VS

Ford Puma vs Honda Jazz comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 23,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Honda Jazz?

Ford Puma vs Honda Jazz: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Honda Jazz

4.8 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • visibly more efficient
  • marginally lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Puma

A New Chapter in Urban Commuting: Ford Puma vs Honda Jazz

As the urban landscape continues to evolve, car manufacturers are becoming increasingly inventive in delivering vehicles that answer the demands of today's eco-conscious and tech-savvy drivers. In this comparison, we'll delve into two formidable contenders: the Ford Puma, a sporty SUV, and the Honda Jazz, a compact hatchback, both equipped with a host of technical innovations and strong design elements.

Jazz

Design and Dimensions: SUV vs Hatchback

The Ford Puma exudes a robust, SUV-like stance, measuring up to 4226mm in length and 1805mm in width, creating a commanding presence on the road. Its elevated ride height not only provides an advantageous driving perspective but also enhances its aesthetic appeal.

On the other hand, the Honda Jazz embodies versatility and compact convenience, stretching up to 4105mm. Despite its smaller stature, the Jazz's clever use of space ensures that it is perfectly suited for navigating tight city streets while still offering commendable interior space.

Puma

Engine Performance and Efficiency

Under the hood, the Ford Puma provides a diverse range of engines. The petrol MHEV with options ranging from 125 to 168 HP meets varying driver needs, complemented by the electric variant boasting a 160 HP output with an impressive electric range of up to 376 km. Its fuel consumption ranges between 5.4 to 6 L/100km, with CO2 emissions paralleling its efficiency class from A to E.

In comparison, the Honda Jazz operates with a full hybrid engine producing 122 HP, optimized for fuel consumption as low as 4.5 L/100km and CO2 emissions ranging from 102 to 108 g/km. Though less powerful, the Jazz's efficiency is its key strength, designed for both urban and suburban landscapes.

Jazz

Interior and Cargo Space

Both vehicles comfortably seat five passengers, but their cargo capacities highlight different priorities. The Ford Puma boasts a trunk space of up to 523 liters, catering to drivers with active lifestyles needing extra storage.

The Honda Jazz, while offering a more modest trunk capacity of 304 liters, is renowned for its innovative "Magic Seat" system. This feature allows varied spatial configurations to maximize the interior layout, underscoring its adaptability despite its smaller size.

Puma

Transmission and Driving Dynamics

Ford Puma offers both manual and automatic (dual-clutch) transmissions, catering to different driving preferences. Its front-wheel-drive system, paired with an advanced suspension setup, provides a dynamic and engaging driving experience.

The Honda Jazz, equipped with a continuously variable transmission (CVT), offers smooth and efficient power delivery, complementing its hybrid system's goal of maximizing fuel efficiency and minimizing emissions.

Jazz

Conclusion: The Right Fit for Your Urban Journey

The choice between the Ford Puma and Honda Jazz boils down to personal preference and lifestyle needs. If you favor a commanding driving position with versatile powertrains and substantial cargo space, the Ford Puma makes a compelling case with its SUV design and range of engines.

However, if maximizing interior efficiency and fuel economy in a compact package is your priority, the Honda Jazz, with its full hybrid technology and ingenious interior flexibility, is hard to overlook. Both cars, with their distinct attributes, represent the strides made by automotive engineering to cater to environmentally-conscious urban commuters.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Honda Jazz is only slightly cheaper – starting at 23,100 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 814 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Honda Jazz uses 4.5 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.9 L/100km.

Jazz

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers clearly more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 46 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Honda Jazz takes 9.4 s. That’s about 2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers moderately more torque with 290 Nm compared to 253 Nm. That’s about 37 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Honda Jazz is marginally lighter – 1,302 kg compared to 1,316 kg. The difference is around 14 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries slightly more – 469 kg compared to 388 kg. That’s a difference of about 81 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 404 - 417 km
Ford Puma
Honda Jazz

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details

Honda Jazz

The Honda Jazz is a supremely practical small hatch that hides clever packaging and more usable space than it lets on, with friendly styling and an unfussy charm. It’s economical to run, easy to park and perfect for buyers who want reliable, versatile daily motoring without the hassle.

details
Ford Puma
Honda Jazz

Costs and Consumption

Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
23,100 - 26,700 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 4.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
102 - 108 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,302 - 1,321 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
304 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
-
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
369 - 388 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
122 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.4 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
253 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
90 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Ford
Brand
Honda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.