What drive types are available for the Hyundai Staria?

The Hyundai Staria is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Hyundai Staria?

Up to 225 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

How much fuel does the Hyundai Staria use?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 7.60 L.

How many liters of cargo space does the Hyundai Staria offer?

Depending on configuration, up to 831 L fit inside.

What are the Hyundai Staria’s length, width and height?

The Hyundai Staria measures 5253 mm long, 1997 mm wide and 1990 mm high.

What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-80?

The Mazda CX-80 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Mazda CX-80?

The Mazda CX-80 reaches a peak output of 327 HP, depending on the model.

What is the fuel consumption of the Mazda CX-80 according to the manufacturer?

On average, the Mazda CX-80 consumes 1.60 L.

What is the Mazda CX-80’s maximum WLTP range?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 61 km.

How fast can the Mazda CX-80 go?

The Mazda CX-80 reaches up to 219 km/h.

How much luggage fits in the Mazda CX-80?

Depending on configuration, up to 258 L fit inside.

How big is the Mazda CX-80 overall?

Overall, the Mazda CX-80 is 4995 mm long, 1890 mm wide and 1714 mm high.

Hyundai Staria vs Mazda CX-80 - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Staria @ Hyundai Motor Company

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Hyundai Staria has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 42400 £, while the Mazda CX-80 costs 48200 £. That’s a price difference of around 5786 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-80 manages with 1.60 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Hyundai Staria with 7.60 L. The difference is about 6 L per 100 km.

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 has a noticeable edge – offering 327 HP compared to 225 HP. That’s roughly 102 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.80 s, while the Hyundai Staria takes 10.20 s. That’s about 3.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-80 performs evident better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Hyundai Staria tops out at 167 km/h. The difference is around 52 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-80 pulls evident stronger with 550 Nm compared to 367 Nm. That’s about 183 Nm difference.

Staria @ Hyundai Motor Company

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Hyundai Staria offers distinct more seating capacity – 9 vs 7.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is hardly perceptible lighter – 2131 kg compared to 2275 kg. The difference is around 144 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Hyundai Staria offers clearly more room – 831 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 573 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-80 performs evident better – up to 1971 L, which is about 668 L more than the Hyundai Staria.

When it comes to payload, Hyundai Staria a bit takes the win – 775 kg compared to 650 kg. That’s a difference of about 125 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-80 proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-80 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Reviews Hyundai Staria

Reviews Mazda CX-80

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

In the showdown between the Mazda CX-80 and the Volvo XC90, both vehicles offer a compelling blend of luxury and practicality. While the CX-80 impresses with its sporty handling and sleek design, the XC90 shines with its superior safety features and spacious interior. Ultimately, the choice may …

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-80

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kodiaq

VS

In the competitive SUV market, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a premium feel that often rivals higher-priced models. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical versatility, making it an excellent …

Costs and Consumption
Price 42400 - 50500 £	Price 48200 - 60200 £
Consumption L/100km 7.60 L	Consumption L/100km 1.6 - 5.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range 61 km
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 172 g/km	co2 35 - 151 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 65 L	Fuel tank capacity 70 - 74 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type Bus	Body Type SUV
Seats 7 - 9	Seats 7
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 2275 - 2345 kg	Curb weight 2131 - 2240 kg
Trunk capacity 117 - 831 L	Trunk capacity 258 L
Length 5253 mm	Length 4995 mm
Width 1997 mm	Width 1890 mm
Height 1990 mm	Height 1714 mm
Max trunk capacity 431 - 1303 L	Max trunk capacity 1971 L
Payload 605 - 775 kg	Payload 649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Full Hybrid	Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 225 HP	Power HP 254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 10.20 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed 167 km/h	Max Speed 195 - 219 km/h
Torque 367 Nm	Torque 500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders 4 - 6
Power kW 165 kW	Power kW 187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity 1598 cm3	Engine capacity 2488 - 3283 cm3