Honda Jazz vs Honda CR-V comparison

Q: How much power does the Honda Jazz deliver on the road?

Depending on the version, the Honda Jazz delivers up to 122 HP.

Q: What is the fuel consumption of the Honda Jazz according to the manufacturer?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 4.5 L/100km.

Q: What is the Honda Jazz’s trunk volume?

Depending on configuration, up to 304 L fit inside.

Q: Is the Honda CR-V offered with different drivetrains?

The Honda CR-V is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

Q: How powerful is the Honda CR-V's engine?

The Honda CR-V reaches a peak output of 184 HP, depending on the model.

Q: What are the consumption figures for the Honda CR-V in liters per 100 km?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 2.6 L/100km.

Jazz

Honda Jazz VS Honda CR-V: which Honda fits your life?

The Honda Jazz and Honda CR‑V could not be more different in everyday terms: one is a compact, clever city car, the other a roomy, comfort‑focused SUV. The Jazz trades outright size for extraordinary interior flexibility and a city‑friendly footprint that makes tight streets and parking easy. The CR‑V answers with ample rear space, a big boot and a calm, long‑distance demeanor that suits families and regular motorway miles. Put simply: the Jazz simplifies urban life; the CR‑V expands it.

CR-V

Character and driving feel

The Jazz feels light on its feet, with an easy, forgiving steering and a suspension tuned for urban comfort rather than sporty responses; it rewards low‑stress daily driving more than enthusiastic cornering. By contrast, the CR‑V brings a planted, composed presence—its weight and suspension choices create a steady, relaxed ride on long runs though it never pretends to be a handling star. The Jazz’s drivetrain is happiest in town and under light load, while the CR‑V’s hybrid/petrol options deliver a steadier, more substantial pull when you’re loaded or cruising. If you favour nimbleness and predictability in traffic pick the Jazz; if you prioritise stability and composed highway miles pick the CR‑V.

Jazz

Comfort and perceived quality inside

The Jazz surprises for its class with excellent outward visibility, a high seating position that makes entry effortless and materials that feel robust at main touchpoints, but its compact cabin inevitably feels cozier. The CR‑V presents a more conventional SUV ambience: broader seats, more rear‑legroom and a generally more mature, solid cabin feel that reads as higher value on first impressions. Noise insulation and seat support tend to favour the CR‑V on long runs, whereas the Jazz feels lighter and airier around town. For buyers who spend most time in traffic or need easy access, the Jazz’s ergonomics win; for those who seek lounge‑like comfort on long journeys, the CR‑V is the better match.

CR-V

Practicality and everyday usability

Practicality is where the Jazz punches above its weight: its clever seat architecture and flat floor let you carry awkward loads in a much shorter car, and the low loading sill makes daily grocery, stroller or flat‑pack handling simple. The CR‑V answers with sheer capacity—a larger, well‑shaped boot and a sliding rear bench that help with child seats and adult passengers on longer trips, though there’s no third row to expand seating. The trade‑off is footprint: the Jazz fits more places and is easier to live with in tight urban environments, while the CR‑V handles weekend luggage, sports kit and family gear with less compromise. If your life revolves around city errands and flexible cargo, the Jazz is the clever choice; if you routinely haul large loads or people, the CR‑V does the heavy lifting better.

Jazz

City friendliness versus long‑distance behavior

In city use the Jazz is unmistakably friendlier: small turning circles, excellent sightlines and frugal urban running make it a low‑stress commuter car. The CR‑V is competent in town—its higher driving position helps visibility—but its size and turning radius make city parking and narrow streets more work. On longer trips the CR‑V’s composure, room and comfort features become obvious advantages, while the Jazz can start to feel strained under sustained high‑speed or heavy load conditions. Consider charging habits too: if you can plug in depending on the CR‑V variant, you’ll change the economics and daily experience significantly; the Jazz rewards stop‑start urban life without that dependency.

CR-V

Who each car suits best and how to decide next

Choose the Jazz if you prioritise compactness, maximum interior flexibility for odd loads, superb city economy and a relaxed, uncomplicated cabin for two adults and occasional passengers. Opt for the CR‑V if you need generous rear space, a big boot for family life or regular long journeys and prefer a calmer, more substantial highway experience even at a higher purchase cost. The decision is a classic trade‑off between footprint and capacity: small‑footprint brilliance versus roomy, composed utility. Read on to the technical comparison to see how those practical differences map to powertrains, cargo volumes and running costs so you can match numbers to the lived trade‑offs above.

Frequently compared as well

Honda Jazz

Toyota Yaris Cross

VS

Small and sensible, the Honda Jazz is a masterclass in clever packaging — airy rear seats, Magic Seat flexibility and effortless economy make it the practical everyman’s champion, even if it lacks SUV swagger. The Toyota Yaris Cross, by contrast, trades some of that interior generosity for a taller …

Honda HR-V

Honda Jazz

VS

Think of the HR-V as the SUVs' extrovert — taller stance, more boot space and a confident road presence — while the Jazz is the clever, city‑savvy hatch that hides a brilliant, flexible cabin and frugal running costs. Choose the HR-V if you need space and SUV style; pick the Jazz if you value …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Jazz

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Honda Jazz is substantially cheaper – starting at 23,100 £ , while the Honda CR-V costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 19,671 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Honda CR-V uses 2.6 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Honda Jazz with 4.5 L/100km. The difference is about 1.9 L/100km.

CR-V

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Honda CR-V offers markedly more power – delivering 184 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 62 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Honda CR-V is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 9 s, while the Honda Jazz takes 9.4 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Honda CR-V delivers markedly more torque with 335 Nm compared to 253 Nm. That’s about 82 Nm more.

