Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Jaguar I-Pace vs Mazda MX-30 comparison
Compare performance (400 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (79,200 £ vs 30,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jaguar I-Pace or Mazda MX-30?
Jaguar I-Pace vs Mazda MX-30: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
I-Pace
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda MX-30 is considerably cheaper – starting at 30,800 £ , while the Jaguar I-Pace costs 79,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 48,352 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Mazda MX-30 is markedly more efficient: consuming 18.3 kWh/100km compared to 25.2 kWh/100km for the Jaguar I-Pace. That’s a difference of about 6.9 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Jaguar I-Pace offers considerably more range – reaching up to 469 km, about 384 km more than the Mazda MX-30.
MX-30
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Jaguar I-Pace offers clearly more power – delivering 400 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 230 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jaguar I-Pace is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.8 s, while the Mazda MX-30 takes 9.1 s. That’s about 4.3 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Jaguar I-Pace is noticeably faster – reaching 200 km/h, while the Mazda MX-30 tops out at 140 km/h. The difference is around 60 km/h.
I-Pace
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda MX-30 is visibly lighter – 1,849 kg compared to 2,226 kg. The difference is around 377 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Jaguar I-Pace offers considerably more boot space – 638 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 288 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Jaguar I-Pace offers markedly more capacity – up to 1,453 L, about 298 L more than the Mazda MX-30.
When it comes to payload, the Jaguar I-Pace carries only slightly more – 444 kg compared to 402 kg. That’s a difference of about 42 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Jaguar I-Pace stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £79,200
Jaguar I-Pace
Jaguar I-Pace
Mazda MX-30
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Jaguar I-Pace
The Jaguar I-Pace pairs instantaneous electric shove with graceful, feline looks, so it never feels like you're piloting a refrigerator with style. Inside it serves proper Jaguar luxury and clever packaging, making it a tempting choice for buyers who want EV convenience without losing personality.
details
Mazda MX-30
The Mazda MX-30 trades conventional EV practicality for a boutique vibe, wrapping easy urban agility and a stylish, artisan interior into a compact package that stands out in the crossover crowd. It’s ideal for city-minded buyers who value design and driving feel over long-distance trips, and its quirky details prove Mazda can be playful without losing its driver-focused soul.
details
Jaguar I-Pace
Mazda MX-30
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
79,200 - 85,500 £
|
Price
30,800 - 37,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
25.2 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
469 km
|
Electric Range
85 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
84.7 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
22 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,226 kg
|
Curb weight
1,849 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
638 L
|
Trunk capacity
332 - 350 L
|
|
Length
4,682 mm
|
Length
4,395 mm
|
|
Width
2,011 mm
|
Width
1,848 mm
|
|
Height
1,566 mm
|
Height
1,555 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,453 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,137 - 1,155 L
|
|
Payload
444 kg
|
Payload
402 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
400 HP
|
Power HP
170 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
200 km/h
|
Max Speed
140 km/h
|
|
Torque
696 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
294 kW
|
Power kW
125 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
830 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Jaguar
|
Brand
Mazda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.