Compare performance (269 HP vs 205 HP), boot space and price (32,400 £ vs 29,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jaguar E-Pace or Nissan Qashqai?
When it comes to choosing a compact SUV, the Jaguar E-Pace and Nissan Qashqai stand out as two popular choices. Both vehicles offer a compelling blend of performance, comfort, and modern technology, but differ in their approach and design philosophy. This comparison delves into the technical specifications and innovative features that define these models.
The Jaguar E-Pace brings to the table a versatile selection of engines, including a plug-in hybrid and mild hybrids in both petrol and diesel. With power outputs ranging from 160 HP to 269 HP, the E-Pace boasts strong performance credentials. The standout is its plug-in hybrid variant that provides an electric range of 69 km on a full charge, ideal for those looking to reduce their carbon footprint. The fuel efficiency is also commendable, with the hybrid sipping just 1.4 L/100km, reaching a maximum speed of 211 km/h, and accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 7.3 seconds.
In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai focuses primarily on petrol and hybrid engines. The Qashqai offers power outputs from 140 HP to 190 HP. The vehicle is equipped with either manual or CVT transmission options, providing flexibility to users with varying preferences. With a maximum speed reaching up to 206 km/h and an acceleration time of 7.9 seconds from 0 to 100 km/h, the Qashqai exhibits respectable performance for urban and highway driving. The full hybrid model presents an efficient consumption rate of 5.1 L/100km, offering a balance of performance and economy.
Aesthetically, the Jaguar E-Pace embodies the classic Jaguar dynamism married with SUV practicality. It measures 4395 mm in length, with a substantial width of 1984 mm, emphasizing its robust stance. This SUV stands 1648 mm tall and features a spacious trunk capacity of 494 L—ideal for family trips and extended journeys.
The Nissan Qashqai aims for a more versatile appeal with its modern, sharp design cues. Slightly longer at 4425 mm, the Qashqai has a narrower profile at 1835 mm in width. It stands at 1625 mm in height and offers a slightly larger trunk capacity of 504 L, catering well to lifestyle needs and offering flexibility for everyday practicality.
Both models come well-equipped with a suite of cutting-edge technologies. The Jaguar E-Pace is packed with advanced systems including configurable ambient lighting, a state-of-the-art infotainment system with wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, and a digital instrument cluster to keep the driver informed and connected.
On the other hand, the Nissan Qashqai integrates innovative features such as ProPILOT Assist with Navi-link, which enhances its semi-autonomous capabilities by using navigation data to provide smoother driving assistance on highways. The vehicle also offers a comprehensive infotainment system and an ergonomically crafted interior that accentuates comfort and convenience.
Both the Jaguar E-Pace and Nissan Qashqai offer compelling options in the compact SUV market space. The choice between the two largely boils down to personal preferences. The E-Pace appeals to those prioritizing luxury and performance, with a focus on hybrid technology. Meanwhile, the Qashqai is ideal for those seeking practicality, efficiency, and innovative driving assistance technologies.
Ultimately, both the Jaguar E-Pace and Nissan Qashqai prove that the compact SUV segment remains ripe with innovations and exciting options for discerning drivers.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Nissan Qashqai is very slightly cheaper – starting at 29,600 £ , while the Jaguar E-Pace costs 32,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,795 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jaguar E-Pace uses 1.4 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Nissan Qashqai with 4.5 L/100km. The difference is about 3.1 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Jaguar E-Pace offers markedly more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 205 HP. That’s roughly 64 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jaguar E-Pace is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.3 s, while the Nissan Qashqai takes 7.6 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Jaguar E-Pace is only slightly faster – reaching 211 km/h, while the Nissan Qashqai tops out at 206 km/h. The difference is around 5 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Jaguar E-Pace delivers markedly more torque with 540 Nm compared to 330 Nm. That’s about 210 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Nissan Qashqai is markedly lighter – 1,420 kg compared to 1,783 kg. The difference is around 363 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Nissan Qashqai offers barely more boot space – 504 L compared to 494 L. That’s a difference of about 10 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Nissan Qashqai offers a bit more capacity – up to 1,447 L, about 277 L more than the Jaguar E-Pace.
When it comes to payload, the Jaguar E-Pace carries barely more – 554 kg compared to 520 kg. That’s a difference of about 34 kg.
The Jaguar E-Pace holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Jaguar E-Pace brings compact SUV practicality together with taut, sporty design and unmistakable British charm, helping it stand out in a crowded class. Inside, the cabin feels premium and the driving manners are engaging enough to keep a grin on your face, making it a tempting choice for buyers who want Jaguar style without the bulk.
details
The Nissan Qashqai blends practical, family-friendly packaging with SUV styling that refuses to shout, making it a sensible and dependable choice for everyday life. It’s comfortable to live with, economical on the road, and neatly equipped enough to feel modern without ever feeling precious — perfect if you want crossover versatility without the drama.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
32,400 - 56,100 £
|
Price
29,600 - 39,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 8.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
69 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
11.5 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
33 - 185 g/km
|
co2
102 - 154 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 67 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,783 - 2,173 kg
|
Curb weight
1,420 - 1,665 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
494 L
|
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
|
|
Length
4,395 mm
|
Length
4,425 mm
|
|
Width
1,984 mm
|
Width
1,835 mm
|
|
Height
1,648 mm
|
Height
1,625 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,170 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,422 - 1,447 L
|
|
Payload
497 - 554 kg
|
Payload
466 - 520 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 205 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 10.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 10.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
190 - 211 km/h
|
Max Speed
170 - 206 km/h
|
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
Torque
240 - 330 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 151 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,998 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
|
Brand
Jaguar
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España