Compare performance (204 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (23,100 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Hyundai Kona or VW T-Cross?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the ever-evolving world of compact SUVs, two models consistently attract the spotlight — the Hyundai Kona and the VW T-Cross. Both vehicles offer a blend of style, performance, and practicality; yet, they cater to different priorities among drivers. Here’s an in-depth comparison of these two dynamic contenders for 2024.
The Hyundai Kona provides a diverse range of powertrains including petrol, full hybrid, and electric, catering to a broad spectrum of consumer preferences. Petrol engines range between 100 HP to 170 HP, while the electric model peaks at 218 HP. It further offers a choice between manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions. Meanwhile, the electric Kona shines with an impressive electric range of up to 514 km, supported by a 65.4 kWh battery.
On the flip side, the VW T-Cross is crafted with simplicity but doesn't shy away from impressive performance. Under the hood, it features petrol engines delivering up to 150 HP. With a choice between a manual gearbox or a dual-clutch automatic transmission, it maintains a balance between performance and fuel efficiency, achieving a consumption rate as low as 5.6 L/100km.
When it comes to driving dynamics, the Kona offers both front-wheel and all-wheel drive options, bringing versatility and capability to varied road conditions. The VW T-Cross, however, opts strictly for front-wheel drive, positioning it as a straightforward urban SUV.
Both the Hyundai Kona and VW T-Cross comfortably accommodate up to five passengers. Kona offers a slightly more spacious trunk capacity of 466 liters compared to T-Cross’s 455 liters, presenting a marginal edge in cargo space. While Kona stretches to a length of around 4385 mm, the T-Cross is slightly more compact at 4127 mm long, which might appeal to city drivers seeking easier maneuverability.
The Hyundai Kona stands out with its mixed offerings of technology and innovation in both its hybrid and electric variants. Its ecological CO2 class hits an "A" rating in electric mode, comparable to its competitors. For fans of cutting-edge technology, the Kona’s electric model will surely be attractive, combining extended range with environmental responsibility.
The VW T-Cross, while primarily traditional with its petrol engines, is renowned for its solid build and reliability. Attention to detail in design and in-car connectivity features offers modern conveniences without overcomplication, making it suitable for everyday use.
Ultimately, selecting between the Hyundai Kona and the VW T-Cross lies in the prospective buyer’s priorities. The Hyundai Kona aims for versatility with its multi-powertrain options, making it a great choice for drivers with varied needs, including eco-friendly driving options. The VW T-Cross, however, offers a no-nonsense approach, with straightforward, reliable performance and a design tailored for urban settings. Both vehicles remain steadfast choices in the competitive compact SUV arena, catering to diverse lifestyles and driving preferences.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
VW T-Cross is barely cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Hyundai Kona costs 23,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,663 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Hyundai Kona uses 4.6 L/100km and is somewhat more efficient than the VW T-Cross with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.8 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Hyundai Kona offers visibly more power – delivering 204 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 54 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Hyundai Kona is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.1 s, while the VW T-Cross takes 8.4 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Hyundai Kona delivers marginally more torque with 265 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 15 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, VW T-Cross is barely lighter – 1,267 kg compared to 1,370 kg. The difference is around 103 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Hyundai Kona offers marginally more boot space – 466 L compared to 455 L. That’s a difference of about 11 L.
When it comes to payload, the Hyundai Kona carries only slightly more – 490 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 10 kg.
The Hyundai Kona holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Hyundai Kona is a compact crossover that pairs bold styling with practical everyday usability, offering a comfortable cabin and intuitive tech for modern drivers. Available in both conventional and electrified versions, Kona brings lively handling and strong value for buyers who want crossover versatility and standout character.
details
The VW T-Cross is a small, city-friendly crossover that blends practical packaging with easygoing driving manners and a high seating position for good visibility. It’s a sensible, comfortable choice for buyers who want the convenience and style of an SUV without big compromises.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,100 - 41,900 £
|
Price
21,400 - 32,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
380 - 510 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 163 g/km
|
co2
124 - 136 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,370 - 1,773 kg
|
Curb weight
1,267 - 1,338 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
466 L
|
Trunk capacity
455 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,825 mm
|
Width
1,784 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
420 - 490 kg
|
Payload
463 - 480 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 204 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, F, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
|
Brand
Hyundai
|
Brand
VW
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España