VS

Hyundai Bayon vs Renault Arkana comparison

Compare performance (90 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (20,500 £ vs 28,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Hyundai Bayon or Renault Arkana?

Hyundai Bayon vs Renault Arkana: Key differences

Hyundai Bayon

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • noticeably lighter
details

Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • visibly more efficient
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Bayon

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Hyundai Bayon is visibly cheaper – starting at 20,500 £ , while the Renault Arkana costs 28,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,972 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Arkana uses 4.7 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Hyundai Bayon with 5.8 L/100km. The difference is about 1.1 L/100km.

Arkana

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Arkana offers clearly more power – delivering 143 HP compared to 90 HP. That’s roughly 53 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Arkana is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 10.8 s, while the Hyundai Bayon takes 11.9 s. That’s about 1.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Arkana delivers somewhat more torque with 205 Nm compared to 172 Nm. That’s about 33 Nm more.

Bayon

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Hyundai Bayon is noticeably lighter – 1,175 kg compared to 1,510 kg. The difference is around 335 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Hyundai Bayon carries only slightly more – 460 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 9 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Arkana is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £28,500
Arkana

Renault Arkana

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 143 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.7 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Bayon
Hyundai i20
VS
Choosing between the Hyundai Bayon and the Hyundai i20 comes down to whether you prefer a compact crossover with higher ride height and extra practicality (Bayon) or a sharper, more efficient hatchback with sportier handling (i20). I’ll compare their space, driving feel, fuel economy and equipment …
Hyundai Bayon
Kia Stonic
VS
Small crossover, big decisions: the Hyundai Bayon and Kia Stonic duke it out in the compact SUV ring, each promising city-smarts, style and sensible running costs. One brings bold tech and fresh looks, the other leans on practicality and value — so let’s see which small SUV deserves your keys (and …
Hyundai Bayon
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Hyundai Bayon

The Hyundai Bayon slips neatly between city runabout and small SUV, offering surprising practicality and a fresh, confident design that stands out in urban traffic. It's an easy buy for shoppers who want smart packaging, tidy handling and a dash of personality without fuss — a sensible little crossover that makes everyday driving a bit more enjoyable.

details
hyundai-all-new-bayon-static-01
hyundai-all-new-bayon-static-02
hyundai-all-new-bayon-static-08
hyundai-all-new-bayon-interior-01
hyundai-all-new-bayon-details-06

Reviews Hyundai Bayon

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Janusz
29 Apr 2026, 09:15:55

Definitely the Hyundai Bayon — the most important thing is the simply designed 1.2 MPI four-cylinder engine, 84 hp, adapted for LPG and cheap to repair, beautiful looks, a five-year warranty, cheaper to buy, and performance completely sufficient for a senior. A four-cylinder engine runs smoother and is better refined. I will buy this car in December 2026 at the Hyundai dealership in Toruń.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
André CGARLIER
20 Jan 2026, 19:35:46

I bought the HUNDAY BAYON one month ago.
600 km later, first small problem — the gauge stopped working.
I have an appointment set for 15 days from now. That said, it’s a real pleasure to drive: very smooth, lively acceleration, comfortable and perfect visibility. 800 km on the clock, but I’ve noticed city fuel consumption is much higher than advertised — 9.7 litres/100 km, mostly urban driving.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Renault Arkana

The Renault Arkana turns heads with its coupe-like roofline and SUV practicality, offering stylish presence without pretending to be a supercar. It feels composed and economical on everyday roads, making it a savvy choice for buyers who want flair and sensible running costs with a wink rather than a roar.

details
r210653p
r210654p
r210665p
r210657p
r210613p
r210616p

Reviews Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
Sonja
8 Apr 2026, 14:14:58

We've been driving the Arkana RS Line mild-hybrid for almost five years — and we're mega satisfied. At first everyone turned to stare. It's a good car to cover motorway miles, and fuel consumption of about 6.4 l/100 km is acceptable. Since our contract is ending, we're parting with the Arkana despite the lovely years together and switching to the Symbioz full-hybrid 160 Alpine Line. Hopefully we'll have a great time with it too.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Cesare
29 Jan 2026, 09:29:59

An excellent compromise between styling, practicality, space and fuel consumption. It’s not a sporty coupe, but practical for everyday use, with balanced purchase and running costs.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Hans Persson
19 Sept 2025, 16:05:49

An almost fully equipped car that's economical and stylish.

Frequently compared as well

Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
Here’s a straightforward comparison between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Symbioz to help you decide which fits your needs. The Arkana is a production compact crossover focused on practicality and hybrid efficiency, while the Symbioz is Renault’s forward-looking electric concept showcasing …
Renault Arkana
Renault Austral
VS
Choosing between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Austral comes down to whether you want a coupe‑styled compact SUV that prioritises flair and efficiency (Arkana) or a more conventional family SUV that emphasises space and refinement (Austral). This comparison will cut through the marketing to …
Hyundai Bayon
Hyundai Kona
VS
The Hyundai Bayon and Hyundai Kona are closely related compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want a small SUV, but they take different approaches to size, style and capability. This comparison will help you decide whether the Bayon’s city-focused practicality and value or the Kona’s wider engine …
Hyundai Bayon
Hyundai i30
VS
The Hyundai Bayon and Hyundai i30 serve different buyers: the Bayon is a compact crossover offering a taller driving position and SUV-style practicality, while the i30 is a conventional family hatchback focused on sharper handling and on-road refinement. This comparison will help you decide whether …
Renault Arkana
Renault Rafale
VS
The Renault Arkana and Renault Rafale represent two different takes on Renault's crossover line-up: the Arkana is a compact, value-focused coupe-SUV, while the Rafale aims higher as a larger, more premium fastback crossover packed with technology. This comparison strips away the marketing to help …
Ford Puma
Hyundai Bayon
VS
Ford Puma and Hyundai Bayon are compact crossover rivals that blend city-friendly dimensions with SUV styling and efficient engines. This quick comparison highlights how they differ in driving feel, cabin practicality, equipment and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your daily needs.
Hyundai Bayon
Hyundai Tucson
VS
Hyundai Bayon and Hyundai Tucson go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Hyundai Bayon
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Hyundai Bayon is a city-focused compact crossover, while the Suzuki Vitara is a slightly larger, more conventional compact SUV with the option of all‑wheel drive. This comparison will run through space, comfort, driving character, running costs and equipment to help you pick the better fit for …
Hyundai Bayon
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
Price
20,500 - 26,200 £
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
130 - 132 g/km
co2
106 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,175 - 1,200 kg
Curb weight
1,510 kg
Trunk capacity
411 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,775 mm
Width
1,821 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
450 - 460 kg
Payload
451 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
90 HP
Power HP
143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.9 - 13.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
172 Nm
Torque
205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
66 kW
Power kW
105 kW
Engine capacity
998 cm3
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Hyundai
Brand
Renault
What drive types are available for the Hyundai Bayon?

The Hyundai Bayon is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.