Compare performance (184 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (42,800 £ vs 32,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Honda CR-V or Skoda Elroq?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The automotive world is abuzz with two remarkable contenders in the SUV market: the Honda CR-V and the Skoda Elroq. Both models are shaping the future of SUVs with distinct approaches to power, efficiency, and innovation. Let’s delve into a detailed comparison between these two formidable opponents, exploring their strengths and differences.
The Honda CR-V continues its legacy with a dual-engine strategy, offering both full hybrid and plug-in hybrid versions. This SUV churns out 184 HP from its 4-cylinder engine, reaching a top speed ranging from 187 to 195 km/h, depending on the drivetrain. Boasting an all-wheel-drive and front-wheel-drive options, the CR-V provides flexibility and performance in varied driving conditions. It accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h between 9 and 9.5 seconds.
In contrast, the Skoda Elroq embraces the future with its all-electric powertrain. With power options up to 286 HP, the Elroq is capable of reaching a maximum speed of 180 km/h. The rear-wheel-drive SUV accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in as quick as 6.6 seconds. Emitting zero CO2, it exemplifies environmental consciousness.
Fuel efficiency remains a key highlight for the Honda CR-V, with consumption rates ranging from 0.8 L/100km in its most efficient plug-in variant to 6.7 L/100km in hybrid mode. The electric range of up to 79 km allows for economical short drives.
Meanwhile, the Skoda Elroq offers impressive electric ranges, varying from 375 to an astounding 580 km on a single charge, with consumption between 15.2 and 16.4 kWh/100km. Its battery capacities range from 52 kWh to 77 kWh, ensuring extensive travel between charges.
Both SUVs cater to practicality with spacious designs. The Honda CR-V measures 4706 mm in length, offering a trunk capacity between 579 and 617 liters which is perfect for families and adventures. With a curb weight ranging from 1821 to 1988 kg, it manages to provide a robust yet comfortable drive.
The Skoda Elroq, slightly shorter at 4488 mm, presents a trunk space of 470 liters. However, with a commendable payload capacity of up to 531 kg and a curb weight between 1949 and 2119 kg, it offers significant utility without compromising on comfort.
The Honda CR-V boasts advanced hybrid technology, integrating seamlessly the benefits of electric drivetrains with traditional internal combustion engines. Its Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) ensures smooth and efficient power delivery, catering to drivers who prioritize economy with flexibility.
On the other hand, Skoda Elroq leads with its full-electric approach, featuring an advanced reduction gearbox and innovative design that promotes not just sustainability but a futuristic driving experience. Its commitment to zero emissions is supported by a top-notch electric drive system, indicative of broader environmental trends in the automotive sector.
In conclusion, the Honda CR-V and Skoda Elroq each bring unique offerings to the SUV landscape. The CR-V shines with its hybrid versatility and dependable design, appealing to those who value a balance between traditional power and hybrid efficiency. Meanwhile, the Elroq captures the spirit of innovation and sustainability with its impressive electric range and emission-free promise, targeting eco-conscious consumers.
As these models propel into the future, the choice between the Honda CR-V and Skoda Elroq depends on individual preferences, whether it’s the hybrid flexibility or electric revolution. Both models are a testament to the evolving nature of SUVs, setting benchmarks for future automotive design.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Skoda Elroq is visibly cheaper – starting at 32,000 £ , while the Honda CR-V costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,723 £.
As for electric range, the Skoda Elroq offers substantially more range – reaching up to 574 km, about 496 km more than the Honda CR-V.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Elroq offers substantially more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 156 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Elroq is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Honda CR-V takes 9 s. That’s about 3.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Elroq delivers clearly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 335 Nm. That’s about 344 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Honda CR-V is a bit lighter – 1,821 kg compared to 2,036 kg. The difference is around 215 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Honda CR-V offers clearly more boot space – 617 L compared to 470 L. That’s a difference of about 147 L.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Elroq carries somewhat more – 549 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 74 kg.
The Skoda Elroq is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Honda CR-V blends sensible practicality with a polished feel, offering roomy interiors and a confident ride that keeps commutes and weekend escapes equally comfortable. Its unshowy styling and reliable reputation make it a smart, low‑drama choice for buyers who want versatility without fuss — the kind of car that quietly makes everyday life a little easier.
details
The Skoda Elroq is a practical and well-rounded compact SUV that blends clever packaging with a calm, comfortable ride. It offers a sensible interior, straightforward technology and a value-focused approach, making it a particularly good choice for families and everyday drivers.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
42,800 - 52,100 £
|
Price
32,000 - 47,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 6.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 16.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
78 km
|
Electric Range
441 - 574 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
59 - 152 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,821 - 1,988 kg
|
Curb weight
2,036 - 2,255 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
579 - 617 L
|
Trunk capacity
470 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,866 mm
|
Width
1,884 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
439 - 475 kg
|
Payload
482 - 549 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 HP
|
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 9.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
335 Nm
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
135 kW
|
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,993 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Honda
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España