Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Hyundai Kona vs Skoda Octavia Combi - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (218 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (23100 £ vs 24400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Hyundai Kona or Skoda Octavia Combi?
Kona
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Hyundai Kona has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23100 £ , while the Skoda Octavia Combi costs 24400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1363 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Octavia Combi manages with 4.40 L and is therefore slight more efficient than the Hyundai Kona with 4.60 L. The difference is about 0.20 L per 100 km.
Octavia Combi
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Octavia Combi has a to a small extent edge – offering 265 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 47 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Octavia Combi is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 6.50 s, while the Hyundai Kona takes 7.80 s. That’s about 1.30 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Octavia Combi performs slightly better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Hyundai Kona tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Octavia Combi pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 370 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 105 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Kona
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Skoda Octavia Combi is barely noticeable lighter – 1366 kg compared to 1370 kg. The difference is around 4 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Octavia Combi offers distinct more room – 640 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 174 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Octavia Combi performs noticeable better – up to 1700 L, which is about 400 L more than the Hyundai Kona.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Octavia Combi minimal takes the win – 534 kg compared to 490 kg. That’s a difference of about 44 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Octavia Combi holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Hyundai Kona
Skoda Octavia Combi
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £24,400
Skoda Octavia Combi
Hyundai Kona
5 (1 Reviews)
The Hyundai Kona wears its personality on the outside with bold styling and sprightly handling that turns city driving into something a little more fun than a commute. It blends practical space, modern tech and sensible running costs into a compact, stylish package — a smart pick if you want flair without paying luxury prices.
details
Skoda Octavia Combi
The Skoda Octavia Combi is the sensible family wagon that somehow turns grocery runs and long trips into a pleasant, unshowy experience — spacious, practical and built like it prefers reliability over flash. With smart touches, clever storage and a cabin that feels grown-up rather than frugal, it’s an easy recommendation for buyers who want maximum utility without sacrificing comfort or style.
details
Hyundai Kona
Skoda Octavia Combi
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23100 - 41600 £
|
Price
24400 - 42300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.8 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
377 - 514 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 65.4 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 163 g/km
|
co2
113 - 157 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
38 - 47 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1370 - 1773 kg
|
Curb weight
1366 - 1553 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
466 L
|
Trunk capacity
640 L
|
|
Length
4350 - 4385 mm
|
Length
4698 - 4709 mm
|
|
Width
1825 mm
|
Width
1829 mm
|
|
Height
1580 - 1585 mm
|
Height
1455 - 1468 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1300 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1700 L
|
|
Payload
420 - 490 kg
|
Payload
471 - 534 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
116 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 11.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.5 - 10.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
162 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
203 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
|
Torque
220 - 370 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C, E, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, C
|
|
Brand
Hyundai
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Is the Hyundai Kona offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.