Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Hyundai Kona vs MG Cyberster comparison
Compare performance (204 HP vs 510 HP), boot space and price (23,100 £ vs 55,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Hyundai Kona or MG Cyberster?
Hyundai Kona vs MG Cyberster: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Kona
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Hyundai Kona is substantially cheaper – starting at 23,100 £ , while the MG Cyberster costs 55,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 32,648 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Hyundai Kona is moderately more efficient: consuming 14.6 kWh/100km compared to 16.7 kWh/100km for the MG Cyberster. That’s a difference of about 2.1 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Hyundai Kona offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 510 km, about 3 km more than the MG Cyberster.
Cyberster
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the MG Cyberster offers substantially more power – delivering 510 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 306 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG Cyberster is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.2 s, while the Hyundai Kona takes 8.1 s. That’s about 4.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the MG Cyberster delivers significantly more torque with 725 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 460 Nm more.
Kona
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Hyundai Kona offers more seats – 5 vs 2.
In terms of curb weight, Hyundai Kona is significantly lighter – 1,370 kg compared to 1,960 kg. The difference is around 590 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Hyundai Kona offers clearly more boot space – 466 L compared to 200 L. That’s a difference of about 266 L.
When it comes to payload, the Hyundai Kona carries significantly more – 490 kg compared to 150 kg. That’s a difference of about 340 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Hyundai Kona is clearly ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,100
Hyundai Kona
Hyundai Kona
MG Cyberster
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Hyundai Kona
The Hyundai Kona wears its personality on the outside with bold styling and sprightly handling that turns city driving into something a little more fun than a commute. It blends practical space, modern tech and sensible running costs into a compact, stylish package — a smart pick if you want flair without paying luxury prices.
details
MG Cyberster
The Cyberster is a striking new addition to the electric vehicle landscape, captivating enthusiasts with its sleek design and sporty silhouette. This all-electric convertible combines innovative technology with an exhilarating driving experience, making it a standout choice for those who crave adventure. With its commitment to sustainability and performance, the Cyberster is poised to redefine the way we think about modern roadsters.
details
Hyundai Kona
MG Cyberster
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,100 - 41,900 £
|
Price
55,700 - 60,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 19.1 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
380 - 510 km
|
Electric Range
443 - 507 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 163 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Roadster
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
2
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,370 - 1,773 kg
|
Curb weight
1,960 - 2,060 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
466 L
|
Trunk capacity
200 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,825 mm
|
Width
1,913 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
420 - 490 kg
|
Payload
150 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 204 HP
|
Power HP
340 - 510 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.2 - 5.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
|
Torque
475 - 725 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
|
Power kW
250 - 375 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, F, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Hyundai
|
Brand
MG
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.