VS

Hyundai Kona vs Ford Puma comparison

Compare performance (218 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (23,100 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Hyundai Kona or Ford Puma?

Hyundai Kona vs Ford Puma: Key differences

Hyundai Kona

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • visibly more power
  • a bit more efficient
  • slightly more electric range

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly more efficient
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Kona

The compact SUV market has exploded in popularity, and two noteworthy contenders in this space are the Ford Puma and the Hyundai Kona. Both offer modern aesthetics, advanced technology, and a variety of powertrain options, making it crucial for potential buyers to understand their differences. This article aims to provide an in-depth comparison covering technical aspects, innovation, and performance characteristics of these two popular models.

Puma

Engine and Performance

The Ford Puma offers a range of engine choices with an emphasis on efficiency. Its petrol line-up includes a mild-hybrid version, providing options such as 125 HP and more powerful variants up to 168 HP. The Puma is also available with an electric powertrain that allows for an electric range of up to 376 km, making it a strong option for environmentally conscious consumers. The 0-100 km/h acceleration times for the Puma range from 7.4 seconds for the quickest variant to 9.8 seconds.

In contrast, the Hyundai Kona features a diverse lineup that includes petrol engines, hybrids, and fully electric variants. The most powerful Kona can deliver up to 218 HP with an impressive 0-100 km/h time of just 7.8 seconds. The Kona electric boasts a remarkable range of up to 514 km, appealing to those who prioritize electric mobility. The combination of the Kona’s all-wheel-drive capability in certain variants also offers enhanced grip and driving security.

Kona

Fuel Economy

The Ford Puma scores commendably in fuel efficiency, with consumption figures ranging from 5.4 to 6 L/100 km depending on the variant. The electric version consumes about 13.1 kWh/100 km, making it competitive in its segment.

The Hyundai Kona, however, takes a slightly different approach with its efficiency. Its petrol variants consume between 4.5 and 6.7 L/100 km, while the electric variants see consumption figures as high as 16.8 kWh/100 km. Despite this, the Kona shines with its hybrid options, effectively balancing power and fuel economy.

Puma

Interior and Comfort

When it comes to interior space and comfort, both the Ford Puma and Hyundai Kona cater well to families. The Puma features a trunk capacity of 456 to 523 liters, providing ample storage for any adventure. Additionally, the interior design is sleek and equipped with modern technology, enhancing the driving experience.

The Hyundai Kona offers a trunk capacity of 466 liters, presenting a comparable space for cargo. However, the Kona excels with its layout and modern tech features, which include a user-friendly infotainment system and a suite of driver-assistance technologies. Both SUVs comfortably seat five passengers, making them practical choices for urban commuting or weekend getaways.

Kona

Safety and Innovations

Safety is a top priority for both manufacturers. The Ford Puma comes equipped with a broad array of features, including pre-collision assist and adaptive cruise control, which contribute to its solid safety credentials.

Similarly, the Hyundai Kona does not fall short in this area, boasting features such as autonomous emergency braking and lane-keeping assist. Both vehicles received respectable ratings from safety organizations, ensuring peace of mind for buyers.

Puma

Final Thoughts

Choosing between the Ford Puma and Hyundai Kona ultimately boils down to individual preferences and requirements. The Puma tends to emphasize a sportier drive with its mild-hybrid options, while the Kona presents a more versatile lineup catering to a variety of consumers, particularly those seeking electric and hybrid technologies.

In summary, both the Ford Puma and Hyundai Kona represent the best of what compact SUVs have to offer, combining style, performance, and technology in a way that appeals to a wide range of drivers. Whatever your choice, you can be assured that both models will deliver an engaging driving experience and a host of modern conveniences.

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Kona
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Hyundai Kona serves up sharper handling, eye-catching design and punchier tech for drivers who want a bit of fun with their commute, while the Toyota Yaris Cross favours sensible virtues — class-leading hybrid economy, solid build and a more practical cabin for real-world family life. If you …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kona

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Hyundai Kona is marginally cheaper – starting at 23,100 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 857 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Hyundai Kona uses 4.6 L/100km and is a bit more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.8 L/100km.

