CR-V

4.8 (2 Reviews)
rate
Yvi
18 Mar 2026, 18:55:49

Good car, very comfortable. It still drinks petrol — I do a lot of driving, so the hybrid system only makes itself felt in traffic jams....

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

MG HS

The MG HS, also known as the EHS in its hybrid variant, is a midsize SUV that combines modern design with a focus on comfort and technology. Its spacious interior offers a premium feel, enhanced by quality materials and an array of advanced features aimed at ensuring a smooth driving experience. Known for its efficiency, the MG HS/EHS delivers an enjoyable ride whether navigating city streets or taking on longer road trips.

details
Left-Front-45
Front-Side
Right-Back-45
Side-large-interior-1

Reviews MG HS

4.6 (4 Reviews)
rate
Mac Finn
29 Oct 2025, 11:27:52

Good perfomance and superbly low fuel consumption in daily use.

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Tucson
MG HS
VS
Put the Hyundai Tucson up against the MG HS and its plug‑in EHS sibling and you get a tasty choice: Korean refinement and all‑round polish versus MG's bargain-packed, tech-forward alternatives. We'll sort practicality, driving feel, equipment and running costs so you can pick the SUV that actually …
Honda CR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Honda CR-V is the sensible all‑rounder — refined, reliable and especially tempting if you want a supple ride and frugal hybrid tech, while the Skoda Kodiaq is the bigger, more pragmatic family hauler with genuine seven‑seat practicality and a cavernous boot. Choose the CR‑V for urban ease and …
Honda CR-V
Volvo XC60
VS
In the battle of the crossovers, the Honda CR-V and the Volvo XC60 stand out with distinct personalities. The CR-V, known for its reliability and value, excels in practicality with a spacious interior and impressive fuel efficiency. On the other hand, the XC60's luxurious design and advanced safety …
Honda CR-V
Volvo XC40
VS
The Honda CR‑V is the sensible family SUV — cavernous boot, comfortable ride and rock‑solid reliability that keeps running costs down, while the Volvo XC40 tempts you with Scandi styling, cutting‑edge safety tech and a more premium, tactile cabin. Choose the CR‑V for everyday practicality and …
Omoda 5
MG HS
VS
Unsure whether the Omoda 5 or the MG HS is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Honda CR-V
Lexus NX
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Honda CR-V and Lexus NX stand out for their unique strengths. While the CR-V impresses with its spacious interior and fuel efficiency, the Lexus NX offers a more luxurious feel and advanced technology features. Ultimately, the choice between these …
Honda CR-V
Honda ZR-V
VS
Honda CR-V and Honda ZR-V go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Citroen C5 Aircross
MG HS
VS
The Citroen C5 Aircross and MG HS compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Honda CR-V
MG HS

Costs and Consumption
Price
42,800 - 52,100 £
Price
30,000 - 36,000 £
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 6.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
78 km
Electric Range
100 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
59 - 152 g/km
co2
14 - 126 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,821 - 1,988 kg
Curb weight
1,735 - 1,930 kg
Trunk capacity
579 - 617 L
Trunk capacity
507 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,866 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
439 - 475 kg
Payload
400 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
184 HP
Power HP
224 - 272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 9.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 7.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
335 Nm
Torque
340 - 350 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
135 kW
Power kW
165 - 200 kW
Engine capacity
1,993 cm3
Engine capacity
1,496 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B
Brand
Honda
Brand
MG
Is the Honda CR-V offered with different drivetrains?

The Honda CR-V is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.