Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Jaguar F-Pace vs Renault Arkana - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (575 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (56400 £ vs 28500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jaguar F-Pace or Renault Arkana?
F-Pace
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Renault Arkana has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 28500 £ , while the Jaguar F-Pace costs 56400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 27943 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Jaguar F-Pace manages with 1.80 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Renault Arkana with 4.70 L. The difference is about 2.90 L per 100 km.
Arkana
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Jaguar F-Pace has a decisively edge – offering 575 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 432 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jaguar F-Pace is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.80 s. That’s about 6.80 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Jaguar F-Pace performs distinct better – reaching 286 km/h, while the Renault Arkana tops out at 172 km/h. The difference is around 114 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Jaguar F-Pace pulls clearly stronger with 700 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 495 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
F-Pace
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Renault Arkana is evident lighter – 1510 kg compared to 1951 kg. The difference is around 441 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Renault Arkana offers minimal more room – 480 L compared to 470 L. That’s a difference of about 10 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Jaguar F-Pace performs somewhat better – up to 1428 L, which is about 165 L more than the Renault Arkana.
When it comes to payload, Jaguar F-Pace clearly perceptible takes the win – 589 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 138 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Jaguar F-Pace is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Jaguar F-Pace
Renault Arkana
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £56,400
Jaguar F-Pace
Jaguar F-Pace
5 (1 Reviews)
Jaguar F-Pace blends the prowling presence of a sports car with the practicality of an SUV, looking elegant while rewarding drivers with lively handling. If you crave something that feels special every time you climb in and prefer style and driving flair over blending into the parking lot, the F-Pace is a classy, slightly cheeky alternative to the usual German suspects.
details
Renault Arkana
4 (1 Reviews)
The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.
details
Jaguar F-Pace
Renault Arkana
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
56400 - 100800 £
|
Price
28500 - 31900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.8 - 12 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.70 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
64 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
15.40 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
|
|
co2
41 - 274 g/km
|
co2
106 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
62 - 83 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1951 - 2230 kg
|
Curb weight
1510 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
354 - 470 L
|
Trunk capacity
480 L
|
|
Length
4747 - 4762 mm
|
Length
4568 mm
|
|
Width
1936 mm
|
Width
1821 mm
|
|
Height
1664 - 1670 mm
|
Height
1576 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1299 - 1428 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1263 L
|
|
Payload
457 - 589 kg
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
163 - 575 HP
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 - 10.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.80 s
|
|
Max Speed
195 - 286 km/h
|
Max Speed
172 km/h
|
|
Torque
380 - 700 Nm
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 8
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
120 - 423 kW
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1997 - 5000 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Jaguar
|
Brand
Renault
|
What drive types are available for the Jaguar F-Pace?
Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.