VS

Jaguar E-Pace vs Volvo XC60 comparison

Compare performance (269 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (32,400 £ vs 49,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jaguar E-Pace or Volvo XC60?

Jaguar E-Pace vs Volvo XC60: Key differences

Jaguar E-Pace

  • significantly cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • very slightly lighter
  • marginally more trunk space

Volvo XC60

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • moderately more electric range
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

E-Pace

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Jaguar E-Pace is significantly cheaper – starting at 32,400 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 49,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,791 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jaguar E-Pace uses 1.4 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Volvo XC60 with 2.8 L/100km. The difference is about 1.4 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo XC60 offers moderately more range – reaching up to 82 km, about 13 km more than the Jaguar E-Pace.

XC60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers considerably more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 186 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Jaguar E-Pace takes 7.3 s. That’s about 2.4 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Jaguar E-Pace is moderately faster – reaching 211 km/h, while the Volvo XC60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 31 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC60 delivers noticeably more torque with 709 Nm compared to 540 Nm. That’s about 169 Nm more.

E-Pace

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Jaguar E-Pace is very slightly lighter – 1,783 kg compared to 1,900 kg. The difference is around 117 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Jaguar E-Pace offers marginally more boot space – 494 L compared to 483 L. That’s a difference of about 11 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC60 offers noticeably more capacity – up to 1,543 L, about 373 L more than the Jaguar E-Pace.

When it comes to payload, the Jaguar E-Pace carries marginally more – 554 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 4 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Jaguar E-Pace is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £32,400
E-Pace

Jaguar E-Pace

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 160 - 269 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.4 - 8.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 69 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Toyota RAV4
Volvo XC60
VS
The Toyota RAV4 is the no-nonsense, go-anywhere compact SUV that scores on reliability, fuel economy and roomy practicality — ideal if you want low fuss, sensible running costs and maximum value. The Volvo XC60 swaps thrift for Scandinavian refinement, with a classier cabin, advanced safety tech …
Volvo XC60
Volvo EX60
VS
Meet the Volvo XC60 and the new Volvo EX60 — two mid‑size premium SUVs that look like cousins but drive like rivals, one rooted in combustion tradition and the other staking Volvo’s claim in the electric future. Which should you buy: the familiar, comfort-first XC60 that does everything reliably …
Jaguar E-Pace
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Jaguar E-Pace

The Jaguar E-Pace brings compact SUV practicality together with taut, sporty design and unmistakable British charm, helping it stand out in a crowded class. Inside, the cabin feels premium and the driving manners are engaging enough to keep a grin on your face, making it a tempting choice for buyers who want Jaguar style without the bulk.

details
Jag_E-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Yulong_White_100321_8342
Jag_E-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Yulong_White_100321_0067
Jag_E-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Yulong_White_100321_7835
Jag_E-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Yulong_White_Interior_100321_6884
Jag_E-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Yulong_White_Loadspace_100321_1072

Reviews Jaguar E-Pace

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Volvo XC60

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.

details
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
294983_XC60_Recharge_interior
288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior

Reviews Volvo XC60

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Volvo XC60
VW Tiguan
VS
Volvo XC60 feels like a Scandinavian living room on wheels — plush, impeccably safe and polished — while the VW Tiguan is the sensible all-rounder: practical, cheaper to run and surprisingly sprightly in town. Choose the XC60 if you want refinement and tech-laden comfort; pick the Tiguan if you …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
Volvo V60
Volvo XC60
VS
The V60 is the sleek, driver-focused estate that rewards cornering with a lower centre of gravity and tidy practicality, ideal if you want sporty poise without shouting SUV. The XC60 lifts you up for easier access, more upright space and a confident road presence — perfect for families or anyone …
Volvo XC60
Lynk & Co 08
VS
In the ring, the Volvo XC60 plays the composed, safety-first professional — impeccably finished, quietly luxurious and smugly reliable — while the Lynk & Co 08 storms in with bold styling, slabs of tech and a value-for-money punch. If you want comforting refinement and resale security, pick the …
Honda CR-V
Volvo XC60
VS
In the battle of the crossovers, the Honda CR-V and the Volvo XC60 stand out with distinct personalities. The CR-V, known for its reliability and value, excels in practicality with a spacious interior and impressive fuel efficiency. On the other hand, the XC60's luxurious design and advanced safety …
BMW iX3
Volvo XC60
VS
The BMW iX3 and Volvo XC60 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Peugeot 5008
Volvo XC60
VS
Unsure whether the Peugeot 5008 or the Volvo XC60 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-60
Volvo XC60
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the Mazda CX-60 and the Volvo XC60, both vehicles offer distinct advantages that cater to different driving preferences. The CX-60 impresses with its dynamic handling and engaging driving experience, while the XC60 shines in terms of luxury and advanced safety …
Jaguar E-Pace
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption
Price
32,400 - 56,100 £
Price
49,200 - 75,100 £
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
69 km
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
Battery Capacity
11.5 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
33 - 185 g/km
co2
64 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 67 L
Fuel tank capacity
71 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,783 - 2,173 kg
Curb weight
1,900 - 2,150 kg
Trunk capacity
494 L
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
Length
4,395 mm
Length
4,708 mm
Width
1,984 mm
Width
1,902 mm
Height
1,648 mm
Height
1,655 mm
Max trunk capacity
1,170 L
Max trunk capacity
1,543 L
Payload
497 - 554 kg
Payload
510 - 550 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 10.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
Max Speed
190 - 211 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,998 cm3
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
Brand
Jaguar
Brand
Volvo
What drive types are available for the Jaguar E-Pace?

The Jaguar E-Pace is available as All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.