Is the Honda Jazz offered with different drivetrains?

The Honda Jazz is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Honda Jazz?

Up to 122 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

How much fuel does the Honda Jazz use?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 4.50 L.

What is the top speed of the Honda Jazz?

Depending on the model, top speed is 175 km/h.

How big is the Honda Jazz overall?

The Honda Jazz measures 4089 mm long, wide and 1526 mm high.

Is the Kia XCeed offered with different drivetrains?

The Kia XCeed is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Kia XCeed?

Up to 180 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What are the consumption figures for the Kia XCeed in liters per 100 km?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 6.40 L.

What are the Kia XCeed’s length, width and height?

Length 4395 mm, width 1826 mm, height 1483 mm – those are the dimensions of the Kia XCeed.

Honda Jazz vs Kia XCeed – Which car gives you more for your money? Specs, differences & prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Jazz @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Honda Jazz has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23100 £, while the Kia XCeed costs 23100 £. That’s a price difference of around 34 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Honda Jazz manages with 4.50 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Kia XCeed with 6.40 L. The difference is about 1.90 L per 100 km.

XCeed @ Kia Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Kia XCeed has a evident edge – offering 180 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 58 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Kia XCeed is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.50 s, while the Honda Jazz takes 9.40 s. That’s about 0.90 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Kia XCeed performs somewhat better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Honda Jazz tops out at 175 km/h. The difference is around 35 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Kia XCeed pulls slight stronger with 265 Nm compared to 253 Nm. That’s about 12 Nm difference.

Jazz @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Honda Jazz is slight lighter – 1302 kg compared to 1351 kg. The difference is around 49 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Kia XCeed offers clearly perceptible more room – 426 L compared to 304 L. That’s a difference of about 122 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Kia XCeed performs slightly better – up to 1378 L, which is about 173 L more than the Honda Jazz.

When it comes to payload, Kia XCeed somewhat takes the win – 479 kg compared to 388 kg. That’s a difference of about 91 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Kia XCeed shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Reviews Honda Jazz

5 (2 Reviews)

Reviews Kia XCeed

4.8 (2 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.

Honda Jazz

@ Toyota Motor Corporation

Toyota Yaris Cross

VS

Small and sensible, the Honda Jazz is a masterclass in clever packaging — airy rear seats, Magic Seat flexibility and effortless economy make it the practical everyman’s champion, even if it lacks SUV swagger. The Toyota Yaris Cross, by contrast, trades some of that interior generosity for a taller …

If you want a sharper, more practical hatchback that still feels engaging behind the wheel, the Kia Ceed is the sensible, better-value pick with crisper handling and lower running costs. But if you crave a bit of SUV swagger, higher ride height and extra street presence for town runs and weekend …

Costs and Consumption
Price 23100 - 26700 £	Price 23100 - 33000 £
Consumption L/100km 4.5 - 4.8 L	Consumption L/100km 6.4 - 6.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 102 - 108 g/km	co2 144 - 155 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 40 L	Fuel tank capacity 50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type Hatchback	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1302 - 1320 kg	Curb weight 1351 - 1419 kg
Trunk capacity 304 L	Trunk capacity 426 L
Length 4089 - 4105 mm	Length 4395 mm
Width -	Width 1826 mm
Height 1526 - 1556 mm	Height 1483 - 1495 mm
Max trunk capacity 1205 L	Max trunk capacity 1378 L
Payload 370 - 388 kg	Payload 471 - 479 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Full Hybrid	Engine Type Petrol
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail CVT	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 122 HP	Power HP 115 - 180 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 9.4 - 9.7 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.5 - 11.7 s
Max Speed 175 km/h	Max Speed 182 - 210 km/h
Torque 253 Nm	Torque 200 - 265 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Power kW 90 kW	Power kW 85 - 132 kW
Engine capacity 1498 cm3	Engine capacity 998 - 1598 cm3