VS

Hyundai i30 Wagon vs Mazda CX-80 comparison

Compare performance (150 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (25,400 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Hyundai i30 Wagon or Mazda CX-80?

Hyundai i30 Wagon vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences

Hyundai i30 Wagon

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • significantly lighter
  • considerably more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

i30 Wagon

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Hyundai i30 Wagon is substantially cheaper – starting at 25,400 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 23,914 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Hyundai i30 Wagon with 5.9 L/100km. The difference is about 1.9 L/100km.

CX-80

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers considerably more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 177 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Hyundai i30 Wagon takes 9.1 s. That’s about 2.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers clearly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 300 Nm more.

i30 Wagon

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Hyundai i30 Wagon is significantly lighter – 1,340 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 791 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Hyundai i30 Wagon offers considerably more boot space – 602 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 344 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries visibly more – 650 kg compared to 490 kg. That’s a difference of about 160 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-80 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,300
CX-80

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 60 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai i30 Wagon
Kia Ceed Sportswagon
VS
Like siblings with different wardrobes, the Hyundai i30 Wagon and Kia Ceed Sportswagon share bones and boot space but diverge in character: the i30 Wagon feels a touch sharper to drive with slightly more upmarket interior touches, while the Ceed Sportswagon prioritises comfort, equipment and …
Hyundai i30 Wagon
Toyota Corolla Touring Sports
VS
The Hyundai i30 Wagon and the Toyota Corolla Touring Sports are two practical compact estates aimed at buyers who need space without moving up to a big SUV. This comparison looks at their practicality, fuel efficiency, driving dynamics and running costs to help you decide which is the smarter …
Hyundai i30 Wagon
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Hyundai i30 Wagon

The Hyundai i30 Wagon is a practical family hauler that pairs roomy, sensible packaging with clean, modern lines and a surprisingly composed chassis. Comfortable, well-equipped and priced to make rivals sweat, it quietly ticks the boxes for daily life and weekend escapes while still managing a little grin on twisty roads.

details
Hyundai_i30_Kombi_035
Hyundai_i30_Kombi_040
Hyundai_i30_Kombi_014
Hyundai_i30_Kombi_070
Hyundai_i30_Kombi_076

Reviews Hyundai i30 Wagon

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
Adrian
17 Jan 2026, 21:20:42

As a practical user of the i30 1.5 wagon and the Skoda Scala, I can generally say the Hyundai is the better car. Why?

- Better cabin insulation
- More space for the driver, with a wider range of steering-wheel adjustment
- Interior is better made and fitted
- More comfortable driving position
- Handles better
- Stronger brakes

Cons:
- Higher fuel consumption
- Overall less modern styling
- Slightly weaker headlights vs. the Skoda

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Hyundai i30
Hyundai i30 Wagon
VS
Choosing between the Hyundai i30 hatchback and the i30 Wagon comes down to whether you prioritize compact daily driving or extra cargo space for family and gear. The hatch is more city-friendly and nimble, while the wagon adds load-carrying practicality without sacrificing much in comfort or …
Hyundai i30 Wagon
Skoda Octavia Combi
VS
Unsure whether the Hyundai i30 Wagon or the Skoda Octavia Combi is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Kia Sorento
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Kia Sorento and Mazda CX-80 stand out with their unique blend of style, technology, and practicality. The Sorento impresses with its spacious interior and advanced driver-assistance features, making it a family-friendly choice, while the CX-80 captivates …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-80
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-5 or the Mazda CX-80 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-80
Peugeot 5008
VS
In the clash between the Mazda CX-80 and the Peugeot 5008, both SUVs deliver a commendable blend of style and functionality. The Mazda CX-80 impresses with its sleek aesthetics and a robust performance offering, suited for those who prioritize driving dynamics. Meanwhile, the Peugeot 5008 shines …
Hyundai i30 Wagon
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,400 - 32,300 £
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Consumption L/100km
5.9 - 6.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
134 - 142 g/km
co2
91 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Estate
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,340 - 1,460 kg
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Trunk capacity
602 L
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
450 - 490 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 11.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
172 - 250 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
Hyundai
Brand
Mazda
What drive types are available for the Hyundai i30 Wagon?

The Hyundai i30 Wagon is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.