Jazz

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Honda Jazz is clearly lighter – 1,302 kg compared to 1,821 kg. The difference is around 519 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Honda CR-V offers considerably more boot space – 617 L compared to 304 L. That’s a difference of about 313 L.

When it comes to payload, the Honda CR-V carries a bit more – 475 kg compared to 388 kg. That’s a difference of about 87 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Honda CR-V holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Reviews Honda Jazz

4.6 (4 Reviews)

Moi
4 Dec 2025, 01:18:08

The little-known Japanese: versatile and very roomy, in the tradition of the old MPVs sacrificed on the altar of stupid SUVs.
And when it comes to the competition, there’s no contest between a reliable Honda powertrain that really consumes what it promises — even less at times — and a pure all-show PSA unit that drinks far more fuel than advertised.

Adriano
23 Oct 2025, 16:52:57

Fast, dynamic, very versatile. Boot just adequate but interior space excellent, even for people taller than 1.90 m. Fairly quiet and quite frugal on fuel. Sturdy and very reliable. Downsides: brakes and suspension noisy during manoeuvres, engine effective but noisy under acceleration. If driven with a bit of care, it's not hard to reach 30 km/l in town.

Reviews Honda CR-V

4.8 (2 Reviews)

Yvi
18 Mar 2026, 18:55:49

Good car, very comfortable. It still drinks petrol — I do a lot of driving, so the hybrid system only makes itself felt in traffic jams....

Show detailed rating

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)

Efficiency / Consumption & Range

Comfort & Interior

Driving Fun / Performance

Technology & Infotainment

Safety

Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use

Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Honda Jazz

Toyota Yaris

VS

The Honda Jazz and Toyota Yaris are two of the most practical and efficient superminis on the market, but they prioritise different things — Jazz leans toward versatile space and comfort, while Yaris focuses more on refinement and hybrid efficiency. I’ll walk through how they compare in interior …

Honda CR-V

Honda ZR-V

VS

The Honda CR-V and Honda ZR-V are close relatives but aim at different buyers: the CR-V emphasizes roomy comfort and family-friendly practicality, while the ZR-V focuses on a more compact, engaging package for urban and active drivers. This comparison will run through size, driving character, fuel …

Honda CR-V

Lexus NX

VS

The Honda CR-V and Lexus NX are two of the most sensible compact crossovers on the market—one prized for roomy practicality and strong value, the other for luxury, refinement and a more premium driving experience. This comparison shows how the CR-V’s efficient, user-friendly package stacks up …

Honda Jazz

Suzuki Swift

VS

Choosing between the Honda Jazz and the Suzuki Swift comes down to whether you prioritise interior space and everyday practicality or a punchy, fun-to-drive hatchback with lower running costs. The Jazz is prized for its flexible cabin and comfortable urban manners, while the Swift offers sharper …

Honda Jazz

Kia Niro

VS

The Honda Jazz is a clever, practical small hatch with a hugely flexible interior and low running costs, while the Kia Niro is a larger compact crossover offering more cabin space, tech and hybrid/electric powertrain options. If you mostly do city driving and value versatility choose the Jazz; if …

Honda Jazz

Toyota Corolla

VS

Comparing the Honda Jazz and the Toyota Corolla comes down to whether you value the Jazz’s clever interior packaging and city-friendly agility or the Corolla’s established reliability and composed highway manners. I’ll walk you through the key differences in space, fuel economy, driving feel and …

Honda Jazz

Toyota Aygo

VS

The Honda Jazz and Toyota Aygo represent two different takes on city motoring: the Jazz delivers surprising space and flexible practicality, while the Aygo prioritises compact dimensions and low running costs. Choose the Jazz for versatile everyday usability and family-friendly packaging; pick the …

Ford Puma

Honda Jazz

VS

When it comes to dynamic crossover options, the Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and engaging driving experience, making it ideal for those who value style and agility on the road. On the other hand, the Honda Jazz excels in practicality and efficiency, offering a spacious interior and …

Costs and Consumption
Price 23,100 - 26,700 £	Price 42,800 - 52,100 £
Consumption L/100km 4.5 - 4.8 L/100km	Consumption L/100km 2.6 - 6.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range 78 km
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 102 - 108 g/km	co2 59 - 152 g/km
Fuel tank capacity -	Fuel tank capacity -

Dimensions and Body
Body Type Hatchback	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors -	Doors -
Curb weight 1,302 - 1,321 kg	Curb weight 1,821 - 1,988 kg
Trunk capacity 304 L	Trunk capacity 579 - 617 L
Length -	Length -
Width -	Width 1,866 mm
Height -	Height -
Max trunk capacity -	Max trunk capacity -
Payload 369 - 388 kg	Payload 439 - 475 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Full Hybrid	Engine Type Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail CVT	Transmission Detail CVT
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 122 HP	Power HP 184 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 9.4 - 9.7 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 9 - 9.5 s
Max Speed -	Max Speed -
Torque 253 Nm	Torque 335 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 90 kW	Power kW 135 kW
Engine capacity 1,498 cm3	Engine capacity 1,993 cm3

General
Model Year 2025	Model Year 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class C	CO2 Efficiency Class D, E, B
Brand Honda	Brand Honda

Honda Jazz vs Honda CR-V: Key differences

Honda Jazz

Honda CR-V

Honda Jazz VS Honda CR-V: which Honda fits your life?

Character and driving feel

Comfort and perceived quality inside

Practicality and everyday usability

City friendliness versus long‑distance behavior

Who each car suits best and how to decide next

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

Engine and Performance:

Space and Everyday Use:

Who wins the race in the data check?

Honda CR-V

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Honda Jazz

Honda CR-V

Costs and Consumption

Dimensions and Body

Engine and Performance

General