In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is slightly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 14.6 kWh/100km for the Hyundai Kona. That’s a difference of about 1.6 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Hyundai Kona offers slightly more range – reaching up to 514 km, about 97 km more than the Ford Puma.

Puma

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Hyundai Kona offers visibly more power – delivering 218 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 50 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Hyundai Kona takes 7.8 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers barely more torque with 290 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm more.

Kona

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is marginally lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,370 kg. The difference is around 54 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Hyundai Kona carries only slightly more – 490 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 21 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Hyundai Kona is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,100
Kona

Hyundai Kona

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 218 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.6 - 7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.6 - 16.8 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 377 - 514 km
details
Hyundai Kona
Ford Puma

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Hyundai Kona

The Hyundai Kona wears its personality on the outside with bold styling and sprightly handling that turns city driving into something a little more fun than a commute. It blends practical space, modern tech and sensible running costs into a compact, stylish package — a smart pick if you want flair without paying luxury prices.

details
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-07_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-10_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-02_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-21_jpg

Reviews Hyundai Kona

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Kona
Kia EV3
VS
The Hyundai Kona and the Kia EV6 stand out in the rapidly expanding electric SUV market, each offering unique strengths tailored to different driver preferences. The Kona impresses with its compact design and nimble handling, making it a great choice for urban environments, while the EV6 boasts a …
Hyundai Kona
Kia Sportage
VS
The Hyundai Kona and Kia Sportage go head-to-head in the compact-SUV ring — the Kona is cheeky, city-savvy and punchy, while the Sportage leans into grown-up comfort and family-friendly practicality. We’ll break down which one gives you sharper driving thrills, better everyday usability and the …
Hyundai Kona
Kia XCeed
VS
Choosing between the Hyundai Kona and the Kia XCeed is like picking between a sprightly city fox and a composed urban hatchback with SUV vibes — both promise personality, practicality and sensible running costs without breaking the bank. The Kona delivers cheeky styling and punchy handling for …
Hyundai Kona
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Welcome to DriveDuel’s compact-SUV throwdown: the cheeky, city-savvy Hyundai Kona goes head-to-head with the sensible, grown-up Nissan Qashqai to see which one should park in your life. Expect feisty styling and nimble urban manners from the Kona, measured space and comfort from the Qashqai — we’ll …
Ford Puma
VW T-Cross
VS
The Ford Puma and VW T‑Cross go head-to-head in the compact crossover class — one flirty and fun, the other sensible and steady — both promising SUV looks without the bulk. We’ll pit the Puma’s lively handling and clever storage tricks against the T‑Cross’s comfort-first setup and family-friendly …
Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Ford Puma stands out with its striking design and impressive driving dynamics, making it a popular choice for those seeking a sporty feel. Meanwhile, the SEAT Arona appeals to buyers with its spacious interior and efficient engine options, offering …
Hyundai Kona
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Hyundai Kona and SEAT Arona offer distinct appeal for urban drivers. The Kona stands out with its bold styling, advanced tech features, and a variety of powertrains, while the Arona impresses with its dynamic handling and customizable design options. …
Hyundai Kona
Ford Puma

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,100 - 41,600 £
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.8 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
Electric Range
377 - 514 km
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Battery Capacity
48.4 - 65.4 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 163 g/km
co2
0 - 135 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,370 - 1,773 kg
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
4,355 - 4,385 mm
Length
-
Width
1,825 mm
Width
1,805 mm
Height
1,580 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,300 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
420 - 490 kg
Payload
367 - 469 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 218 HP
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 11.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Max Speed
162 - 172 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
85 - 160 kW
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
999 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C, E, F
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
Brand
Hyundai
Brand
Ford
Is the Hyundai Kona offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.