VS

Ford Puma vs Honda Jazz - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (168 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 23100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Honda Jazz?

Ford Puma

2 (7 Reviews)
rate

Honda Jazz

4.8 (3 Reviews)
rate

You can find all user reviews further down on this page.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Honda Jazz has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23100 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1671 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Honda Jazz manages with 4.50 L and is therefore distinct more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.90 L per 100 km.

Jazz

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a distinct edge – offering 168 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 46 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Honda Jazz takes 9.40 s. That’s about 2 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls slightly stronger with 290 Nm compared to 253 Nm. That’s about 37 Nm difference.

Ad · Affiliate
Car accessories
Car accessories
Popular best-sellers for everyday use & care
View on Amazon →
Boot organiser
Boot organiser
Storage boxes, nets & anti-slip solutions
Open best-sellers →
Car dash cams
Car dash cams
Safety, parking mode & 4K recording
See top models →
Car phone holders
Car phone holders
MagSafe, vent mounts & dashboard mounts
Browse popular mounts →
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Honda Jazz is hardly perceptible lighter – 1302 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 14 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers significantly more room – 523 L compared to 304 L. That’s a difference of about 219 L.

When it comes to payload, Ford Puma to a small extent takes the win – 469 kg compared to 388 kg. That’s a difference of about 81 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Ford Puma
Honda Jazz

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £24,800
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13.1 - 13.9 kWh
  • Electric Range : 361 - 376 km
details

Ford Puma

2 (7 Reviews)
rate

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Honda Jazz

4.8 (3 Reviews)
rate

The Honda Jazz is a supremely practical small hatch that hides clever packaging and more usable space than it lets on, with friendly styling and an unfussy charm. It’s economical to run, easy to park and perfect for buyers who want reliable, versatile daily motoring without the hassle.

details
298237_2020_Honda_Jazz
302626_2020_Honda_Jazz_e_HEV_Jazz_Crosstar_e_HEV
302605_2020_Honda_Jazz_e_HEV_Jazz_Crosstar_e_HEV
302610_2020_Honda_Jazz_e_HEV_Jazz_Crosstar_e_HEV
302609_2020_Honda_Jazz_e_HEV_Jazz_Crosstar_e_HEV

Reviews Ford Puma

2 (7 Reviews)
rate
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Reviews Honda Jazz

4.8 (3 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

Honda Jazz
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Small and sensible, the Honda Jazz is a masterclass in clever packaging — airy rear seats, Magic Seat flexibility and effortless economy make it the practical everyman’s champion, even if it lacks SUV swagger. The Toyota Yaris Cross, by contrast, trades some of that interior generosity for a taller …
Ford Focus
Ford Puma
VS
The Ford Focus stays the sensible, sharply handling hatchback — roomier and more practical for long miles and family duty — while the Ford Puma trades rear-seat space for a taller stance, cheeky crossover looks and a clever MegaBox for weekend kit. Choose the Focus if you want involvement and …
Ford Puma
Honda Jazz

Costs and Consumption
Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
23100 - 26700 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 4.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
102 - 108 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
1302 - 1321 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
304 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
-
Width
1805 mm
Width
-
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
369 - 388 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
122 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.4 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
253 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
90 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Ford
Brand
Honda

Similar Comparisons

Honda HR-V
Honda Jazz
VS
Think of the HR-V as the SUVs' extrovert — taller stance, more boot space and a confident road presence — while the Jazz is the clever, city‑savvy hatch that hides a brilliant, flexible cabin and frugal running costs. Choose the HR-V if you need space and SUV style; pick the Jazz if you value …
Honda Jazz
Lexus LBX
VS
The Honda Jazz remains the clever, no-nonsense supermini — insanely practical with Honda’s Magic Seat flexibility, frugal hybrid economy and city-friendly manners that make it the sensible choice for families on a budget. The Lexus LBX dresses the same small-car bones in luxury trim — sharper …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 …
Ford Puma
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the competitive arena of compact SUVs, the Ford Puma and Nissan Qashqai offer distinct advantages. The Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and lively handling, making it an exciting choice for city driving. Meanwhile, the Nissan Qashqai provides a versatile and spacious ride, equipped …
Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
Ford Puma
Opel Mokka
VS
In the competitive segment of subcompact SUVs, the Ford Puma and Opel Mokka stand out with their distinctive styles and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty design and flexible interior, offering practicality without compromising on aesthetics, while the Mokka captivates …
Honda Jazz
Suzuki Swift
VS
In the competitive subcompact segment, the Honda Jazz and Suzuki Swift stand out for their unique blend of style and practicality. The Jazz boasts a versatile interior with its innovative Magic Seats, allowing for exceptional cargo flexibility, while the Swift captivates with its sporty design and …
Honda Jazz
SEAT Arona
VS
The Honda Jazz and SEAT Arona compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.