@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
@ Volvo Cars
VS

Honda ZR-V vs Volvo XC60 – Differences & prices compared

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Honda ZR-V or Volvo XC60?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ZR-V @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Honda ZR-V has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £, while the Volvo XC60 costs 49200 £. That’s a price difference of around 12420 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Volvo XC60 manages with 2.80 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Honda ZR-V with 5.70 L. The difference is about 2.90 L per 100 km.

XC60 @ Volvo Cars

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 has a significantly edge – offering 455 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 271 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Honda ZR-V takes 7.80 s. That’s about 2.90 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Volvo XC60 performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Honda ZR-V tops out at 173 km/h. The difference is around 7 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC60 pulls significantly stronger with 709 Nm compared to 315 Nm. That’s about 394 Nm difference.

ZR-V @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Honda ZR-V is slightly lighter – 1660 kg compared to 1900 kg. The difference is around 240 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Volvo XC60 offers clearly perceptible more room – 483 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 103 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC60 performs slightly better – up to 1543 L, which is about 231 L more than the Honda ZR-V.

When it comes to payload, Volvo XC60 a bit takes the win – 550 kg compared to 455 kg. That’s a difference of about 95 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Volvo XC60 shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £49,200
XC60 @ Volvo Cars

Volvo XC60

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 250 - 455 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.8 - 7.5 L
  • Electric Range : 74 - 82 km
details

Honda ZR-V

5 (1)
rate

The Honda ZR-V blends smart practicality with sharper styling than you might expect, giving buyers a calm, competent companion for daily life. Inside it's comfortable and cleverly laid out, easy to live with and never trying too hard to be exciting.

details
440009_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
440010_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
440007_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
440004_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
440008_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
439994_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
439993_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
439991_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
439989_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
439988_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
439986_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
439984_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
439981_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
439980_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
439978_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
439979_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
439971_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.

Volvo XC60

5 (1)
rate

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.

details
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey @ Volvo Cars
288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey @ Volvo Cars
288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey @ Volvo Cars
294983_XC60_Recharge_interior @ Volvo Cars
288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior @ Volvo Cars

Top Car Comparisons

@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tayron
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Volvo XC60 stands out with its elegant Scandinavian design and a strong emphasis on safety features, making it a top choice for families and safety-conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the VW Tayron impresses with its spacious interior and advanced technology, appealing …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
VS
In the highly competitive midsize SUV segment, the Ford Kuga and Volvo XC60 stand out for their distinctive approaches to style and performance. While the Kuga excels with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, the XC60 offers a luxurious cabin and a refined driving experience. …
Honda ZR-V
Volvo XC60
ZR-V @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
XC60 @ Volvo Cars

Costs and Consumption
Price
36800 - 40400 £
Price
49200 - 75100 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 5.8 L
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
co2
130 - 132 g/km
co2
64 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
57 L
Fuel tank capacity
71 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1660 - 1710 kg
Curb weight
1900 - 2150 kg
Trunk capacity
370 - 380 L
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
Length
4568 mm
Length
4708 mm
Width
1840 mm
Width
1902 mm
Height
1613 mm
Height
1651 - 1655 mm
Max trunk capacity
1291 - 1312 L
Max trunk capacity
1528 - 1543 L
Payload
440 - 455 kg
Payload
510 - 550 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
-
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
-
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
184 HP
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
Max Speed
173 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
315 Nm
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
135 kW
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
Engine capacity
1993 cm3
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
Brand
Honda
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Honda ZR-V
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
The Honda ZR‑V brings sharper handling and a more premium-feeling cabin, while the Toyota Corolla Cross trades a bit of sparkle for everyday practicality, fuel-sipping reliability and stronger resale prospects. If you want a compact SUV that’s slightly more fun to drive and feels a touch upmarket, …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo V60
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
VS
In the ongoing battle of luxury and practicality, the Volvo V60 and Volvo XC60 stand as captivating contenders. The V60, a sleek station wagon, offers a refined driving experience with impressive fuel efficiency and an interior designed for comfort. In contrast, the XC60, a compact SUV, boasts a …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
Lynk & Co 08
VS
In the head-to-head comparison of the Volvo XC60 and Lynk & Co 08, both vehicles bring unique strengths to the table. The Volvo XC60 stands out with its time-tested reputation for safety and luxury, offering a refined driving experience and robust build quality. On the other hand, the Lynk & Co 08, …
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota RAV4
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Toyota RAV4 and Volvo XC60 each bring their unique strengths to the table. The RAV4 excels with its reliability and spacious interior, making it an excellent choice for families who prioritize practicality. In contrast, the XC60 offers a luxurious …
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Honda ZR-V
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Tucson
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Honda ZR-V and Hyundai Tucson offer enticing options for buyers. The Honda ZR-V shines with its sporty performance and agile handling, making it a joy to drive through urban environments. Meanwhile, the Hyundai Tucson impresses with its roomy interior and advanced …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tiguan
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Volvo XC60 and VW Tiguan stand out with their unique offerings. The XC60 boasts cutting-edge safety features and a luxurious interior, making it a favorite for those prioritizing comfort and security. Meanwhile, the Tiguan impresses with its spaciousness …
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
BYD Seal U
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the BYD Seal U and the Volvo XC60, both vehicles showcase impressive features tailored to different driving preferences. The BYD Seal U offers an attractive blend of cutting-edge electric technology and spacious interior, making it ideal for eco-conscious …
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Tucson
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and Volvo XC60 stand out for their distinct approaches to comfort and technology. The Tucson impresses with its spacious interior and user-friendly tech features, making it a great family vehicle. Meanwhile, the XC60 offers a more luxurious …
What drivetrain options does the Honda ZR-V have?

The Honda ZR-V is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.