VS

Hyundai Kona vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan comparison

Compare performance (204 HP vs 600 HP), boot space and price (23,600 £ vs 275,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Hyundai Kona or Rolls-Royce Cullinan?

Hyundai Kona vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan: Key differences

Hyundai Kona

4.6 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • considerably lighter
details

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

  • clearly more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kona

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Hyundai Kona is significantly cheaper – starting at 23,600 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan costs 275,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 251,829 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Hyundai Kona uses 4.6 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Rolls-Royce Cullinan with 16 L/100km. The difference is about 11.4 L/100km.

Cullinan

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers clearly more power – delivering 600 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 396 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Hyundai Kona takes 8.1 s. That’s about 3.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Rolls-Royce Cullinan delivers substantially more torque with 900 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 635 Nm more.

Kona

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Hyundai Kona is considerably lighter – 1,370 kg compared to 2,660 kg. The difference is around 1,290 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers slightly more boot space – 555 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 89 L.

When it comes to payload, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan carries considerably more – 840 kg compared to 490 kg. That’s a difference of about 350 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Hyundai Kona is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,600
Kona

Hyundai Kona

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
  • Transmission Manual, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 115 - 204 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.6 - 7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 380 - 510 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Kona
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Hyundai Kona and Toyota Yaris Cross are two leading subcompact crossover SUVs that suit buyers wanting compact size, efficient powertrains and easy city driving. This comparison looks at how the Kona and Yaris Cross differ in driving feel, interior space, practicality and ownership costs so you …
Hyundai Kona
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Hyundai Kona and the Renault Symbioz represent two very different visions of mobility: the Kona is a compact, practical crossover you can buy today, while the Symbioz is Renault’s futuristic concept car showcasing autonomous, connected electric technologies. If you want an affordable, …
Hyundai Kona
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Hyundai Kona

The Hyundai Kona is a compact crossover that pairs bold styling with practical everyday usability, offering a comfortable cabin and intuitive tech for modern drivers. Available in both conventional and electrified versions, Kona brings lively handling and strong value for buyers who want crossover versatility and standout character.

details
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-07_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-10_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-02_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-21_jpg

Reviews Hyundai Kona

4.6 (11 Reviews)
rate
Overall feedback on the Kona tends to be positive, with owners appreciating its comfortable, easy-to-access ride, modern technology and practical interior space. Typical praise focuses on roomy packaging, a reassuring sense of safety and decent efficiency, while the most common complaint is about finish quality—particularly fragile paint and small chips. Comments are fairly short and come from varied driving profiles, so these patterns are useful but not deeply detailed.
Fox
9 Sept 2026, 18:24:32

Extremely economical, no noticeable fuel consumption while idling - top car for the price.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Wendy
18 Jun 2026, 20:05:08

More space in the Kona, and I find the Opel confusing with an oddly high step-in.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
OLGA
12 Jun 2026, 00:41:55

I feel very safe driving the Kona. I’ve been driving since I was 24 and I’m 76. I’ve had many brands — BMW X3, BMW X5, Ford, Peugeot, Renault — all very good brands, but the Kona seduced me and I don’t want to change; it’s just that the 2026 version isn’t coming into Argentina.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Paul Corkish
8 Jun 2026, 11:47:29

About to buy my new 3rd Kona (2nd N line Hybrid)

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Austin
21 May 2026, 19:30:33

Better fit for is 6'3" people

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

The Cullinan seamlessly combines the hallmark luxury of Rolls-Royce with the rugged versatility of an SUV, making it a true standout in the automotive landscape. Its impeccably crafted interior envelops passengers in a serene atmosphere, complemented by advanced technology and unparalleled comfort. With its commanding presence on the road, the Cullinan redefines what it means to travel in style without compromising on capability.

details
serpimg_Pd0UC9

Reviews Rolls-Royce Cullinan

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Bayon
Hyundai Kona
VS
The Hyundai Bayon and Hyundai Kona are closely related compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want a small SUV, but they take different approaches to size, style and capability. This comparison will help you decide whether the Bayon’s city-focused practicality and value or the Kona’s wider engine …
Hyundai Kona
Kia EV3
VS
Choosing between the Hyundai Kona and the Kia EV3 comes down to whether you prefer a well-established compact crossover with a proven track record or a newer electric contender focused on efficiency and modern tech. I’ll walk you through how they compare across range, practicality, driving feel and …
Hyundai Kona
Kia Stonic
VS
The Hyundai Kona and Kia Stonic are two popular compact crossovers that blend city-friendly size with SUV styling and efficient engines. This comparison focuses on the practical differences—space, driving feel, equipment and running costs—so you can pick the one that fits your priorities.
Hyundai Kona
Kia XCeed
VS
Choosing between the Hyundai Kona and the Kia XCeed is like picking between a sprightly city fox and a composed urban hatchback with SUV vibes — both promise personality, practicality and sensible running costs without breaking the bank. The Kona delivers cheeky styling and punchy handling for …
Hyundai Kona
Kia Sportage
VS
The Hyundai Kona and Kia Sportage go head-to-head in the compact-SUV ring — the Kona is cheeky, city-savvy and punchy, while the Sportage leans into grown-up comfort and family-friendly practicality. We’ll break down which one gives you sharper driving thrills, better everyday usability and the …
Hyundai Kona
Renault Captur
VS
The Hyundai Kona and Renault Captur are two of the most popular small crossovers, each offering distinctive styling, compact practicality and a variety of efficient powertrain options. This comparison will focus on how they differ in space, comfort, driving feel, technology and running costs to …
Hyundai Kona
MG ZS
VS
The Hyundai Kona and the MG ZS are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want SUV styling in a city-friendly package. The Kona leans toward sharper handling and a more refined drive, while the ZS competes on value and generous equipment—so your priorities for driving feel, features and budget will …
Hyundai Kona
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Hyundai Kona and Skoda Kamiq are two popular compact crossovers that take different routes to the same goal: city-friendly size with SUV styling. This comparison looks at driving feel, interior practicality, fuel efficiency and running costs to help you choose which suits your everyday needs.
Hyundai Kona
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,600 - 41,900 £
Price
275,400 - 324,600 £
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
16 - 16.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
380 - 510 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 163 g/km
co2
363 - 380 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,370 - 1,773 kg
Curb weight
2,660 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
555 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,825 mm
Width
2,000 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
420 - 490 kg
Payload
840 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 204 HP
Power HP
571 - 600 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Torque
850 - 900 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
12
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
Power kW
420 - 441 kW
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
6,749 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, F, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Hyundai
Brand
Rolls-Royce
Is the Hyundai Kona offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.