VS

Honda CR-V vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan comparison

Compare performance (184 HP vs 600 HP), boot space and price (42,800 £ vs 275,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Honda CR-V or Rolls-Royce Cullinan?

Honda CR-V vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan: Key differences

Honda CR-V

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • substantially more efficient
  • considerably lighter
  • slightly more trunk space
details

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

  • considerably more power
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CR-V

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Honda CR-V is substantially cheaper – starting at 42,800 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan costs 275,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 232,629 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Honda CR-V uses 2.6 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Rolls-Royce Cullinan with 16 L/100km. The difference is about 13.4 L/100km.

Cullinan

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers considerably more power – delivering 600 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 416 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Honda CR-V takes 9 s. That’s about 4.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Rolls-Royce Cullinan delivers considerably more torque with 900 Nm compared to 335 Nm. That’s about 565 Nm more.

CR-V

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Honda CR-V is considerably lighter – 1,821 kg compared to 2,660 kg. The difference is around 839 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Honda CR-V offers slightly more boot space – 617 L compared to 555 L. That’s a difference of about 62 L.

When it comes to payload, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan carries significantly more – 840 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 365 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Honda CR-V holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £42,800
CR-V

Honda CR-V

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 184 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.6 - 6.7 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 78 km
Honda CR-V
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Honda CR-V

The Honda CR-V blends sensible practicality with a polished feel, offering roomy interiors and a confident ride that keeps commutes and weekend escapes equally comfortable. Its unshowy styling and reliable reputation make it a smart, low‑drama choice for buyers who want versatility without fuss — the kind of car that quietly makes everyday life a little easier.

details

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

The Cullinan seamlessly combines the hallmark luxury of Rolls-Royce with the rugged versatility of an SUV, making it a true standout in the automotive landscape. Its impeccably crafted interior envelops passengers in a serene atmosphere, complemented by advanced technology and unparalleled comfort. With its commanding presence on the road, the Cullinan redefines what it means to travel in style without compromising on capability.

details
Honda CR-V
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption

Price
42,800 - 52,100 £
Price
275,400 - 324,600 £
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 6.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
16 - 16.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
78 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
59 - 152 g/km
co2
363 - 380 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,821 - 1,988 kg
Curb weight
2,660 kg
Trunk capacity
579 - 617 L
Trunk capacity
555 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,866 mm
Width
2,000 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
439 - 475 kg
Payload
840 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
184 HP
Power HP
571 - 600 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 9.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
335 Nm
Torque
850 - 900 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
12
Power kW
135 kW
Power kW
420 - 441 kW
Engine capacity
1,993 cm3
Engine capacity
6,749 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Honda
Brand
Rolls-Royce
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.