VS

Ford Puma vs Honda Jazz comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 22,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Honda Jazz?

Ford Puma vs Honda Jazz: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • significantly more trunk space
details

Honda Jazz

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • visibly more efficient
  • marginally lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Achim Sedelmaier
Puma

Ford Puma VS Honda Jazz — quick take for buyers

Ford Puma VS Honda Jazz sets up a familiar trade-off: the Puma aims to make daily driving feel lively and clever, while the Jazz prizes space, visibility and fuss-free utility. The Puma projects a sportier character with a modern, screen-heavy cabin and a genuinely clever boot solution that suits active owners. The Jazz answers with a mini‑MPV mentality — tall doors, excellent sightlines and the flexible Magic Seats that transform how you load people and gear. Both are compact and city-friendly, but they reach that practicality in very different ways that shape who will enjoy them day to day. Read on for the contrasts that matter when you park them in your driveway.

Jazz

How they feel on the road

The Ford Puma steers and rides with intent: it feels agile, eager to change direction and rewards someone who enjoys a bit of engagement on twisty roads. The Honda Jazz is more laid-back, prioritising a composed, predictable ride that favours comfort and confidence over corner-carving thrills. Puma buyers will notice sharper responses and a firmer setup that communicates the road, while Jazz buyers get a calmer, more forgiving attitude that soothes the commute. Both cars mask their compromises differently — Puma by putting handling front and centre, Jazz by making everyday driving effortless.

Puma

Cabin comfort and perceived quality

Step into the Ford Puma and you sense a modern cockpit: big screens and a firmer, supportive seating position up front that many will find engaging but a touch clinical. The Honda Jazz feels more classic and homely inside, with higher seating, easier entry and physical climate controls that are simple to use without looking down. Puma’s rear space is the tighter of the two, so back‑seat passengers will prefer Jazz for longer trips or taller occupants. Material choices in the Jazz often read as more consistently robust, while the Puma relies on design and tech to sell a fresher atmosphere.

Jazz

Practicality and everyday usability

When it comes to luggage and loading, the Ford Puma surprises: a wide opening, clever underfloor options and washable storage make it ideal for muddy kit or awkward loads. The Honda Jazz counters with its Magic Seats and flat‑floor versatility, which convert the cabin into a mobile cargo bay for tall or bulky items in ways the Puma can’t match. In city use the Jazz’s superb visibility and narrow A‑pillars make parking and tight manoeuvres less stressful than the Puma, which can feel a little blind towards the rear despite parking aids. Both work well for families, but Puma favours weekend kit and sporty owners while Jazz favours flexible passenger and cargo combinations.

Puma

Long-distance behaviour and running life

On the motorway the Ford Puma generally feels planted and composed, with a drivetrain that can deliver brisk overtakes and a cabin that stays relatively quiet once cruising — though its character is more spirited than sedate. The Honda Jazz shines in urban and mixed driving for efficiency and calmness, but sustained high‑speed runs expose its engine noise and can raise consumption compared with more highway‑oriented rivals. Choose the Puma if you want a sharper, more driver‑focused long‑distance companion; pick the Jazz if most miles are city or suburban and you prize long‑term economy and low stress. Either way, each car makes compromises that become clearer the moment your journey leaves the neighbourhood.

Jazz

Who should buy which car — the buyer fit

If you value engagement, clever boot solutions and a tech-forward cabin, the Ford Puma is tuned to please drivers who want a compact SUV that’s lively to drive and practical for active lives. If you prioritise rear passenger comfort, maximum flexibility, ease of use in town and consistently low running costs in city use, the Honda Jazz is the more sensible, family‑friendly pick. The trade-offs are clear: choose Puma for personality and cargo cleverness, choose Jazz for space, visibility and everyday usability. These real-world differences set up the technical comparison that follows, so you can match driving priorities to the engineering choices behind them.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Kia EV2
VS
The Ford Puma and Kia EV2 represent two different approaches in the compact crossover class: the Puma delivers engaging handling, practical packaging and petrol/hybrid options, while the EV2 is a clean-sheet electric aimed at low running costs, range and modern tech. Choose the Puma if driving …
Honda HR-V
Honda Jazz
VS
Think of the HR-V as the SUVs' extrovert — taller stance, more boot space and a confident road presence — while the Jazz is the clever, city‑savvy hatch that hides a brilliant, flexible cabin and frugal running costs. Choose the HR-V if you need space and SUV style; pick the Jazz if you value …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Honda Jazz is only slightly cheaper – starting at 22,200 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,714 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Honda Jazz uses 4.5 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.9 L/100km.

