Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Jaguar F-Pace vs Skoda Octavia Combi comparison
Compare performance (575 HP vs 204 HP), boot space and price (56,400 £ vs 25,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jaguar F-Pace or Skoda Octavia Combi?
Jaguar F-Pace vs Skoda Octavia Combi: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
F-Pace
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Skoda Octavia Combi is substantially cheaper – starting at 25,600 £ , while the Jaguar F-Pace costs 56,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 30,823 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jaguar F-Pace uses 1.8 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Skoda Octavia Combi with 4.4 L/100km. The difference is about 2.6 L/100km.
Octavia Combi
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Jaguar F-Pace offers substantially more power – delivering 575 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 371 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jaguar F-Pace is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Skoda Octavia Combi takes 6.7 s. That’s about 2.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Jaguar F-Pace delivers significantly more torque with 700 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 340 Nm more.
F-Pace
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Octavia Combi is significantly lighter – 1,366 kg compared to 1,951 kg. The difference is around 585 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Octavia Combi offers visibly more boot space – 640 L compared to 470 L. That’s a difference of about 170 L.
When it comes to payload, the Jaguar F-Pace carries marginally more – 589 kg compared to 534 kg. That’s a difference of about 55 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Jaguar F-Pace holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £56,400
Jaguar F-Pace
Jaguar F-Pace
Skoda Octavia Combi
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Jaguar F-Pace
Jaguar F-Pace blends the prowling presence of a sports car with the practicality of an SUV, looking elegant while rewarding drivers with lively handling. If you crave something that feels special every time you climb in and prefer style and driving flair over blending into the parking lot, the F-Pace is a classy, slightly cheeky alternative to the usual German suspects.
details
Skoda Octavia Combi
The Skoda Octavia Combi is a practical, well‑packaged estate that delivers generous and flexible interior space ideal for families or active owners. Its sensible cabin layout, comfortable ride and solid reputation for reliability make it a pragmatic choice for buyers who value utility over flash.
details
Jaguar F-Pace
Skoda Octavia Combi
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
56,400 - 100,800 £
|
Price
25,600 - 39,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.8 - 12 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
64 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
15.4 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
41 - 274 g/km
|
co2
113 - 157 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
62 - 83 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,951 - 2,230 kg
|
Curb weight
1,366 - 1,553 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
354 - 470 L
|
Trunk capacity
640 L
|
|
Length
4,747 - 4,762 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,936 mm
|
Width
1,829 mm
|
|
Height
1,664 - 1,670 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,299 - 1,428 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
457 - 589 kg
|
Payload
502 - 534 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
163 - 575 HP
|
Power HP
116 - 204 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 - 10.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.7 - 10.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
195 - 286 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
380 - 700 Nm
|
Torque
220 - 360 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 8
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
120 - 423 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,997 - 5,000 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, C
|
|
Brand
Jaguar
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.