Jazz

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers clearly more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 46 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Honda Jazz takes 9.4 s. That’s about 2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers moderately more torque with 290 Nm compared to 253 Nm. That’s about 37 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Honda Jazz is marginally lighter – 1,302 kg compared to 1,316 kg. The difference is around 14 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers significantly more boot space – 523 L compared to 304 L. That’s a difference of about 219 L.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries slightly more – 469 kg compared to 388 kg. That’s a difference of about 81 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission Manual, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 404 - 417 km
details
Ford Puma
Honda Jazz

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Honda Jazz

The Honda Jazz is a supremely practical small hatch that hides clever packaging and more usable space than it lets on, with friendly styling and an unfussy charm. It’s economical to run, easy to park and perfect for buyers who want reliable, versatile daily motoring without the hassle.

details
298237_2020_Honda_Jazz
302626_2020_Honda_Jazz_e_HEV_Jazz_Crosstar_e_HEV
302605_2020_Honda_Jazz_e_HEV_Jazz_Crosstar_e_HEV
302610_2020_Honda_Jazz_e_HEV_Jazz_Crosstar_e_HEV
302609_2020_Honda_Jazz_e_HEV_Jazz_Crosstar_e_HEV

Reviews Honda Jazz

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
Overall, owners tend to describe the Honda Jazz as a versatile, practical and reliable small car with excellent interior space for its size and strong fuel economy. Many praise its habitability even for tall passengers, its smooth hybrid character and city-friendly compact dimensions, while some owners mention the boot can feel just adequate and report occasional noise from brakes and suspension in low‑speed maneuvers and a louder engine under hard acceleration. These comments are concise but broadly consistent, outlining clear strengths and a few recurring annoyances to bear in mind.
Janusz
27 Aug 2026, 20:33:39

It seems to me that the Jazz hybrid works with more refinement than the Yaris hybrid.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dirk
5 Jul 2026, 21:11:02

The Honda and Kia are both fine, but in the old city where we live the shorter length makes a difference when finding a parking space. Also, the Honda's technology without a CVT is more advanced. The Honda is cheaper in road tax.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Stéphane
5 Jun 2026, 20:30:17

The Honda has been facelifted just like the Toyota; in terms of powertrains the 1.5 VTEC four-cylinder in the Honda is flawless, versus a more recent 1.5 three-cylinder in the Toyota that looks promising, but in terms of dealerships there are more for Toyota...

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Moi
4 Dec 2025, 01:18:08

The little-known Japanese: versatile and very roomy, in the tradition of the old MPVs sacrificed on the altar of stupid SUVs.
And when it comes to the competition, there’s no contest between a reliable Honda powertrain that really consumes what it promises — even less at times — and a pure all-show PSA unit that drinks far more fuel than advertised.

Adriano
23 Oct 2025, 16:52:57

Fast, dynamic, very versatile. Boot just adequate but interior space excellent, even for people taller than 1.90 m. Fairly quiet and quite frugal on fuel. Sturdy and very reliable. Downsides: brakes and suspension noisy during manoeuvres, engine effective but noisy under acceleration. If driven with a bit of care, it's not hard to reach 30 km/l in town.

Frequently compared as well

Honda Jazz
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Choosing between the Honda Jazz and the Toyota Yaris Cross means weighing the Jazz’s clever, spacious hatch packaging against the higher-riding, crossover practicality of the Yaris Cross. This comparison cuts through marketing to focus on real-world space, fuel economy, driving feel and everyday …
Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
Honda Jazz
Lexus LBX
VS
The Honda Jazz remains the clever, no-nonsense supermini — insanely practical with Honda’s Magic Seat flexibility, frugal hybrid economy and city-friendly manners that make it the sensible choice for families on a budget. The Lexus LBX dresses the same small-car bones in luxury trim — sharper …
Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
Ford Puma
Skoda Epiq
VS
Ford Puma vs Skoda Epiq is a matchup between a compact, city-oriented crossover and a more conventional Skoda SUV offering (marketed here as the Epiq). This comparison focuses on what matters to real buyers: space, practicality, driving feel, running costs and which car suits which type of …
Ford Puma
Kia XCeed
VS
The Ford Puma and Kia XCeed are two of the sharper compact crossovers on the market, each mixing car-like driving manners with useful everyday practicality. This comparison looks at driving dynamics, interior quality, space and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your lifestyle.
Honda Jazz
Toyota Corolla
VS
Comparing the Honda Jazz and the Toyota Corolla comes down to whether you value the Jazz’s clever interior packaging and city-friendly agility or the Corolla’s established reliability and composed highway manners. I’ll walk you through the key differences in space, fuel economy, driving feel and …
Honda Jazz
Toyota Yaris
VS
The Honda Jazz and Toyota Yaris are two of the most practical and efficient superminis on the market, but they prioritise different things — Jazz leans toward versatile space and comfort, while Yaris focuses more on refinement and hybrid efficiency. I’ll walk through how they compare in interior …
Ford Puma
Honda Jazz

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
22,200 - 25,900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 4.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
102 - 108 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,302 - 1,321 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
304 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,694 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
369 - 388 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
122 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.4 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
253 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
90 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Ford
Brand
Honda
What drivetrain options does the Ford Puma have?

The Ford Puma is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.